Monday, May 31, 2004
Light posting next 2 weeks
while I take care of personal stuff and upgrade.
Currently I am using AOL dial-up and Windows ME on a four-year-old laptop that didn't work well even when it was new, and now barely functions. Needless to say, using the internet is simply painful.
Fortunately a favorable change in circumstances will allow me to upgrade to a brand-new Mac, and get broadband from a more reliable IP while I'm at it. I expect the whole process to be complete by about June 15, after which I'll be able to get a lot more done, faster, with less headache and heartbreak. Until then I will be posting occasionally; Morning Report will be on light duty.
|
Currently I am using AOL dial-up and Windows ME on a four-year-old laptop that didn't work well even when it was new, and now barely functions. Needless to say, using the internet is simply painful.
Fortunately a favorable change in circumstances will allow me to upgrade to a brand-new Mac, and get broadband from a more reliable IP while I'm at it. I expect the whole process to be complete by about June 15, after which I'll be able to get a lot more done, faster, with less headache and heartbreak. Until then I will be posting occasionally; Morning Report will be on light duty.
Sunday, May 30, 2004
IRI Offensive: That Link
Complete article at MEMRI can be read here.
|
Iran Regime Readies Bombing Wave Against Iraq, West
From MEMRI, courtesy of FreeIran:
Iran's Revolutionary Guards Official Threatens Suicide Operations: 'Our Missiles Are Ready to Strike at Anglo-Saxon Culture… There Are 29 Sensitive Sites in the U.S. and the West…'
More info, link to follow.
|
Iran's Revolutionary Guards Official Threatens Suicide Operations: 'Our Missiles Are Ready to Strike at Anglo-Saxon Culture… There Are 29 Sensitive Sites in the U.S. and the West…'
More info, link to follow.
Building the Future: Women for Women
Women for Women, founded by a refugee, works to empower women in developing countries.
"Women for Women International was founded in 1993 to help women overcome the horrors of war and civil strife in ways that can help them rebuild their lives, families, and communities. Women for Women International’s tiered program begins with direct financial and emotional support; fosters awareness and understanding of women’s rights; offers vocational skills training; and provides access to income-generation support and microcredit loans that together can help women restart their lives in ways that are independent, productive, and secure.
Women for Women International has direct experience in Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Rwanda, Kosovo, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Colombia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iraq. We have assisted more than 21,500 women, distributing $9 million in direct aid and microcredit loans."
Now go check out their site.
|
"Women for Women International was founded in 1993 to help women overcome the horrors of war and civil strife in ways that can help them rebuild their lives, families, and communities. Women for Women International’s tiered program begins with direct financial and emotional support; fosters awareness and understanding of women’s rights; offers vocational skills training; and provides access to income-generation support and microcredit loans that together can help women restart their lives in ways that are independent, productive, and secure.
Women for Women International has direct experience in Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Rwanda, Kosovo, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Colombia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iraq. We have assisted more than 21,500 women, distributing $9 million in direct aid and microcredit loans."
Now go check out their site.
Building the Future: Mercy Corps
Portland's own Mercy Corps helps people in places as far away as Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea, and Guatemala. Check out their site, and make a donation if you can.
|
Calling Planet Earth: Sudan Needs You
How many people have to die before the world takes Sudan seriously?
Jane writes:
Where is the noise, the rumbling, the Al Gore outburst regarding the Sudan? Where's the vocal, blustering intellectual-academic-media contingent? Where are the Arab Street and Rush Limbaugh? As the world averted its eyes from the hacking machetes in Rwanda, we turn our back again on Africa. A half a million Sudanese people may die at the hands of their own government within short months and there's little screaming; we barely hear a word. Sudanese sovereignty will not be breached.
In the last year the Sudanese government has been killing its own people systematically. ...
Today's CNN story says:
For several months my colleague, Dr. Camilo Valderrama, has been raising alarm about the need for regular food distributions in this area, where nearly a fourth of the refugees that fled to Chad are seeking shelter.
...
It's May 12 and Camilo is attending to Hadiya Beshir Issa, 25, and her 15-month-old daughter Munira at an IRC health facility in Bahai. They are recent arrivals in a seemingly endless stream of refugees fleeing brutal attacks in Darfur, Sudan.
Munira hardly has the strength to open her eyes and her skin is shriveled from dehydration. Camilo says the tiny girl is severely malnourished and he instructs Hadiya how to administer oral re-hydration solution and antibiotics.
Hadiya is from a village near Kutum in northern Darfur, where the IRC is also providing humanitarian aid. She told me that a militia attacked her village last August and that her family fled to the town of Orshi, on the way to Chad.
But that town was ransacked by gunmen last month and in the chaos, Hadiya became separated from her husband and the rest of her family. She told me that she has no idea if they are still alive. After an eight-day trek, she crossed into Chad with her baby, arriving in Bahai with 17 other families.
As Hadiya recounted her story, Camilo continued to treat Munira. But in the next couple of hours, the little girl's condition rapidly deteriorated. We quickly took her to the hospital in Tine, two hours away, but doctors there couldn't even find the child's veins in order to administer intravenous liquid. She was beyond help. ...
In the BBC:
UN Emergency Relief Co-ordinator Jan Egeland said many donors failed to realise that the crisis was the biggest humanitarian drama of our time.
He said the UN still only had a 20% of the resources needed to help 2m people.
Mr Egeland criticised the Sudanese government for making it difficult for them to bring in trucks and medicines. ...
A report last month by the UN human rights commissioner described systematic attacks on villages by the Sudanese government and the militias, known as the Janjaweed, who killed, raped and looted.
READY TO DO SOMETHING?
Here's the link to donate to UNICEF-USA.
One of my favorite humanitarian organizations is American Jewish World Service. Information on their Sudan appeal is here.
If there's another humanitarian group that you prefer, donate to them. Enjoy your Memorial Day weekend.
|
Jane writes:
Where is the noise, the rumbling, the Al Gore outburst regarding the Sudan? Where's the vocal, blustering intellectual-academic-media contingent? Where are the Arab Street and Rush Limbaugh? As the world averted its eyes from the hacking machetes in Rwanda, we turn our back again on Africa. A half a million Sudanese people may die at the hands of their own government within short months and there's little screaming; we barely hear a word. Sudanese sovereignty will not be breached.
In the last year the Sudanese government has been killing its own people systematically. ...
Today's CNN story says:
For several months my colleague, Dr. Camilo Valderrama, has been raising alarm about the need for regular food distributions in this area, where nearly a fourth of the refugees that fled to Chad are seeking shelter.
...
It's May 12 and Camilo is attending to Hadiya Beshir Issa, 25, and her 15-month-old daughter Munira at an IRC health facility in Bahai. They are recent arrivals in a seemingly endless stream of refugees fleeing brutal attacks in Darfur, Sudan.
Munira hardly has the strength to open her eyes and her skin is shriveled from dehydration. Camilo says the tiny girl is severely malnourished and he instructs Hadiya how to administer oral re-hydration solution and antibiotics.
Hadiya is from a village near Kutum in northern Darfur, where the IRC is also providing humanitarian aid. She told me that a militia attacked her village last August and that her family fled to the town of Orshi, on the way to Chad.
But that town was ransacked by gunmen last month and in the chaos, Hadiya became separated from her husband and the rest of her family. She told me that she has no idea if they are still alive. After an eight-day trek, she crossed into Chad with her baby, arriving in Bahai with 17 other families.
As Hadiya recounted her story, Camilo continued to treat Munira. But in the next couple of hours, the little girl's condition rapidly deteriorated. We quickly took her to the hospital in Tine, two hours away, but doctors there couldn't even find the child's veins in order to administer intravenous liquid. She was beyond help. ...
In the BBC:
UN Emergency Relief Co-ordinator Jan Egeland said many donors failed to realise that the crisis was the biggest humanitarian drama of our time.
He said the UN still only had a 20% of the resources needed to help 2m people.
Mr Egeland criticised the Sudanese government for making it difficult for them to bring in trucks and medicines. ...
A report last month by the UN human rights commissioner described systematic attacks on villages by the Sudanese government and the militias, known as the Janjaweed, who killed, raped and looted.
READY TO DO SOMETHING?
Here's the link to donate to UNICEF-USA.
One of my favorite humanitarian organizations is American Jewish World Service. Information on their Sudan appeal is here.
If there's another humanitarian group that you prefer, donate to them. Enjoy your Memorial Day weekend.
Morning Report
is on a 72 for Memorial Day. Back Tuesday, 6/1.
|
Friday, May 28, 2004
In Memoriam
My unit, the 1st Light Armored Infantry Battalion, 1st Marine Division, lost several men in January and February of 1991. We took the first combat-related losses of the ground offensive in Desert Storm. Please take a moment to visit the memorial page of the unit veterans' website:
1st LAI fallen comrades
Thank you.
|
1st LAI fallen comrades
Thank you.
Mayfield's Faith
CORRECTION: In an earlier post, DiL incorrectly reported that Brandon Mayfield's Muslim religion was not mentioned on the FBI affidavit. In fact, as the Portland Tribune discloses, the affidavit showed more interest in Mayfield's religion than in his fingerprints (8 paragraphs to 3, respectively). Read Ben Jacklet's article at the link.
|
Bridge and Roses: May 28, 2004 - New Feature!
BRIDGE AND ROSES: News and Views from the Center of the Known Universe
Cleric wanted to start terrorist camp in Southern Oregon. Abu Hamza al-Masri, who was arrested in London Thursday, is accused of trying to set up a “real live” terrorist training camp in the remote town of Bly, according to Portland-based FBI agent Robert Jordan.
Oregonian: Arrest for Bly camp
Appeals court ruling: kiss of death for Ashcroft’s intervention? Oregonians are known to be an independent-minded lot, and in 1997 they asserted the right to exit life in a peaceful and dignified manner with the nation’s first and only law legalizing physician-assisted suicide. In 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft pitted the Federal Government against the State, declaring assisted suicide “not a legitimate medical practice”. But Ashcroft received a smackdown from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday, which ruled 2-1 that Ashcroft had overstepped his authority.
FBI case against Mayfield dissected. Brandon Mayfield, the Oregon lawyer wrongly accused by the FBI in connection with the Madrid bombing, was charged on the basis of a fingerprint that FBI investigators never looked at, according to the Portland Tribune. The article suggests that zealous Federal investigators found what they believed to be a strong match based on a computerized fingerprint, and then, on April 21, traveled to Madrid to pitch their case to the Spanish authorities, who were already expressing doubts about Mayfield. This stands in contrast to the Bureau’s more circumspect actions after a more recent, and perhaps more credible, suspect (Ouhnane Daoud) was identified by the Spanish police: this time, agents traveled to Madrid to see “exactly what the Spanish National Police were looking at”, according to the FBI’s Bob Jordan.
Tribune: Mayfield
Ameri sweeps GOP primary for House. Iranian-American businesswoman Goli Ameri won a decisive victory in the GOP primary for Oregon’s First Congressional District, where she will face Democratic incumbent David Wu in the main election. Ameri is running on a pro-business, pro-technology platform.
Goli Ameri
|
Cleric wanted to start terrorist camp in Southern Oregon. Abu Hamza al-Masri, who was arrested in London Thursday, is accused of trying to set up a “real live” terrorist training camp in the remote town of Bly, according to Portland-based FBI agent Robert Jordan.
Oregonian: Arrest for Bly camp
Appeals court ruling: kiss of death for Ashcroft’s intervention? Oregonians are known to be an independent-minded lot, and in 1997 they asserted the right to exit life in a peaceful and dignified manner with the nation’s first and only law legalizing physician-assisted suicide. In 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft pitted the Federal Government against the State, declaring assisted suicide “not a legitimate medical practice”. But Ashcroft received a smackdown from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday, which ruled 2-1 that Ashcroft had overstepped his authority.
FBI case against Mayfield dissected. Brandon Mayfield, the Oregon lawyer wrongly accused by the FBI in connection with the Madrid bombing, was charged on the basis of a fingerprint that FBI investigators never looked at, according to the Portland Tribune. The article suggests that zealous Federal investigators found what they believed to be a strong match based on a computerized fingerprint, and then, on April 21, traveled to Madrid to pitch their case to the Spanish authorities, who were already expressing doubts about Mayfield. This stands in contrast to the Bureau’s more circumspect actions after a more recent, and perhaps more credible, suspect (Ouhnane Daoud) was identified by the Spanish police: this time, agents traveled to Madrid to see “exactly what the Spanish National Police were looking at”, according to the FBI’s Bob Jordan.
Tribune: Mayfield
Ameri sweeps GOP primary for House. Iranian-American businesswoman Goli Ameri won a decisive victory in the GOP primary for Oregon’s First Congressional District, where she will face Democratic incumbent David Wu in the main election. Ameri is running on a pro-business, pro-technology platform.
Goli Ameri
Sudan progress: thanks to you, it's working.
Thanks to all those who have been participating in the Sudan campaign. According to this CNN report:
"A spokeswoman for Kofi Annan said the U.N. secretary-general will focus on stemming the fighting in western Sudan, where the lives of hundreds of thousands of people are threatened.
Annan has been flooded with requests from people across the world beseeching him to provide emergency assistance to end the killing in Darfur, spokeswoman Marie Okabe told reporters Thursday.
"The secretary-general fully shares the concerns of the public at large. ... He is following the situation in Darfur very closely and with great concern," she said.
Thanks, Jane, and all who are helping. Keep spreading the word.
|
"A spokeswoman for Kofi Annan said the U.N. secretary-general will focus on stemming the fighting in western Sudan, where the lives of hundreds of thousands of people are threatened.
Annan has been flooded with requests from people across the world beseeching him to provide emergency assistance to end the killing in Darfur, spokeswoman Marie Okabe told reporters Thursday.
"The secretary-general fully shares the concerns of the public at large. ... He is following the situation in Darfur very closely and with great concern," she said.
Thanks, Jane, and all who are helping. Keep spreading the word.
Morning Report: May 28, 2004
- Sudan: North/South accord brings hope for Darfur as well. (various) According to Sudan’s vice president Ali Osman Taha, the signing in Khartoum of a power-sharing agreement between government forces and rebels in the south of the country will also pave the way for peace in the western Darfur region, where ethnically motivated atrocites have led to a humanitarian disaster. The BBC report notes that northern and southern Sudanese mingled freely at the signing ceremony, something previously uncommon in Sudan. In the wake of the accord, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan has stated his intention to involve the United Nations in Darfur-related negotiations and humanitarian aid. Annan said he was responding to a flood of requests from around the world for the UN to intervene. However, the Head Heeb warns that “atrocities are still continuing in Darfur”.
BBC News: Sudan
CNN: Sudan
Head Heeb: Sudan
- Najaf accord doesn’t stop Kufa attack. (Fox) Despite an agreement between Shia leaders and Muqtada al-Sadr to stop hostilities, Americans came under small-arms fire in Najaf’s twin city of Kuja, and mortar shells struck a US base in Najaf.
Fox: Kufa attack
- Earthquake strikes Sari, Iran. (various) A 6.2 magnitude earthquake struck the northern Iranian city of Sari on Friday. More details will be posted upon availability.
SUDAN UPDATE. My Pet Jawa stresses that the recent peace accord will have "no impact" on the Darfur conflict (contrary to what was suggested by the BBC report).
|
BBC News: Sudan
CNN: Sudan
Head Heeb: Sudan
- Najaf accord doesn’t stop Kufa attack. (Fox) Despite an agreement between Shia leaders and Muqtada al-Sadr to stop hostilities, Americans came under small-arms fire in Najaf’s twin city of Kuja, and mortar shells struck a US base in Najaf.
Fox: Kufa attack
- Earthquake strikes Sari, Iran. (various) A 6.2 magnitude earthquake struck the northern Iranian city of Sari on Friday. More details will be posted upon availability.
SUDAN UPDATE. My Pet Jawa stresses that the recent peace accord will have "no impact" on the Darfur conflict (contrary to what was suggested by the BBC report).
Thursday, May 27, 2004
I never
post after I've had a couple of beers.
I'm just too mellow to be effective.
See you in the morning.
|
I'm just too mellow to be effective.
See you in the morning.
The New York Times Takes DiL's Advice
... well, sort of.
This blog recently offered the traditional media several pieces of advice on at least two points: (1) to pay more attention to the phenomenon of blogging; and (2) to readily admit one's past errors. It appears the New York Times has followed this advice, albeit in its own fashion. (Of course, it is just possible that these articles were in the works anyway. But I say, think positive.)
Ah, but let's look at how the Dame Grise has seen fit to interpret our sage counsel.
Shall we begin with Katie Hafner's blogging article? The Times seems to think that it can counter the threat of blogging (and make no mistake, we ARE a threat to the NYT) by writing a derisive article on it. Could the Times possible acknowledge the relevance of blogging for an audience disillusioned with the manipulations of the media? Too much to expect, I suppose. I'll have more to say on this later.
And then there was the Times' so-called "correction" of its Iraq coverage. Well, it would be nice if this "correction" included a re-assessment of the Times' anti-American bias, but that, too would be asking too much.
|
This blog recently offered the traditional media several pieces of advice on at least two points: (1) to pay more attention to the phenomenon of blogging; and (2) to readily admit one's past errors. It appears the New York Times has followed this advice, albeit in its own fashion. (Of course, it is just possible that these articles were in the works anyway. But I say, think positive.)
Ah, but let's look at how the Dame Grise has seen fit to interpret our sage counsel.
Shall we begin with Katie Hafner's blogging article? The Times seems to think that it can counter the threat of blogging (and make no mistake, we ARE a threat to the NYT) by writing a derisive article on it. Could the Times possible acknowledge the relevance of blogging for an audience disillusioned with the manipulations of the media? Too much to expect, I suppose. I'll have more to say on this later.
And then there was the Times' so-called "correction" of its Iraq coverage. Well, it would be nice if this "correction" included a re-assessment of the Times' anti-American bias, but that, too would be asking too much.
The Zionist Conspiracy
|Department of Flying Pigs
... from Little Green Footballs. Can they really mean that they want to invite ... a ... THIRD PARTY to that Muslim-Christian conference in Qatar?
And then there's this from MEMRI:
second thoughts about jihad
The end is near, people.
|
And then there's this from MEMRI:
second thoughts about jihad
The end is near, people.
Two Speeches
Jessica's Well from Midland, Texas compares notes from Bill Cosby's speech and E.L. Doctorow's. Worth reading.
|
Gay Muslims
Excellent piece by Johann Hari on gay Muslims. Expect more posts from me on gay and transgender issues soon.
|
Disaster!
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler has the news on our so-called "catastrophe" in Iraq. Go check it out.
|
How to help Iraq
Fayrouz has a new post listing humanitarian organizations that need your support. Go check it out.
|
Your attention, please.
This blog will not be carrying any coverage of VV0nk3tt3 or VV@$h1ngt0n13nn3.
Just so's you know.
|
Just so's you know.
Zeyad's Original Post on Zaydun
Please go here to read the whole story from the beginning.
Zeyad's follow-up at the end of January may be found here.
|
Zeyad's follow-up at the end of January may be found here.
Excerpts from Slate Article on Zaydun
SAMARRA, IRAQ—On the night of Jan. 3, Marwan and Zeidun, two cousins, drove a small white flatbed truck carrying ceramic floor tiles and toilets into Samarra. The truck had broken down on the way, and they were late. The curfew that day was 11 p.m., and the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps manning the checkpoint into town waved them through probably just before 11. Inside the town, close to the famous spiral minaret, they were stopped by an American patrol as curfew violators.
What happened next is disputed. But two things are clear: The truck they were driving was destroyed, and the two cousins went off a bridge into the Tigris and one of them drowned.
...
Marwan told me his story with a mixture of misery and diffidence. On the table in front of us was a photograph of him and Zeidun. They were inside a car, and Marwan, big and chubby, was laughing at something with his mouth open and his eyes merrily screwed up. The man in front of me had a different face altogether.
"They just stopped us and put us in their car. It was five minutes before curfew. Usually, missing curfew just means detention for a short time. We didn't feel strange, we had no weapons, they had just checked us. We had no idea why we were being taken."
He says they were driven to the edge of the bridge.
"We pleaded. We said we didn't know how to swim. My cousin tried to hold onto one of the soldiers. He was just laughing as he pushed him in. Two of them were pointing rifles at his forehead and chest. Four of them pushed me off toward the dam, toward the current. I only had my nose and mouth sticking out of the water. I could see the Americans standing there, pointing their guns. They wanted us to die, but I survived to testify against them. My mind was in chaos, but I remember I was very concerned about my cousin. We shouted back and forth to each other. I did as much as I could, but it was God's will. I tried to swim to him. I got hold of his hand, but he slipped away in the current. Everything moved so fast, I don't know how long I was in the river. From the shock I didn't even feel the cold."
- Read the whole thing at the link.
|
What happened next is disputed. But two things are clear: The truck they were driving was destroyed, and the two cousins went off a bridge into the Tigris and one of them drowned.
...
Marwan told me his story with a mixture of misery and diffidence. On the table in front of us was a photograph of him and Zeidun. They were inside a car, and Marwan, big and chubby, was laughing at something with his mouth open and his eyes merrily screwed up. The man in front of me had a different face altogether.
"They just stopped us and put us in their car. It was five minutes before curfew. Usually, missing curfew just means detention for a short time. We didn't feel strange, we had no weapons, they had just checked us. We had no idea why we were being taken."
He says they were driven to the edge of the bridge.
"We pleaded. We said we didn't know how to swim. My cousin tried to hold onto one of the soldiers. He was just laughing as he pushed him in. Two of them were pointing rifles at his forehead and chest. Four of them pushed me off toward the dam, toward the current. I only had my nose and mouth sticking out of the water. I could see the Americans standing there, pointing their guns. They wanted us to die, but I survived to testify against them. My mind was in chaos, but I remember I was very concerned about my cousin. We shouted back and forth to each other. I did as much as I could, but it was God's will. I tried to swim to him. I got hold of his hand, but he slipped away in the current. Everything moved so fast, I don't know how long I was in the river. From the shock I didn't even feel the cold."
- Read the whole thing at the link.
For those of you just joining us ...
... Zeyad is the Iraqi blogger responsible for the "Healing Iraq" blog. He is also responsible for helping start several other Iraqi blogs, including "The Mesopotamian", "Iraq at a Glance", and "Iraq the Model". In other words, he is the main reason we can get information about Iraq that's not distorted by the moonbat media.
Early this year, four American soldiers stopped Zeyad's cousins Zaydun and Marwan on the street shortly before curfew. They detained the two Iraqis, and then forced them at gunpoint to jump off a bridge into the Tigris - despite their protests that Zaydun couldn't swim. Zaydun's body was recovered ten days later.
Zeyad isn't anti-American (in spite of everything) but he is mad as hell. You should be too.
|
Early this year, four American soldiers stopped Zeyad's cousins Zaydun and Marwan on the street shortly before curfew. They detained the two Iraqis, and then forced them at gunpoint to jump off a bridge into the Tigris - despite their protests that Zaydun couldn't swim. Zaydun's body was recovered ten days later.
Zeyad isn't anti-American (in spite of everything) but he is mad as hell. You should be too.
Slate Story on Zaydun
|This can't wait.
Four soldiers implicated in the drowning death of Zeyad's cousin Zaydun in the Tigris have gotten off with a reprimand. The Army is claiming they're not certain if there WAS a death in the case, even though Zaydun's body washed ashore 10 days later.
Read the post here and don't forget to follow the comments.
|
Read the post here and don't forget to follow the comments.
Tuesday, May 25, 2004
Happy Shavuot
No posting for the next two days due to the Jewish holiday of Shavuot. Regular posting will resume around 10pm Pacific Time, Thursday night. Chag sameach.
|
Decalogue
“When I say that I am a Jew, I affirm the following ...”
by Rabbi Lawrence Kushner
in I Am Jewish: Personal Reflections Inspired by the Last Words of Daniel Pearl
edited by Judea and Ruth Pearl
1. The only sound my God utters is alef – the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, which has no sound, the sound of nothing. The Hebew word for “I”, anochi, begins with alef.
2. My God is not visible; my God is not invisible. My God looks like Nothing. There is Nothing to see.
3. The Name of my God is made from the root letters of the Hebrew verb to be, which are themselves vowels. It probably meant something like The One who brings into being all that is. It is the sound of Nothing – only breathing.
4. One day each week I try to pretend that the universe is done, finished, that it (and I) need nothing more to be complete.
5. My parents are the instruments God used to bring me into being. Through trying to understand and listen to them, I begin to comprehend myself.
6. Life in all its forms is sacred; in the face of each creature I see my Creator.
7. The relationship I share with my life-partner is sacred and ultimate. She is my Only One.
8. You are other than me and your things are extensions of who you are. I may not appropriate your things for myself; they are yours.
9. I respect society’s mechanisms for resolving disputes; I renounce perjury.
10. To the extent that I can rejoice in and want nothing more than what I already have, I begin to resemble my God who has, wants, and is Nothing.
|
by Rabbi Lawrence Kushner
in I Am Jewish: Personal Reflections Inspired by the Last Words of Daniel Pearl
edited by Judea and Ruth Pearl
1. The only sound my God utters is alef – the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, which has no sound, the sound of nothing. The Hebew word for “I”, anochi, begins with alef.
2. My God is not visible; my God is not invisible. My God looks like Nothing. There is Nothing to see.
3. The Name of my God is made from the root letters of the Hebrew verb to be, which are themselves vowels. It probably meant something like The One who brings into being all that is. It is the sound of Nothing – only breathing.
4. One day each week I try to pretend that the universe is done, finished, that it (and I) need nothing more to be complete.
5. My parents are the instruments God used to bring me into being. Through trying to understand and listen to them, I begin to comprehend myself.
6. Life in all its forms is sacred; in the face of each creature I see my Creator.
7. The relationship I share with my life-partner is sacred and ultimate. She is my Only One.
8. You are other than me and your things are extensions of who you are. I may not appropriate your things for myself; they are yours.
9. I respect society’s mechanisms for resolving disputes; I renounce perjury.
10. To the extent that I can rejoice in and want nothing more than what I already have, I begin to resemble my God who has, wants, and is Nothing.
UN: Sex for Food in DR Congo
By Cahal Milmo
25 May 2004
The Independent (UK)
Teenage rape victims fleeing war in the Democratic Republic of Congo are being sexually exploited by the United Nations peace-keeping troops sent to the stop their suffering. ...
Read the rest of this repulsive story here. Thanks, again, to K-Lo at The Corner.
|
25 May 2004
The Independent (UK)
Teenage rape victims fleeing war in the Democratic Republic of Congo are being sexually exploited by the United Nations peace-keeping troops sent to the stop their suffering. ...
Read the rest of this repulsive story here. Thanks, again, to K-Lo at The Corner.
Letter to the New York Times: President Bush's Speech
There may be grounds to criticize President Bush's speech (and his policies), but insufficient multilateralism is not one of them. Military assistance from more countries would be helpful, but the imprimatur of the United Nations is not, and should not be, an end in itself. The UN is not the utopian "government of mankind" that liberals like to imagine it to be; it is a corrupt, reactionary, and profoundly anti-democratic organization. The UN's emerging role in Sudan is a step in the right direction, but many more such steps will be needed to establish the UN's credibility as a force for good. Iraq cannot afford to wait.
And who decided that the situation in Iraq had become "disastrous"? That does not sound like the assessment of a US Marine officer currently serving in Iraq, who states:
"The enemy is confused right now. He goes to bed convinced he is going to win because he watches the Al Jazeera and then the US media and believes that we are a weak willed people who can be terrorized and who have a penchant for self-loathing. Then, he wakes up and he comes across a coalition check point and he sees a young Soldier or Marine who stands there like a rock and exudes strength and conviction."
Nor does the Times' gloomy picture of Iraq accord easily with the latest post from Omar, who relates:
"I wanted to share with you some of the opinions of Iraqis about their daily lives that I read on the bbc. arabic.com There were more than many comments and about 70% of them were positive. Here are some examples:
What happens these days in Iraq is a natural process as a result from the transfer from dictatorship to democracy.
Ali Ahmed-Baghdad.
I'm an Iraqi citizen and I want to thank president GWB from all my heart for the great service he's done to the Iraqi people by freeing us from one of the worst tyrants in history. ...
Kamal-Adhamya-Baghdad. ...
I had to leave Iraq because I didn't want to be one of Saddam's slaves. After so many years, I'm back to my country and I saw that people are not as nervous as they used to be. I saw hope in their eyes despite the security problems. All I have to say to our Arab brothers is,"We are practicing democracy. You keep enjoying dictatorship"
Ilham Hussain-Baghdad"
Should the President admit he made mistakes? Well, as your own William Safire wrote some weeks ago, that would be a nice gesture from all parties concerned. I'd really like to hear the press admit that it was wrong to oppose the liberation of Iraq - but I'm not holding my breath for that to happen.
As one who served with the Marines in the first Iraq war, I am immensely pleased that our forces are now finishing the job and helping the Iraqi people build a better future. It would be nice to get a little support from the media.
|
And who decided that the situation in Iraq had become "disastrous"? That does not sound like the assessment of a US Marine officer currently serving in Iraq, who states:
"The enemy is confused right now. He goes to bed convinced he is going to win because he watches the Al Jazeera and then the US media and believes that we are a weak willed people who can be terrorized and who have a penchant for self-loathing. Then, he wakes up and he comes across a coalition check point and he sees a young Soldier or Marine who stands there like a rock and exudes strength and conviction."
Nor does the Times' gloomy picture of Iraq accord easily with the latest post from Omar, who relates:
"I wanted to share with you some of the opinions of Iraqis about their daily lives that I read on the bbc. arabic.com There were more than many comments and about 70% of them were positive. Here are some examples:
What happens these days in Iraq is a natural process as a result from the transfer from dictatorship to democracy.
Ali Ahmed-Baghdad.
I'm an Iraqi citizen and I want to thank president GWB from all my heart for the great service he's done to the Iraqi people by freeing us from one of the worst tyrants in history. ...
Kamal-Adhamya-Baghdad. ...
I had to leave Iraq because I didn't want to be one of Saddam's slaves. After so many years, I'm back to my country and I saw that people are not as nervous as they used to be. I saw hope in their eyes despite the security problems. All I have to say to our Arab brothers is,"We are practicing democracy. You keep enjoying dictatorship"
Ilham Hussain-Baghdad"
Should the President admit he made mistakes? Well, as your own William Safire wrote some weeks ago, that would be a nice gesture from all parties concerned. I'd really like to hear the press admit that it was wrong to oppose the liberation of Iraq - but I'm not holding my breath for that to happen.
As one who served with the Marines in the first Iraq war, I am immensely pleased that our forces are now finishing the job and helping the Iraqi people build a better future. It would be nice to get a little support from the media.
Letter to the New York Times: Editorial Policy
Dear Mr. Feyer:
I read your essay on the role of the Letters Editor with some interest. Please allow me a few brief comments.
You note that "liberal opinion seems to dominate", at least in readers' perceptions. Remember that there's a "chicken/egg" factor at work as well: readers who see the NYT as having a "liberal bias" will be less likely to read it.
Also, the issues of today's complex world do not always reduce to a "liberal/conservative" paradigm. I'm a lifelong liberal, and - like Sen. Lieberman, the editors of The New Republic, and NYT's own Thomas Friedman - I have strongly supported the Iraq liberation. At the same time, I find that listening to conservative voices often broadens my understanding immensely - which is why I regularly read Safire, Brooks, and the National Review. And don't assume that all who support Bush's policies in the Mideast are "conservatives" and therefore (for example) oppose gay marriage, because that's simply not true.
I cringe when I hear complaints of the media's "liberal bias" because I know these complaints are partly justified - and at the same time, the "liberalism" of the media is too often a corruption of true liberalism (which was supposed to have something to do with freedom) and is instead merely an irrational anti-government vendetta.
I get most of my information from the internet nowadays, partly, as you've said, because we live in a fast-changing world. But it is also a matter of credibility. I have little reason to listen to a New York -based editor's interpretation of the supposedly "disastrous" course of events in Iraq when I can get much more detailed and relevant information from Iraqis like Zeyad and Omar. While they are sometimes critical of certain aspects of US policy, their attitude is: "This is a good thing. Let's make it work." I don't get a similar impression from the press.
There are also a few anti-American blogs like Riverbend and Salam Pax (although Salam is no longer as anti-American as he used to be). These have generated discussion and debate on sites like "Up A River" and "Cry Me A Riverbend II". If you spend some time here, you will see that most Americans genuinely want to help Iraq and are receptive to constructive criticism of Government policies - but we are also able to distinguish that from anti-American propaganda.
So these are some of the reasons why I get most of my information from the internet rather than the traditional press. And by the way, your article came to my attention through my fellow blogger Jane.
(By the way, the perceived hostility of the press to the struggle for freedom is not a product of the imagination of disguntled neocons. There has been very harsh criticism of the Western press from the Iraqi sites mentioned above, as well as the Iranian dissident website and many other international sources.)
Thank you for taking the time to read this message. I do keep a blog of my own, but I am a fan of print media and I believe that fine newspapers like the Times can continue to be relevant in today's world. But in order to retain their audience, they must demonstrate that they are in touch with the world.
Asher Abrams
Portland, Oregon
|
I read your essay on the role of the Letters Editor with some interest. Please allow me a few brief comments.
You note that "liberal opinion seems to dominate", at least in readers' perceptions. Remember that there's a "chicken/egg" factor at work as well: readers who see the NYT as having a "liberal bias" will be less likely to read it.
Also, the issues of today's complex world do not always reduce to a "liberal/conservative" paradigm. I'm a lifelong liberal, and - like Sen. Lieberman, the editors of The New Republic, and NYT's own Thomas Friedman - I have strongly supported the Iraq liberation. At the same time, I find that listening to conservative voices often broadens my understanding immensely - which is why I regularly read Safire, Brooks, and the National Review. And don't assume that all who support Bush's policies in the Mideast are "conservatives" and therefore (for example) oppose gay marriage, because that's simply not true.
I cringe when I hear complaints of the media's "liberal bias" because I know these complaints are partly justified - and at the same time, the "liberalism" of the media is too often a corruption of true liberalism (which was supposed to have something to do with freedom) and is instead merely an irrational anti-government vendetta.
I get most of my information from the internet nowadays, partly, as you've said, because we live in a fast-changing world. But it is also a matter of credibility. I have little reason to listen to a New York -based editor's interpretation of the supposedly "disastrous" course of events in Iraq when I can get much more detailed and relevant information from Iraqis like Zeyad and Omar. While they are sometimes critical of certain aspects of US policy, their attitude is: "This is a good thing. Let's make it work." I don't get a similar impression from the press.
There are also a few anti-American blogs like Riverbend and Salam Pax (although Salam is no longer as anti-American as he used to be). These have generated discussion and debate on sites like "Up A River" and "Cry Me A Riverbend II". If you spend some time here, you will see that most Americans genuinely want to help Iraq and are receptive to constructive criticism of Government policies - but we are also able to distinguish that from anti-American propaganda.
So these are some of the reasons why I get most of my information from the internet rather than the traditional press. And by the way, your article came to my attention through my fellow blogger Jane.
(By the way, the perceived hostility of the press to the struggle for freedom is not a product of the imagination of disguntled neocons. There has been very harsh criticism of the Western press from the Iraqi sites mentioned above, as well as the Iranian dissident website and many other international sources.)
Thank you for taking the time to read this message. I do keep a blog of my own, but I am a fan of print media and I believe that fine newspapers like the Times can continue to be relevant in today's world. But in order to retain their audience, they must demonstrate that they are in touch with the world.
Asher Abrams
Portland, Oregon
Best of Blogdad
BEST OF BLOGDAD: OUR EYES IN IRAQ
from Iraq the Model, November 2003
on the media:
"To be honest, I won’t say that the media are lying but they are telling only one side of the truth.
This side usually reflects the attitude of the funding source of that particular station or journal towards the events in Iraq.
So I’ll try to show you the naked truth about daily life in Iraq.
And I will try to show you the difference between pre. And post. Liberation Iraq.
I will put it in some form of a series, discussing one aspect of life in each post.
Let’s talk first about security and order in Iraq, as this is a major point of concern.
Some TV channels try to show our streets like battlefields, actually they are not. the streets are relatively safe and one can walk in the streets with no fear greater than the one he feels if he was in any other country. People go to work regularly, stores and restaurants are open even to a late hour in the night. crime levels in Iraq according to IP reports are declining and they’re now much lower than they were In April or May this year.
The main point that satisfies me is that I no longer fear the risk of death penalty because of something I said.
Do you imagine that someone could get tortured and executed just because he laughed at a joke about Saddam or the Baath ?
Statistics from the reports of the red-cross and the IP state that approximately 1570 Iraqis were killed in violent accidents in Baghdad during the first 5 months following the liberation.
Some would say, well , this is sad. This is a large number of casualties. And this is true.
But if you take any 5 months during the reign of Saddam you will find that the number will reach to an average of 30 000 kills in Baghdad alone , I don’t want to bother you with math.work but if someone thinks that I’m lying then I can show you the whole calculation steps.
On health care:
I promised to tell you about different aspects of life in Iraq before and after the liberation, so today I'll be writing about another aspect (HEALTH CARE)
To those who think that conditions in Iraq nowadays are worse than they were under Saddan's regime, here are some notes involving the Medicare in Iraq before and after the war based on the events and facts I had witnessed during my 5 year service in the medical field before and after the war:-
1-before the war there was a system called "self financing" that was applied in almost all the hospitals and health centers. As one may imagine that the term must mean that each hospital should be responsible and independent in its financial affairs, actually what it meant was a much different formula.
Each hospital charged high prices for medications and medical services as compared to the average income of the Iraqis at that time, but this is not the major problem, as this system is used in many countries, the problem was that 20 % of these funds were taken to cover the defect in the military budget and 40 % were taken back to the treasury (Saddam's pocket) and this was the regular and officially documented system.
The remaining 40 % were supposed to cover the expenses of the hospital and to pay for the medical staff and other employees.
Today, the (self financing) system no longer works in pediatric hospitals( children under the age of 12 are treated without charging any fees). For older patients, however the system still works but after a 50 % discount of the prices and the funds no longer related to the salaries of the staff.
The whole money goes back to the treasury and the whole needs of the hospital is provided by the treasury, taking in consideration the 6-10 folds rise in the salaries of most employees and with the exchange value of the Iraqi Dinar to the Dollar being 1: 2000 which is very close to that before the war you can see the benefit for both the patients and the health workers, the former paying less and the latter getting more.
2- the most important change is that most of the emergency medications were provided in an amount that was far from being adequate. I used to go to the hospital for my night calls and the pharmacist comes and gives me the list of the remaining drugs, and I find that it contained only a single diazepam injection, three or four ampicilline injections with a few syrups and some times a single injection of hydrocortisone. This was not the case always, but this was the usual condition with very few exceptions.
I had to turn into a magician or a warlock to treat all the patients who come to the hospital, the no. of whom was by no way small knowing that it was the major hospital in al -Kut , one of the 18 Iraqi governorates in which over a 100 thousand people live.
The similar condition applied for most hospitals in Iraq with few exceptions.
Most of the chemotherapeutics used for treating malignant tumors were not available in hospitals and they were sold in the black market with prices reaching a 100 $ for the single injection (a fortune for most Iraqis at that time) forcing some families to sell their cars, furniture and sometimes their houses to keep the faint flame of life in their loved ones' hearts.
Today almost all of the emergency medications are available in all the hospitals and in more than a sufficient amount.
Almost all the chemotherapeutics are available for free for all age groups in most of the major Iraqi hospitals.
3- every one or two months we (the junior doctors) were forced to spend a week or two in Saddam's fedayeen camps and the so-called al-Quds(Jerusalem)army camps to supervise their (Dobermans’) health.
I recall when of my colleagues didn't show for 1 day, a military police unit was sent to his house where he was dragged (still in his pajamas) to the camp, he was told to choose between wearing a military uniform, holding a rifle to guard a spot for 24 hours, and spending 3 days in jail.
4- The police protection was near to nil. When a patient dies due to the lack of drugs or any other natural cause his shocked relatives would find no one but the poor doctor in duty to throw all their anger and frustration on, a phenomena mounted in numerous cases to the use of fists and boots and sometimes knives.
Today the junior doctors are free as all Iraqis are and no one compels them to do anything beyond their legal and moral responsibilities. The military service has become voluntary and even started to gain some appeal, after it was considered for along time as hell on earth for most Iraqis.
In every hospital there's a full FPS(facility protection service) unit to keep order and peace and to protect all the hospital employees.
5- The salaries of dentists rose from approximately 5 $(no, there are no missing digits!) to about 120 $ and those of the junior doctors and nurses from approximately 20 $ (again, no missing digits) to 120-180 $.
I know it's still a very low figure, but it's a good step forwards, putting in mind that most of the prices are still the same, with imported goods getting cheaper and local goods rising about 1.5 - 2 times the price before the war, and we were promised a big raise with the beginning of the next year. Besides we're not in a hurry, as we know that our country is passing through a very difficult economic distress, with all the huge debts, their interests and the money needed for reconstruction which demands some sacrifice and patience on our side.
And in case the GC do not fulfill their promises, well, we're not afraid any more and we will demonstrate, protest and keep the pressure until we get what we deserve.
There are no more torture rooms, no more mass graves and we will make sure that it remains so.
|
from Iraq the Model, November 2003
on the media:
"To be honest, I won’t say that the media are lying but they are telling only one side of the truth.
This side usually reflects the attitude of the funding source of that particular station or journal towards the events in Iraq.
So I’ll try to show you the naked truth about daily life in Iraq.
And I will try to show you the difference between pre. And post. Liberation Iraq.
I will put it in some form of a series, discussing one aspect of life in each post.
Let’s talk first about security and order in Iraq, as this is a major point of concern.
Some TV channels try to show our streets like battlefields, actually they are not. the streets are relatively safe and one can walk in the streets with no fear greater than the one he feels if he was in any other country. People go to work regularly, stores and restaurants are open even to a late hour in the night. crime levels in Iraq according to IP reports are declining and they’re now much lower than they were In April or May this year.
The main point that satisfies me is that I no longer fear the risk of death penalty because of something I said.
Do you imagine that someone could get tortured and executed just because he laughed at a joke about Saddam or the Baath ?
Statistics from the reports of the red-cross and the IP state that approximately 1570 Iraqis were killed in violent accidents in Baghdad during the first 5 months following the liberation.
Some would say, well , this is sad. This is a large number of casualties. And this is true.
But if you take any 5 months during the reign of Saddam you will find that the number will reach to an average of 30 000 kills in Baghdad alone , I don’t want to bother you with math.work but if someone thinks that I’m lying then I can show you the whole calculation steps.
On health care:
I promised to tell you about different aspects of life in Iraq before and after the liberation, so today I'll be writing about another aspect (HEALTH CARE)
To those who think that conditions in Iraq nowadays are worse than they were under Saddan's regime, here are some notes involving the Medicare in Iraq before and after the war based on the events and facts I had witnessed during my 5 year service in the medical field before and after the war:-
1-before the war there was a system called "self financing" that was applied in almost all the hospitals and health centers. As one may imagine that the term must mean that each hospital should be responsible and independent in its financial affairs, actually what it meant was a much different formula.
Each hospital charged high prices for medications and medical services as compared to the average income of the Iraqis at that time, but this is not the major problem, as this system is used in many countries, the problem was that 20 % of these funds were taken to cover the defect in the military budget and 40 % were taken back to the treasury (Saddam's pocket) and this was the regular and officially documented system.
The remaining 40 % were supposed to cover the expenses of the hospital and to pay for the medical staff and other employees.
Today, the (self financing) system no longer works in pediatric hospitals( children under the age of 12 are treated without charging any fees). For older patients, however the system still works but after a 50 % discount of the prices and the funds no longer related to the salaries of the staff.
The whole money goes back to the treasury and the whole needs of the hospital is provided by the treasury, taking in consideration the 6-10 folds rise in the salaries of most employees and with the exchange value of the Iraqi Dinar to the Dollar being 1: 2000 which is very close to that before the war you can see the benefit for both the patients and the health workers, the former paying less and the latter getting more.
2- the most important change is that most of the emergency medications were provided in an amount that was far from being adequate. I used to go to the hospital for my night calls and the pharmacist comes and gives me the list of the remaining drugs, and I find that it contained only a single diazepam injection, three or four ampicilline injections with a few syrups and some times a single injection of hydrocortisone. This was not the case always, but this was the usual condition with very few exceptions.
I had to turn into a magician or a warlock to treat all the patients who come to the hospital, the no. of whom was by no way small knowing that it was the major hospital in al -Kut , one of the 18 Iraqi governorates in which over a 100 thousand people live.
The similar condition applied for most hospitals in Iraq with few exceptions.
Most of the chemotherapeutics used for treating malignant tumors were not available in hospitals and they were sold in the black market with prices reaching a 100 $ for the single injection (a fortune for most Iraqis at that time) forcing some families to sell their cars, furniture and sometimes their houses to keep the faint flame of life in their loved ones' hearts.
Today almost all of the emergency medications are available in all the hospitals and in more than a sufficient amount.
Almost all the chemotherapeutics are available for free for all age groups in most of the major Iraqi hospitals.
3- every one or two months we (the junior doctors) were forced to spend a week or two in Saddam's fedayeen camps and the so-called al-Quds(Jerusalem)army camps to supervise their (Dobermans’) health.
I recall when of my colleagues didn't show for 1 day, a military police unit was sent to his house where he was dragged (still in his pajamas) to the camp, he was told to choose between wearing a military uniform, holding a rifle to guard a spot for 24 hours, and spending 3 days in jail.
4- The police protection was near to nil. When a patient dies due to the lack of drugs or any other natural cause his shocked relatives would find no one but the poor doctor in duty to throw all their anger and frustration on, a phenomena mounted in numerous cases to the use of fists and boots and sometimes knives.
Today the junior doctors are free as all Iraqis are and no one compels them to do anything beyond their legal and moral responsibilities. The military service has become voluntary and even started to gain some appeal, after it was considered for along time as hell on earth for most Iraqis.
In every hospital there's a full FPS(facility protection service) unit to keep order and peace and to protect all the hospital employees.
5- The salaries of dentists rose from approximately 5 $(no, there are no missing digits!) to about 120 $ and those of the junior doctors and nurses from approximately 20 $ (again, no missing digits) to 120-180 $.
I know it's still a very low figure, but it's a good step forwards, putting in mind that most of the prices are still the same, with imported goods getting cheaper and local goods rising about 1.5 - 2 times the price before the war, and we were promised a big raise with the beginning of the next year. Besides we're not in a hurry, as we know that our country is passing through a very difficult economic distress, with all the huge debts, their interests and the money needed for reconstruction which demands some sacrifice and patience on our side.
And in case the GC do not fulfill their promises, well, we're not afraid any more and we will demonstrate, protest and keep the pressure until we get what we deserve.
There are no more torture rooms, no more mass graves and we will make sure that it remains so.
The Iraqi Holocaust
THE IRAQI HOLOCAUST: AL-DUJAIL
by Dr. Firas M. Yaqub
posted on Iraq the Model
-"Al-Dujaile is my home town, I always looked at it as god's heaven on earth, it's about 60 kilometers to the north of Baghdad, on the bank of al Ishaki river (a branch of Tigris), inhabited by few thousands, most of whom are farmers, our village is well known by its date palms and grapes, a fascinating nature that takes your breath away, its people are related by strong tribal relations that keep them as one large family.
- Date: 7/8/1982, Saddam decides to visit the village, the Ba’ath party in the region prepared the people to make a big reception, they took us out of the schools(I was 7 years old). They made us line in a row on both sides of the road to wave for him and cheer his name. It never occurred to me that it would be my last day in the childhood world. I was forced to skip that period of my life with such cruelty that I can not explain.
-17 of the finest young men in the village had decided to put an end to the tyrant's life at that day, they had the courage to face him, we didn't know about their intention.
The brave men set an ambush among the palm trees, they couldn't tell which car was his, there were dozens of cars, all identical in model and color.
-The attack starts, the brave young men open fire from their simple weapons, some of the body guards get killed, others wounded, the tyrant get panicked, imagine that (Saddam is afraid) the man who enjoyed terrorizing people lives a moment of fear with all its details, he was so close to death this time.
8 of the attackers were killed, the rest fled out of the country.
(Woe to the sinners) who dared to make him scared, you should fear his revenge, you should learn the lesson so that it won't happen again, you should bow more and more and fear more and more, you should be scared to death so that you don't dare even to think of harming him; the shadow of god on earth.
-The answer was fast, one hour after the escape of the tyrant, we had to face his anger, I heard the sound of helicopters over our heads wreaking their vengeance upon our small village, backed later with shovels that leveled the trees with the ground, the order was clear(the terror should be great) so that the others would learn.
I ran away to my home into my mothers' lap, my younger brother and sisters gathered around me, I realized something huge has happened and anticipated the eminent evil. it didn't take long for the security to get to our house, we were taken to the unknown, me, my mother(who was 4 months pregnant), my sisters Einas(5 years), Zeina(3 years)and my brother Mohammed(1 year).
-The first station in our long journey was Al-Hakimiyah prison that belongs to the intelligence, I found hundreds of my village people, old, young, men, women and children, we were 480 there. Out of whom 80 were relatives of mine.
It was enough to say the word Hakimiyah for any Iraqi to be completely paralyzed(the one who gets in is a missing-the one who gets out is reborn-this was what we used to say about this prison, the walls of which tell thousands of horror stories that you refuse to believe.
I was too young to know why we were treated like that, but I sure knew the meaning of being scared to death. The sound of foot steps that stops by the door was enough for every one to freeze, as after that the door would be opened, a name of one of the men would be announced and he would be dragged to the interrogation room to return few hours later unconscious, covered by blood, wrapped in a blanket, and would be thrown on us.
The women and children had their share, and this is what saw: extraction of nails and teeth, electric shocks, whipping with lashes, using razors to tear the skin into shreds, my aunt was left hanging from the roof after her clothes had been wrapped of her in front of her brothers to force them to talk. Do you know how much pain we suffered? Can you imagine? I doubt it.
We stayed at Al-Hakimiyah for one month, the space was too small for all of us to sleep, some of us had to stay on their feet so that the others could sleep.
-After that we were transferred to Abu-Ghraib prison, where we met the men for the last time, after that, the 143 men separated from us and then transferred to another place, as for the rest of us, we were kept in Abu-Ghraib prison for six months, during that time, the day for my mother to deliver her baby came, she had complications and they didn't take her to the hospital until it was too late, the baby died. my mother never if it was a boy or a girl.
In the prison, 4 people died, my grandfather(Yousif Ya'koob), my uncles wife(Noofa Hasan), the old man(Abdul Wahab Ja'far) and his wife (Sabreya), after that we were transferred to a camp in the desert, near the Iraqi-Saudi borders, 400 kilometers south-west to Baghdad(Leeah camp).
We spent four years there.
Four years in hell, we were isolated from the world, all we could do is stay alive and pray for the men whom their destiny was unknown to us.
We were released in 1986, only for another journey of pain and suffering. We had to start a new life as all our properties were confiscated and we still don’t know anything about the men.
The other good people in our village helped us, offered us jobs in their lands and a place to stay in. I had to work -with my little brother and sisters- to earn our living and to continue with our study. Farming is too hard a job for children of our age, but we had already passed that stage.
It’s hard to explain what life is when you're a suspect with the eyes of security agents following you, stifling your breath, making your life even harder and harder, we had to give them all the pennies we could save to get some information about the missing ones, and they always promised us good news, and that our beloved ones were alive and being treated well. we didn't believe that, but what is life without hope!?
-Sixteen years later...October/2002. I finished medical school and started to practice my job as a doctor in Baghdad. The same year, Saddam suffers a hard time, the USA and the allies tighten the circle around him, he decides to set all prisoners free, including the political. That was what he said, the fact; he released only the murderers and the thieves.
Our cries lost their way trying to find our relatives among the thousands of faces, each time they reassure us that there would be another group to be released the next day, but all our efforts were in vain, we had no one but god to pray to and seek his help to show us the way.
Date: 4/9/2003, I can’t believe it, the tyrant falls, is it a dream?
Does it mean no more fear, no more terror, and no more death? We jumped into the streets wreaking our vengeance on his pictures and statues that surrounded the village he raped in a dark night.
The towns and villages expelled him and expelled his name……..WE WERE SAVED.
I took a deep breath, the air had the scent of freedom, nothing can be more beautiful, it’s difficult to describe, but we were overwhelmed by happiness, with only one distress: where had our beloved ones gone?
We started to search the security departments in Baghdad,- like thousands of Iraqis- looking for a trace, I didn’t take a long time, we found what we were looking for. The documents of the crime, I read with tears in my eyes; the presidency order dated: 7 /23 /1985, signed by the tyrant, ordering the execution of 143 men from Al-Dujaile, the youngest one (Najeeb Abd Kadim) 11 years old. Among these, 35 were relatives of mine.
God bless your souls martyrs, may you have peace in heaven, if it wasn’t your courage and blood we wouldn’t be proud.
This is the story behind these photos, my friend. It’s time they have a decent funeral. We haven’t found their remains yet, but they will always remain in our hearts”
My friend surprised me saying” we don’t regret what happened, and yesterday, when the nine remaining heroes returned to Iraq, we met them with flowers, as the heroes of all the Iraqis, and we will never blame them, as they’re the ones who kept our chins up
|
by Dr. Firas M. Yaqub
posted on Iraq the Model
-"Al-Dujaile is my home town, I always looked at it as god's heaven on earth, it's about 60 kilometers to the north of Baghdad, on the bank of al Ishaki river (a branch of Tigris), inhabited by few thousands, most of whom are farmers, our village is well known by its date palms and grapes, a fascinating nature that takes your breath away, its people are related by strong tribal relations that keep them as one large family.
- Date: 7/8/1982, Saddam decides to visit the village, the Ba’ath party in the region prepared the people to make a big reception, they took us out of the schools(I was 7 years old). They made us line in a row on both sides of the road to wave for him and cheer his name. It never occurred to me that it would be my last day in the childhood world. I was forced to skip that period of my life with such cruelty that I can not explain.
-17 of the finest young men in the village had decided to put an end to the tyrant's life at that day, they had the courage to face him, we didn't know about their intention.
The brave men set an ambush among the palm trees, they couldn't tell which car was his, there were dozens of cars, all identical in model and color.
-The attack starts, the brave young men open fire from their simple weapons, some of the body guards get killed, others wounded, the tyrant get panicked, imagine that (Saddam is afraid) the man who enjoyed terrorizing people lives a moment of fear with all its details, he was so close to death this time.
8 of the attackers were killed, the rest fled out of the country.
(Woe to the sinners) who dared to make him scared, you should fear his revenge, you should learn the lesson so that it won't happen again, you should bow more and more and fear more and more, you should be scared to death so that you don't dare even to think of harming him; the shadow of god on earth.
-The answer was fast, one hour after the escape of the tyrant, we had to face his anger, I heard the sound of helicopters over our heads wreaking their vengeance upon our small village, backed later with shovels that leveled the trees with the ground, the order was clear(the terror should be great) so that the others would learn.
I ran away to my home into my mothers' lap, my younger brother and sisters gathered around me, I realized something huge has happened and anticipated the eminent evil. it didn't take long for the security to get to our house, we were taken to the unknown, me, my mother(who was 4 months pregnant), my sisters Einas(5 years), Zeina(3 years)and my brother Mohammed(1 year).
-The first station in our long journey was Al-Hakimiyah prison that belongs to the intelligence, I found hundreds of my village people, old, young, men, women and children, we were 480 there. Out of whom 80 were relatives of mine.
It was enough to say the word Hakimiyah for any Iraqi to be completely paralyzed(the one who gets in is a missing-the one who gets out is reborn-this was what we used to say about this prison, the walls of which tell thousands of horror stories that you refuse to believe.
I was too young to know why we were treated like that, but I sure knew the meaning of being scared to death. The sound of foot steps that stops by the door was enough for every one to freeze, as after that the door would be opened, a name of one of the men would be announced and he would be dragged to the interrogation room to return few hours later unconscious, covered by blood, wrapped in a blanket, and would be thrown on us.
The women and children had their share, and this is what saw: extraction of nails and teeth, electric shocks, whipping with lashes, using razors to tear the skin into shreds, my aunt was left hanging from the roof after her clothes had been wrapped of her in front of her brothers to force them to talk. Do you know how much pain we suffered? Can you imagine? I doubt it.
We stayed at Al-Hakimiyah for one month, the space was too small for all of us to sleep, some of us had to stay on their feet so that the others could sleep.
-After that we were transferred to Abu-Ghraib prison, where we met the men for the last time, after that, the 143 men separated from us and then transferred to another place, as for the rest of us, we were kept in Abu-Ghraib prison for six months, during that time, the day for my mother to deliver her baby came, she had complications and they didn't take her to the hospital until it was too late, the baby died. my mother never if it was a boy or a girl.
In the prison, 4 people died, my grandfather(Yousif Ya'koob), my uncles wife(Noofa Hasan), the old man(Abdul Wahab Ja'far) and his wife (Sabreya), after that we were transferred to a camp in the desert, near the Iraqi-Saudi borders, 400 kilometers south-west to Baghdad(Leeah camp).
We spent four years there.
Four years in hell, we were isolated from the world, all we could do is stay alive and pray for the men whom their destiny was unknown to us.
We were released in 1986, only for another journey of pain and suffering. We had to start a new life as all our properties were confiscated and we still don’t know anything about the men.
The other good people in our village helped us, offered us jobs in their lands and a place to stay in. I had to work -with my little brother and sisters- to earn our living and to continue with our study. Farming is too hard a job for children of our age, but we had already passed that stage.
It’s hard to explain what life is when you're a suspect with the eyes of security agents following you, stifling your breath, making your life even harder and harder, we had to give them all the pennies we could save to get some information about the missing ones, and they always promised us good news, and that our beloved ones were alive and being treated well. we didn't believe that, but what is life without hope!?
-Sixteen years later...October/2002. I finished medical school and started to practice my job as a doctor in Baghdad. The same year, Saddam suffers a hard time, the USA and the allies tighten the circle around him, he decides to set all prisoners free, including the political. That was what he said, the fact; he released only the murderers and the thieves.
Our cries lost their way trying to find our relatives among the thousands of faces, each time they reassure us that there would be another group to be released the next day, but all our efforts were in vain, we had no one but god to pray to and seek his help to show us the way.
Date: 4/9/2003, I can’t believe it, the tyrant falls, is it a dream?
Does it mean no more fear, no more terror, and no more death? We jumped into the streets wreaking our vengeance on his pictures and statues that surrounded the village he raped in a dark night.
The towns and villages expelled him and expelled his name……..WE WERE SAVED.
I took a deep breath, the air had the scent of freedom, nothing can be more beautiful, it’s difficult to describe, but we were overwhelmed by happiness, with only one distress: where had our beloved ones gone?
We started to search the security departments in Baghdad,- like thousands of Iraqis- looking for a trace, I didn’t take a long time, we found what we were looking for. The documents of the crime, I read with tears in my eyes; the presidency order dated: 7 /23 /1985, signed by the tyrant, ordering the execution of 143 men from Al-Dujaile, the youngest one (Najeeb Abd Kadim) 11 years old. Among these, 35 were relatives of mine.
God bless your souls martyrs, may you have peace in heaven, if it wasn’t your courage and blood we wouldn’t be proud.
This is the story behind these photos, my friend. It’s time they have a decent funeral. We haven’t found their remains yet, but they will always remain in our hearts”
My friend surprised me saying” we don’t regret what happened, and yesterday, when the nine remaining heroes returned to Iraq, we met them with flowers, as the heroes of all the Iraqis, and we will never blame them, as they’re the ones who kept our chins up
Ayatollah Ebadi Courts the UN
A recent SMCCDI news release states that Shirin Ebadi, the turncoat Iranian "activist" and regime apologist, is the official guest at a "cocktail party" hosted by the IRI regime at the United Nations in New York. The article notes her ties to the Kerry campaign, and in particular to Kerry fundraiser Hassan Nemazee, who has sued SMCCDI.
|
The Iraqi Holocaust
THE IRAQI HOLOCAUST: DENIAL
“In his last dark meditation, just before taking his own life, Primo Levi wrote of the people who have survived unfathomable acts of cruelty:
Almost all the survivors [of the Holocaust], orally or in their written memoirs, remember a dream which frequently recurred during the nights of imprisonment, vaied in its detail but uniform in its substance: they had returned home an with passion and relief were describing their past sufferings, addressing themselves to a loved one, and were not believed, indeed were not even listened to. In the most typical (and cruellest) form, the interlocutor turned and left in silence.
If cruelty is individual, then silence is collective. It arises from the actions of many individuals working, consciously or unconsciously, as a group. Breaking with silence as a way of dealing with the legacy of cruelty is thus itself necessarily a collective act. While the cruelties described ... were going on, the Arab intellectuals who could have made a difference if they had put their minds to it were silent.”
- Kanan Makiya, Cruelty and Silence
|
“In his last dark meditation, just before taking his own life, Primo Levi wrote of the people who have survived unfathomable acts of cruelty:
Almost all the survivors [of the Holocaust], orally or in their written memoirs, remember a dream which frequently recurred during the nights of imprisonment, vaied in its detail but uniform in its substance: they had returned home an with passion and relief were describing their past sufferings, addressing themselves to a loved one, and were not believed, indeed were not even listened to. In the most typical (and cruellest) form, the interlocutor turned and left in silence.
If cruelty is individual, then silence is collective. It arises from the actions of many individuals working, consciously or unconsciously, as a group. Breaking with silence as a way of dealing with the legacy of cruelty is thus itself necessarily a collective act. While the cruelties described ... were going on, the Arab intellectuals who could have made a difference if they had put their minds to it were silent.”
- Kanan Makiya, Cruelty and Silence
Bush Speech "Less Than Expectations" - GC Members
This AP article reports that GC members were unimpressed by President Bush's speech on the future of Iraq:
"We found it less than our expectations," Iraqi Governing Council president Ghazi Mashal Ajil al-Yawer (search) told reporters after a gathering to discuss the resolution.
Council member Ahmad Chalabi (search) went further, saying the draft resolution "will fail the test for Iraqi sovereignty."
Iraq's defense minister, Ali Allawi (search), said he expects Iraq's security forces to be ready to replace foreign soldiers within a year.
"The timing of a presence of a multinational force, it is a question of months rather than years," Allawi said in London at a news conference with British Defense Minister Geoff Hoon. "The multinational force will need to be replaced by an indigenous force, an Iraqi force, in the course of a year."
He said an Iraqi security force should be in place "by and large" before national elections set for January. ...
Read the whole thing at the link.
|
"We found it less than our expectations," Iraqi Governing Council president Ghazi Mashal Ajil al-Yawer (search) told reporters after a gathering to discuss the resolution.
Council member Ahmad Chalabi (search) went further, saying the draft resolution "will fail the test for Iraqi sovereignty."
Iraq's defense minister, Ali Allawi (search), said he expects Iraq's security forces to be ready to replace foreign soldiers within a year.
"The timing of a presence of a multinational force, it is a question of months rather than years," Allawi said in London at a news conference with British Defense Minister Geoff Hoon. "The multinational force will need to be replaced by an indigenous force, an Iraqi force, in the course of a year."
He said an Iraqi security force should be in place "by and large" before national elections set for January. ...
Read the whole thing at the link.
"Secret Watchers" series - Portland Tribune
|The Secret Watchers - Portland (Oregon) Tribune
This story appeared in the Portland Tribune in 2002 and is particularly relevant today. While the agency involved was the Portland Police Bureau, rather than any Federal organization, it's a sobering reminder of how power can be abused. (One amusing sidenote: a "suspicious" young woman whose photograph appeared in the secret files - her offense was supporting the grape boycott in 1968 - was none other than Vera Katz ... by now the mayor of Portland!)
|
Mayfield Link - Portland Tribune
A very fine twice-weekly local newspaper, the Portland Tribune covers the Mayfield story here. In 2002, the Tribune exposed the excesses of a clandestine surveillance program by the Portland Police Bureau in an award-winning series of articles.
|
Oregon Resident Cleared of Link to Spain Bomb
Brandon Mayfield, the 37-year-old lawyer accused of links with the Madrid bombing on the basis of a fingerprint, has been released from travel restrictions and has been given a formal apology by the FBI. Apparently the FBI's case against Mayfield rested on a poor-quality fingerprint, a wife who had made the mistake of being born in Egypt, and having represented Jeffrey Leon Battle - later identified as one of the "Portland Seven" - in a child custody case. Oh, and Mayfield was a Muslim. But the affidavit against him didn't mention that.
We can and must win the war on terrorism. Locking up innocent Americans helps no one but the terrorists. Mayfield is mad as hell - who wouldn't be? I'll post more on this later.
|
We can and must win the war on terrorism. Locking up innocent Americans helps no one but the terrorists. Mayfield is mad as hell - who wouldn't be? I'll post more on this later.
"Why didn't somebody do something?"
THE IRAQI HOLOCAUST
The Question
My mother grew up in the 1930s and '40s, and she could always remember watching the newsreels that came out after WWII. The pictures of the death camps, and the emaciated prisoner, and the stacked bodies, and the crematoriums. She would ask aloud, "If we knew all of that was going on, why didn't we stop Hitler sooner? Why didn't somebody do something?"
We had Hitler. In our own day, in our own time, in our own generation, we had Hitler. We had Saddam Hussein. And somebody "did something": President Bush, despite strong opposition at home and abroad, overthrew the Ba'athist Reich in Iraq and captured Saddam and his henchmen.
Had the "peace movement" had its way, Saddam would still be filling those mass graves. People would still be dying slow and horrible deaths in torture chambers, women and men would still be traumatized for life by sadistic rapes and disfigurements. And yet these things have ended in Iraq, precisely because of the war that the "peace" activists so strenuously opposed.
And even now, some people are unmoved by three hundred thousand bodies in mass graves. These are the same people who would have cared nothing about dead and dying Jews in concentration camps sixty years ago. I don't get it. Do they not see Arabs and Jews as human?
|
The Question
My mother grew up in the 1930s and '40s, and she could always remember watching the newsreels that came out after WWII. The pictures of the death camps, and the emaciated prisoner, and the stacked bodies, and the crematoriums. She would ask aloud, "If we knew all of that was going on, why didn't we stop Hitler sooner? Why didn't somebody do something?"
We had Hitler. In our own day, in our own time, in our own generation, we had Hitler. We had Saddam Hussein. And somebody "did something": President Bush, despite strong opposition at home and abroad, overthrew the Ba'athist Reich in Iraq and captured Saddam and his henchmen.
Had the "peace movement" had its way, Saddam would still be filling those mass graves. People would still be dying slow and horrible deaths in torture chambers, women and men would still be traumatized for life by sadistic rapes and disfigurements. And yet these things have ended in Iraq, precisely because of the war that the "peace" activists so strenuously opposed.
And even now, some people are unmoved by three hundred thousand bodies in mass graves. These are the same people who would have cared nothing about dead and dying Jews in concentration camps sixty years ago. I don't get it. Do they not see Arabs and Jews as human?
"The day we found the mass grave is vivid to me still. ... "
THE IRAQI HOLOCAUST:
Memory
"We found it up near the Iranian boarder. Very quickly people came from miles and miles away. We stood and watched the family members digging up bones and clutching remains as they sat in the dirt, rocked back and forth and cried. They were adamant that we should come over and look as they dug them up. Every single body had its hands and feet wired together with ROMEX. Each skull had a bullet hole in it except for a few that were smashed with a club or rifle butt. There were clearly men but also women and children. The grave never made the news as there were no media with us and it was small by Iraq standards. One detail that I found particularly outrageous was that the assassins left the identifications on the bodies as if they were so arrogant that it never occurred that someday, someone would dig up the bodies and hold them accountable. I will never forget it."
- Quoted by Zayphar from a US serviceman's letters home. Read the whole post. Thanks to Jane.
|
Memory
"We found it up near the Iranian boarder. Very quickly people came from miles and miles away. We stood and watched the family members digging up bones and clutching remains as they sat in the dirt, rocked back and forth and cried. They were adamant that we should come over and look as they dug them up. Every single body had its hands and feet wired together with ROMEX. Each skull had a bullet hole in it except for a few that were smashed with a club or rifle butt. There were clearly men but also women and children. The grave never made the news as there were no media with us and it was small by Iraq standards. One detail that I found particularly outrageous was that the assassins left the identifications on the bodies as if they were so arrogant that it never occurred that someday, someone would dig up the bodies and hold them accountable. I will never forget it."
- Quoted by Zayphar from a US serviceman's letters home. Read the whole post. Thanks to Jane.
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Wedding Party
... may be found at Belmont Club.
|
Monday, May 24, 2004
Morning Report update
Morning report will be cancelled tomorrow, Tuesday May 25, due to illness, and will be off-duty on Wednesday and Thursday for the Shavuot holiday. MR will return on Friday.
|
Morning Report: May 24, 2004
- The three tribes fight over Iraq. (Safire/NYT) William Safire analyzes the power play behind the Chalabi raid.
- How do you tell when spies are lying? (Ledeen/NRO) Stealing a page from Safire’s script, Michael Ledeen consults with a departed counterterrorism expert on the question of Chalabi’s alleged duplicity.
- Do all roads lead to Tehran? (Ackerman/TNR) The New Republic’s Spencer Ackerman maintains that Chalabi bit off more than he could chew by courting the Iranian regime, alienating even his former supporters in Washington.
- Beyond Chalabi. (Ali / Iraq the Model) In perhaps the most sensible response to the Chalabi debacle, Ali argues that the whole affair has been given too much prominence. Chalabi’s legitimacy derived from his support for the cause of freedom; having abandoned that cause, he lost his base of support both in Iraq and in Washington. He was “just a man who had some chance to play a role in the future of Iraq and blew it away,” Ali writes. “Chalabi was not really pro-American because he was not pro-Iraqi in the first place. He was just pro-Chalabi.”
|
- How do you tell when spies are lying? (Ledeen/NRO) Stealing a page from Safire’s script, Michael Ledeen consults with a departed counterterrorism expert on the question of Chalabi’s alleged duplicity.
- Do all roads lead to Tehran? (Ackerman/TNR) The New Republic’s Spencer Ackerman maintains that Chalabi bit off more than he could chew by courting the Iranian regime, alienating even his former supporters in Washington.
- Beyond Chalabi. (Ali / Iraq the Model) In perhaps the most sensible response to the Chalabi debacle, Ali argues that the whole affair has been given too much prominence. Chalabi’s legitimacy derived from his support for the cause of freedom; having abandoned that cause, he lost his base of support both in Iraq and in Washington. He was “just a man who had some chance to play a role in the future of Iraq and blew it away,” Ali writes. “Chalabi was not really pro-American because he was not pro-Iraqi in the first place. He was just pro-Chalabi.”
Sunday, May 23, 2004
At last!
No event of recent days has been more eagerly anticipated by DiL than William Safire's Monday column, explaining the mechanics and machinations of the Chalabi raid. Safire reveals the roots of both State's and Agency's animus towards Chalabi, as well as the role of Robert Blackwill in advancing Brahimi - who demanded the withdrawal from Falluja as well as the blacklisting of Chalabi. I'm too tired to post in detail tonight, but it's worth reading.
|
Jane is commemorated
with a square in central Kablogh (holy city of Blogistan)!
|
Map of the World
at Politburo. Is good, da?
|
Reader Participation: Chalabi Raid and Iran Regime
Rubin and Ledeen are furious.
Wretchard cites the Telegraph's article linking Chalabi with the UN scandal and Brahimi.
Who's right? Is Chalabi guilty as charged? Or is he the scapegoat in some power struggle?
If anyone has new information, insights, or clues about the background and implications of the Chalabi raid, I'd love to hear it. Post to comments.
|
Wretchard cites the Telegraph's article linking Chalabi with the UN scandal and Brahimi.
Who's right? Is Chalabi guilty as charged? Or is he the scapegoat in some power struggle?
If anyone has new information, insights, or clues about the background and implications of the Chalabi raid, I'd love to hear it. Post to comments.
Baghdad Photos
Asmar has sent in a link to this wonderful site with pictures of Baghdad. There are many photos on one page, so be advised (especially if you use low-end gear like I do) that it takes a while to load.
But it's worth the wait! There are many beautiful photographs (flowers, artwork, architecture, monuments) and some not-so-beautiful (explosion that killed GC member, Iraqi children maimed by Allied bombing). A very fine collection - please visit this site.
UPDATE: Apparently Asmar is an Iranian trying to pass as an Iraqi blogger. See Tom Villars' notice in the "Donation Info" section of ITM.
|
But it's worth the wait! There are many beautiful photographs (flowers, artwork, architecture, monuments) and some not-so-beautiful (explosion that killed GC member, Iraqi children maimed by Allied bombing). A very fine collection - please visit this site.
UPDATE: Apparently Asmar is an Iranian trying to pass as an Iraqi blogger. See Tom Villars' notice in the "Donation Info" section of ITM.
Morning Report: May 23, 2004
- US forces enter Kufa. (Fox) American forces battled the militia of Muqtada al-Sadr in Muqty’s stronghold of Kufa on Sunday night, with 18 known fatalities. Fox reports that there was also fighting in Najaf, but Karbala was quiet.
- Ali on “real Iraqis.” (Iraq the Model) Ali ponders the meaning of an anti-American demonstration in Lebanon, organized by Hezbollah, which drew a half-million people purportedly in solidarity with the “oppressed Iraqis”.
- Bush and the three elephants. (Belmont Club) When President Bush addresses the Army War College tomorrow (Monday), he will do so in the shadow of three “elephants in the living room”, Wretchard says. These are the unacknowledged proxy war with Syria, that with Iran, and the UN corruption scandal. The last item is the most interesting, because the BC cites a claim that Chalabi “is in possession of ... documents with the potential to expose politicians, corporations and the United Nations”. More on this angle to follow.
- Bush and the three blunders. (Ledeen/NRO) Michael Ledeen looks at events of recent weeks, and he’s not happy with what he sees. “We have adopted our enemies’ view of the world,” this article begins. Referring the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal, Ledeen writes that “torture, and the belief in its efficacy, are the way our enemies think.” Fallujah was “a strategic retreat,” which will embodeden our enemies to attack us again – while some “crackpot realists” in the military and senior officials in State and Defense propose adopting the “Fallujah model” in the future. Finally, Ledeen says that Chalabi was “an Iraqi leader of unquestioned democratic convictions”, who was seen as a threat by both our enemies and the CIA and State Department, precisely for that reason: “he is independent and while he is happy to work with [CIA and State], he will not work for them.” Ledeen argues that only a firm commitment to democratic ideals, and not appeasement (or emulation) of our enemies, will win this war.
- Arab summit: road to nowhere? (Debka) As reported here on May 4, the Arab League looks to be headed for the dustbin of history. The summit, finally getting off the ground in Tunis after being rescheduled, is proving to be less than the impressive show of unity its supporters might have hoped for. Debka now reports that only 13 of 22 leaders showed up, and Libya’s Moammar Qaddafi walked out after a half-hour.
|
- Ali on “real Iraqis.” (Iraq the Model) Ali ponders the meaning of an anti-American demonstration in Lebanon, organized by Hezbollah, which drew a half-million people purportedly in solidarity with the “oppressed Iraqis”.
- Bush and the three elephants. (Belmont Club) When President Bush addresses the Army War College tomorrow (Monday), he will do so in the shadow of three “elephants in the living room”, Wretchard says. These are the unacknowledged proxy war with Syria, that with Iran, and the UN corruption scandal. The last item is the most interesting, because the BC cites a claim that Chalabi “is in possession of ... documents with the potential to expose politicians, corporations and the United Nations”. More on this angle to follow.
- Bush and the three blunders. (Ledeen/NRO) Michael Ledeen looks at events of recent weeks, and he’s not happy with what he sees. “We have adopted our enemies’ view of the world,” this article begins. Referring the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal, Ledeen writes that “torture, and the belief in its efficacy, are the way our enemies think.” Fallujah was “a strategic retreat,” which will embodeden our enemies to attack us again – while some “crackpot realists” in the military and senior officials in State and Defense propose adopting the “Fallujah model” in the future. Finally, Ledeen says that Chalabi was “an Iraqi leader of unquestioned democratic convictions”, who was seen as a threat by both our enemies and the CIA and State Department, precisely for that reason: “he is independent and while he is happy to work with [CIA and State], he will not work for them.” Ledeen argues that only a firm commitment to democratic ideals, and not appeasement (or emulation) of our enemies, will win this war.
- Arab summit: road to nowhere? (Debka) As reported here on May 4, the Arab League looks to be headed for the dustbin of history. The summit, finally getting off the ground in Tunis after being rescheduled, is proving to be less than the impressive show of unity its supporters might have hoped for. Debka now reports that only 13 of 22 leaders showed up, and Libya’s Moammar Qaddafi walked out after a half-hour.
Thursday, May 20, 2004
Thank you,
whoever you are, wherever you are, for reading my blog. I like to write, and it's fun to know there's somebody out there reading it. My Site Meter informs me that the hits are, indeed, trickling in. Thank you to the persons in Canada, Saudi Arabia, the Netherlands, Australia, Mexico, Singapore, Czech Republic, and even my home state of Connecticut - as well as many places I haven't mentioned or that weren't identified by the Site Meter. Sometimes yours truly wonders why she ever got herself into this ... but it is rewarding to know people are actually reading my ramblings.
Special thanks to Jane.
|
Special thanks to Jane.
DiL Celebrates One Month
Dreams Into Lightning will mark its first month of operation tomorrow, Friday, May 21.
I will be taking some time AFK (Away From Komputer) to recharge, so there will be little or no posting today and tomorrow. Regular posting, including Morning Report, will resume on Sunday, May 23.
|
I will be taking some time AFK (Away From Komputer) to recharge, so there will be little or no posting today and tomorrow. Regular posting, including Morning Report, will resume on Sunday, May 23.
That Wedding Party
Washington: US helicopter strike alleged to have struck wedding party was directed against safe house in al Qaim 25 km from Syrian border occupied by foreign Arab fighters infiltrating Iraq from Syria, who fired at helicopter. Coalition ground forces found quantities of explosives, foreign passports, 2 m Iraqi and Syria dinars and satcom radio. Iraqi sources claimed more than 40 killed. International Red Cross condemns US military for using excessive force in incident.
- source: Debka
|
- source: Debka
Tuesday, May 18, 2004
Genetic Cause of Male Homosexuality Found
Recent research indicates that nearly all male homosexuals carry a Y chromosome, an abnormality virtually absent in lesbians and even heterosexual women.
It is not yet known whether the condition is curable.
|
It is not yet known whether the condition is curable.
Monday, May 17, 2004
Apocalypse Averted
A Small Victory reports that, contrary to some expectations, the world did not come to an end as a result of a certain development in Massachussetts.
Imagine my relief.
|
Imagine my relief.
Armed Forces Day
ARMED FORCES DAY: Those People
Early last year, Anthony Swofford, the author of Jarhead, gave a reading at Powell’s on Hawthorne. In the standing-room-only audience waiting for the reading to begin, I found myself next to an attractive, nicely dressed, fiftyish woman and we struck up a conversation. No doubt mistaking me for a fellow member of the anti-war crowd (I do tend to look like a hippie), she offered her observations on how “those people see everything in black and white”. Those people? “The right-wingers, the Bush crowd.” It was good to know who “those people” were; but what of the fighting men? “Well, you know, when you take some 19-year-old kid from Nebraska who doesn’t have any choices, and tell him ‘This is what it means to be a man’, I guess it must sound pretty appealing.”
I spent ten years in the enlisted ranks of America’s armed forces: six years in the Air Force, mostly as a communications specialist and later four years in the Marine Corps as a missileman in an armored infantry unit. My liberal parents did not, I am quite sure, ever picture me in the Marines, but they were quite supportive when I enlisted at age 26 ... at least, once they got over the initial shock.
The Air Force hitch came right after high school: I had really good test scores, and I went in on a contract enlistment to become a translator (a “208” in Air Force jargon). I finished the rigorous Korean Basic program at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, but wasn’t quite equal to the advanced training at Goodfellow Air Force Base in Texas, which involved long, tedious hours of listening to ... well, never mind, you’re not missing anything. The Government had already spent tons of money getting me a secuirty clearance, so I was reassigned to a job in telecommunications – and that was what I did for the rest of my six years in the USAF.
After hanging up my blue shirt I moved to San Francisco, where I made a living – barely – as an office clerk. I struggled to make ends meet, living in a ten-foot hotel room with a bathroom in the hall, roaches on the floor, and crackheads roaming the halls. The cost of living in San Francisco kept going up, and my paycheck didn’t, so in 1989 I found myself in the recruiter’s office once again, and this time – sort of on a dare to myself – I enlisted in the Marines.
I’ve written elsewhere about my experiences in Desert Storm. Here I’ll just say that I’m proud of my role in liberating Kuwait, and sorry only that we did not finish the job and liberate Iraq then. But my four years in the Marines were among the most rewarding of my life, and I regret none of it.
What I wish is that our well-dressed, well-educated liberals would make the effort to get rid of their stereotypes about who joins the military and why. By dismissing me as “some kid from Nebraska” or whatever part of the country you consider to be where the hicks and rednecks live, you only betray your own ignorance and prejudice. After all, "those people" don't really believe in working for the greater good, do they?
This is for you, the lady who holds me and my fellow veterans in contempt: How dare you? How dare you imagine that your university degree and your liberal credentials give you the right to think for me?
|
Early last year, Anthony Swofford, the author of Jarhead, gave a reading at Powell’s on Hawthorne. In the standing-room-only audience waiting for the reading to begin, I found myself next to an attractive, nicely dressed, fiftyish woman and we struck up a conversation. No doubt mistaking me for a fellow member of the anti-war crowd (I do tend to look like a hippie), she offered her observations on how “those people see everything in black and white”. Those people? “The right-wingers, the Bush crowd.” It was good to know who “those people” were; but what of the fighting men? “Well, you know, when you take some 19-year-old kid from Nebraska who doesn’t have any choices, and tell him ‘This is what it means to be a man’, I guess it must sound pretty appealing.”
I spent ten years in the enlisted ranks of America’s armed forces: six years in the Air Force, mostly as a communications specialist and later four years in the Marine Corps as a missileman in an armored infantry unit. My liberal parents did not, I am quite sure, ever picture me in the Marines, but they were quite supportive when I enlisted at age 26 ... at least, once they got over the initial shock.
The Air Force hitch came right after high school: I had really good test scores, and I went in on a contract enlistment to become a translator (a “208” in Air Force jargon). I finished the rigorous Korean Basic program at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, but wasn’t quite equal to the advanced training at Goodfellow Air Force Base in Texas, which involved long, tedious hours of listening to ... well, never mind, you’re not missing anything. The Government had already spent tons of money getting me a secuirty clearance, so I was reassigned to a job in telecommunications – and that was what I did for the rest of my six years in the USAF.
After hanging up my blue shirt I moved to San Francisco, where I made a living – barely – as an office clerk. I struggled to make ends meet, living in a ten-foot hotel room with a bathroom in the hall, roaches on the floor, and crackheads roaming the halls. The cost of living in San Francisco kept going up, and my paycheck didn’t, so in 1989 I found myself in the recruiter’s office once again, and this time – sort of on a dare to myself – I enlisted in the Marines.
I’ve written elsewhere about my experiences in Desert Storm. Here I’ll just say that I’m proud of my role in liberating Kuwait, and sorry only that we did not finish the job and liberate Iraq then. But my four years in the Marines were among the most rewarding of my life, and I regret none of it.
What I wish is that our well-dressed, well-educated liberals would make the effort to get rid of their stereotypes about who joins the military and why. By dismissing me as “some kid from Nebraska” or whatever part of the country you consider to be where the hicks and rednecks live, you only betray your own ignorance and prejudice. After all, "those people" don't really believe in working for the greater good, do they?
This is for you, the lady who holds me and my fellow veterans in contempt: How dare you? How dare you imagine that your university degree and your liberal credentials give you the right to think for me?
The Iraqi Holocaust
THE IRAQI HOLOCAUST: More from Sam's charge sheet:
13. Burning body by Cigarettes
14. Hanging body from the arms which are tied to the back and hanging a heavy stone in the penis and the testes which could be increased until he confesses.
15. Udy and Qusay Saddam and Some other relatives like the brothers of Sajeda Telfah Saddam's wife used to go to Abo Ghareeb Prison and select haphazardly a group from the prisoners and execute them while laughing in front of the others.
This is what the peace protesters marched to defend. Let's think about that for a moment. These are the things that the "Don't Attack Iraq" crowd devoted their energies to preserve. But wait; it gets better.
16. Decapitating children in front of their mothers.
Are you proud of yourselves, ANSWER, for defending this?
|
13. Burning body by Cigarettes
14. Hanging body from the arms which are tied to the back and hanging a heavy stone in the penis and the testes which could be increased until he confesses.
15. Udy and Qusay Saddam and Some other relatives like the brothers of Sajeda Telfah Saddam's wife used to go to Abo Ghareeb Prison and select haphazardly a group from the prisoners and execute them while laughing in front of the others.
This is what the peace protesters marched to defend. Let's think about that for a moment. These are the things that the "Don't Attack Iraq" crowd devoted their energies to preserve. But wait; it gets better.
16. Decapitating children in front of their mothers.
Are you proud of yourselves, ANSWER, for defending this?
Rice to Qureia: Palestine yes, Arafat no
... according to the latest bulletin on Debka.
The leftists who keep lumping "Bush and Sharon" together might stop by the Debka page some time and get a sense of how much distance separates Sharon and the Israeli right from America's pro-Palestinian president (and the first President to explicitly support a sovereign Palestinian state).
|
The leftists who keep lumping "Bush and Sharon" together might stop by the Debka page some time and get a sense of how much distance separates Sharon and the Israeli right from America's pro-Palestinian president (and the first President to explicitly support a sovereign Palestinian state).
Chemical Weapons Found in Iraq
I know. I'm as shocked as you are.
A Small Victory is on the case.
Oh, and don't miss this. Have you ever - well, never mind, I won't ask. I'll just confess for myself: Yes, I do admit to occasionally, still, even now, humming the tune to Neil Diamond's "America". OK, now stop laughing and go read ASV. This post is magnificent.
|
A Small Victory is on the case.
Oh, and don't miss this. Have you ever - well, never mind, I won't ask. I'll just confess for myself: Yes, I do admit to occasionally, still, even now, humming the tune to Neil Diamond's "America". OK, now stop laughing and go read ASV. This post is magnificent.
Taheri: Say No to the UN
"From 1990 to 2003, the U.N. was officially at war against Saddam Hussein; it passed 18 mandatory resolutions on Iraq. But it did nothing to implement any of those resolutions, except through the Oil-for-Food scam in which $4 billion disappeared in corrupt deals that involved senior U.N. officials.
So what is the rationale for putting the U.N. in charge in Iraq, even for a single day?"
This from the latest article by Amir Taheri. Taheri, who recently told us more than we really needed to know about the long history of decapitation, brings us up to speed on the battle between Iraq's people and its would-be occupiers. The skinny: don't let the UN take over. Read the whole article at the link.
|
So what is the rationale for putting the U.N. in charge in Iraq, even for a single day?"
This from the latest article by Amir Taheri. Taheri, who recently told us more than we really needed to know about the long history of decapitation, brings us up to speed on the battle between Iraq's people and its would-be occupiers. The skinny: don't let the UN take over. Read the whole article at the link.
Shy No More
Recently returned from an idyllic spring vacation in Shiraz, one of the writers at View From Iran notes that "it's fun not to be shy" among the outgoing Iranians. She also describes her encounters with the numerous Western tourists, including a Dutch lad named Joop.
|
A Day in the Life
Ginmar prefers to avoid explosions. (Really, what's WRONG with her?!)
Also don't miss her latest posts at A View From A Broad.
|
Also don't miss her latest posts at A View From A Broad.
Hope for Seven Iraqi Amputees
The indispensable Fayrouz brings us news of seven Iraqi men whose hands were amputated by Saddam's regime. Why doesn't their story interest the media?
|
The L Word: Are you a lberal?
THE L WORD: LIBERALISM IN CRISIS
Are you a liberal?
Do you believe in freedom?
Do you believe in a future where women, gays, and people of all faiths and traditions are free to be who they are without fear?
Do you believe in the beautiful and infinite diversity of humankind, our cultures and our individual lives?
Do you reject the failures of the past, and do you despise the regimes that keep entire nations in chains?
Do you believe that the smiling, clean-cut collaborators share the perpetrators’ guilt?
Do you hold a healthy skepticism for the institutions of “culture”, and do you yet believe that the richness of our lives comes from the wealth of culture, high and low, that is available to us?
Do you chafe at the pretensions of the elite classes, and do you still believe that all people, mighty and humble, may partake of the humanity that makes us divine and the divinity that makes us human?
Do you rebel against the abuse of power, and do you still believe that power may be used wisely and justly?
Do you believe that we can change for the better, that with good will, faith, careful thought, and courage we can build the world we want?
And do you remember that the word “liberal” means a believer in freedom?
|
Are you a liberal?
Do you believe in freedom?
Do you believe in a future where women, gays, and people of all faiths and traditions are free to be who they are without fear?
Do you believe in the beautiful and infinite diversity of humankind, our cultures and our individual lives?
Do you reject the failures of the past, and do you despise the regimes that keep entire nations in chains?
Do you believe that the smiling, clean-cut collaborators share the perpetrators’ guilt?
Do you hold a healthy skepticism for the institutions of “culture”, and do you yet believe that the richness of our lives comes from the wealth of culture, high and low, that is available to us?
Do you chafe at the pretensions of the elite classes, and do you still believe that all people, mighty and humble, may partake of the humanity that makes us divine and the divinity that makes us human?
Do you rebel against the abuse of power, and do you still believe that power may be used wisely and justly?
Do you believe that we can change for the better, that with good will, faith, careful thought, and courage we can build the world we want?
And do you remember that the word “liberal” means a believer in freedom?
Excellent Abu Ghraib article
by Jane Novak, in Arab News. Read it here.
|
Upcoming Events
As noted below, I'm going to be taking a short break from writing Morning Report. Sifting through the news headlines on a daily basis is more gruelling than you might think. Nevertheless I consider MR an important part of this blog and intend to continue posting it regularly, resuming on Sunday.
Meanwhile, I'm preparing posts on the following topics:
- gay marriage
- Armed Forces Day
- the continuation of my series on Kabbalah
- liberalism and the freedom movement
- Oregon events, including the Spain suspect and the Goldschmidt scandal
- and of course, unfolding events in the Mideast and around the world.
If I can get all of that under control by the end of the week, I may even take a short break from blogging.
Stay tuned.
|
Meanwhile, I'm preparing posts on the following topics:
- gay marriage
- Armed Forces Day
- the continuation of my series on Kabbalah
- liberalism and the freedom movement
- Oregon events, including the Spain suspect and the Goldschmidt scandal
- and of course, unfolding events in the Mideast and around the world.
If I can get all of that under control by the end of the week, I may even take a short break from blogging.
Stay tuned.
Morning Report: May 17, 2004
Morning Report will be on leave starting tomorrow (Tuesday) for the rest of this week, to allow me to get caught up with other planned posting and then take a short break. Morning Report will return, together with regular posting on DiL, on Sunday, May 23.
- Iraqi GC leader assassinated. (various) Izzidine Salim (also known as Abdel-Zaraa Othman), the president of the Iraqi Governing Council, was killed by a bomb on Monday morning at about 9:45am local time. Several other Iraqis were also killed in the explosion, which occurred about 200 meters from a Green Zone checkpoint. The GC chose Ghazi Mashal Ajil al-Yawer, due to assume the rotating presidency in June, to succeed Salim; he is to serve until the handover of sovereignty on June 30. Paul Bremer recalled that Salim “strove for the downfall of the former regime and the birth of a democratic Iraq.” French President Jacques Chirac declared that the incident left him “as convinced as ever that there is no military solution” in Iraq.
- Gay marriages recognized in Massachussetts. (Fox) Contrary to the Fox News headline, the gay marriages set to begin today in Massachussetts will not be “America’s first same-sex weddings”, but they will be the first ones legally recognized by the state.
|
- Iraqi GC leader assassinated. (various) Izzidine Salim (also known as Abdel-Zaraa Othman), the president of the Iraqi Governing Council, was killed by a bomb on Monday morning at about 9:45am local time. Several other Iraqis were also killed in the explosion, which occurred about 200 meters from a Green Zone checkpoint. The GC chose Ghazi Mashal Ajil al-Yawer, due to assume the rotating presidency in June, to succeed Salim; he is to serve until the handover of sovereignty on June 30. Paul Bremer recalled that Salim “strove for the downfall of the former regime and the birth of a democratic Iraq.” French President Jacques Chirac declared that the incident left him “as convinced as ever that there is no military solution” in Iraq.
- Gay marriages recognized in Massachussetts. (Fox) Contrary to the Fox News headline, the gay marriages set to begin today in Massachussetts will not be “America’s first same-sex weddings”, but they will be the first ones legally recognized by the state.
Sunday, May 16, 2004
The Kabbalah
THE KABBALAH – Part 2
When I was in my mid-teens, my mother gave me my first book about Kabbalah. It was “The Book of Letters” by Lawrence Kushner. You have to see this book: it’s bound in natural colored cloth, printed on cream-colored paper; it’s not typeset, but written in the author’s hand in plain and elegant English and Hebrew calligraphy. There is a copy of the book on my lap, next to my computer keyboard, as I write this. I cannot imagine being without this book.
“Alef is the first letter. It has no sound ...” So begins the book, quietly, like the first letter. “Open your mouth and begin to make a sound. STOP! That is Alef.” At once, intuitively, you know where Kushner is taking you. You’re going to go to the beginning, the place before sound, the place before thought. You’re going to learn new words – and not just the words themselves, or even just their meanings, you are going to learn a new way of thinking.
Over the next fifty-five pages (it is a short book) we learn more than 200 Hebrew words: words like echad (one), bayit (house), hinneni (here I am), sefer (book), and tzedek (righteousness). We also learn that “you cannot pronounce the letter Tet until you go out early in the spring morning and see the dew (tal). Only when you secretly confess to yourself that you really do not understand how the tiny droplets of water have come to be, are you permitted to be cleansed in them.”
Growing up in Rabbi Kushner’s New England, I knew well the chill of the dew on bare feet in the morning, at that time in spring when school is not quite over, but you can at least forget about it long enough to watch the shimmer of the early sun on those droplets. And maybe you weren’t happy in school, and maybe your home life wasn’t so good either, but could put it out of your mind when you saw the dew glistening on the blades of grass.
What was I feeling at those moments? I don’t know. I know that at other times, I was feeling “Shevirat ha-Kelim. The discord and confusion which is the beginning of growing. And then trying to get it all back together again.” So life was not meant to be easy: this much was clear. But what could be broken and shattered could also be mended: “Tikkun. Mending. The repair of the universe.” I didn’t understand what it all meant, but I wanted to find out.
Now there’s another book in front of me: big, square, and slick, printed in eye-popping day-glow colors and metallic silver. The title is “The 72 Names of God – Technology for the Soul (TM)” and the dust jacket informs me that the book is a “National Bestseller”. Its author, Yehuda Berg, is “an ordained Rabbi and is internationally-renowned as a leading authority of Kabbalah.”
The Forword informs us that “the 72 Names are a technology for asserting the power of human consciousness over physicality.” The book is quite emphatic about the “technology” aspect, in fact, using the word ten times in the two-page foreword (and four times in the first paragraph alone).
So it is a technology. Well. If it is a technology, then it must be practical, efficient, and reliable. I certainly hope it works better than my AOL dial-up or Windows Millennium Edition.
But if it is a technology, then it must also be inscrutable. Anything technological has already been theorized, understood, studied, researched and developed, and is now in full production, ready for consumer use. Science – or what used to be called “natural philosophy” – belongs to the conjoined realms of understanding and experience. Technology, by definition, does not ask to be understood or even thought about; only used. Did your computer come with a brochure explaining the fine points of silicon doping and photolithography? Neither did mine.
What are the 72 Names? They are combinations of three Hebrew letters each, derived from Exodus 14:19-21 by a simple algorithm (one letter from each verse, in order, reading the middle verse backward). The book promises that by meditating faithfully on the various letter combinations, certain specific effects can be achieved. Of course, there is a stipulation: the Names will not do anything for you unless you commit to “proactive behavior” and renounce “ego games”.
Well and good: the 72 Names of God help them who help themselves. But these little tricks – being proactive and dealing with that nuisance called the ego – does the book offer us any practical advice regarding these things? Is it not astonishing that whole shelves of self-help books, even entire religions, have been devoted to these tasks, yet Berg offers us not so much as a handful of pointers for keeping the mind and body still during meditation, or winning friends and influencing people?
And conversely: once we’ve got will and ego under control, what will the 72 Names do for us that mere meditation, prayer, study, and action alone will not? On this point, too, the book is resolutely silent.
But let me stop nitpicking over the book; now I want to visit Yossi Kein Halevi’s article on Yehuda Berg and his Kabbalah Centre.
(End of Part 2)
|
When I was in my mid-teens, my mother gave me my first book about Kabbalah. It was “The Book of Letters” by Lawrence Kushner. You have to see this book: it’s bound in natural colored cloth, printed on cream-colored paper; it’s not typeset, but written in the author’s hand in plain and elegant English and Hebrew calligraphy. There is a copy of the book on my lap, next to my computer keyboard, as I write this. I cannot imagine being without this book.
“Alef is the first letter. It has no sound ...” So begins the book, quietly, like the first letter. “Open your mouth and begin to make a sound. STOP! That is Alef.” At once, intuitively, you know where Kushner is taking you. You’re going to go to the beginning, the place before sound, the place before thought. You’re going to learn new words – and not just the words themselves, or even just their meanings, you are going to learn a new way of thinking.
Over the next fifty-five pages (it is a short book) we learn more than 200 Hebrew words: words like echad (one), bayit (house), hinneni (here I am), sefer (book), and tzedek (righteousness). We also learn that “you cannot pronounce the letter Tet until you go out early in the spring morning and see the dew (tal). Only when you secretly confess to yourself that you really do not understand how the tiny droplets of water have come to be, are you permitted to be cleansed in them.”
Growing up in Rabbi Kushner’s New England, I knew well the chill of the dew on bare feet in the morning, at that time in spring when school is not quite over, but you can at least forget about it long enough to watch the shimmer of the early sun on those droplets. And maybe you weren’t happy in school, and maybe your home life wasn’t so good either, but could put it out of your mind when you saw the dew glistening on the blades of grass.
What was I feeling at those moments? I don’t know. I know that at other times, I was feeling “Shevirat ha-Kelim. The discord and confusion which is the beginning of growing. And then trying to get it all back together again.” So life was not meant to be easy: this much was clear. But what could be broken and shattered could also be mended: “Tikkun. Mending. The repair of the universe.” I didn’t understand what it all meant, but I wanted to find out.
Now there’s another book in front of me: big, square, and slick, printed in eye-popping day-glow colors and metallic silver. The title is “The 72 Names of God – Technology for the Soul (TM)” and the dust jacket informs me that the book is a “National Bestseller”. Its author, Yehuda Berg, is “an ordained Rabbi and is internationally-renowned as a leading authority of Kabbalah.”
The Forword informs us that “the 72 Names are a technology for asserting the power of human consciousness over physicality.” The book is quite emphatic about the “technology” aspect, in fact, using the word ten times in the two-page foreword (and four times in the first paragraph alone).
So it is a technology. Well. If it is a technology, then it must be practical, efficient, and reliable. I certainly hope it works better than my AOL dial-up or Windows Millennium Edition.
But if it is a technology, then it must also be inscrutable. Anything technological has already been theorized, understood, studied, researched and developed, and is now in full production, ready for consumer use. Science – or what used to be called “natural philosophy” – belongs to the conjoined realms of understanding and experience. Technology, by definition, does not ask to be understood or even thought about; only used. Did your computer come with a brochure explaining the fine points of silicon doping and photolithography? Neither did mine.
What are the 72 Names? They are combinations of three Hebrew letters each, derived from Exodus 14:19-21 by a simple algorithm (one letter from each verse, in order, reading the middle verse backward). The book promises that by meditating faithfully on the various letter combinations, certain specific effects can be achieved. Of course, there is a stipulation: the Names will not do anything for you unless you commit to “proactive behavior” and renounce “ego games”.
Well and good: the 72 Names of God help them who help themselves. But these little tricks – being proactive and dealing with that nuisance called the ego – does the book offer us any practical advice regarding these things? Is it not astonishing that whole shelves of self-help books, even entire religions, have been devoted to these tasks, yet Berg offers us not so much as a handful of pointers for keeping the mind and body still during meditation, or winning friends and influencing people?
And conversely: once we’ve got will and ego under control, what will the 72 Names do for us that mere meditation, prayer, study, and action alone will not? On this point, too, the book is resolutely silent.
But let me stop nitpicking over the book; now I want to visit Yossi Kein Halevi’s article on Yehuda Berg and his Kabbalah Centre.
(End of Part 2)
The Kabbalah
THE KABBALAH – Part 1
You remember how it was when you were a small child? How everything was new and full of wonder? Even if you had a hard childhood, your mind would open from time to time, everything around you would fall away, and you felt yourself joined with something higher. You know what I’m talking about. Don’t tell me you don’t remember.
Even as a young adult, when you were first exploring new books and music, love and sex, you had the nagging feeling that there was something behind it all, some kind of secret – not quite like the secret codes you played with as a child, but still a way of changing and hiding a deeper message. And maybe you tried to find clues to this message in your Scriptures, or in science, or in art and literature, and you felt you almost had it, but it still eluded you.
And there were bills to pay, kids to raise, endless meetings and interviews and hasty late-night dinners in front of the television before you dropped off to sleep exhausted. You found the answers that worked for you, and they worked well enough, and you stopped asking the questions, not because you didn’t care anymore, but just because you had other things to do.
So here you are. Maybe now you’re at what they call middle age (whatever that means) and you start counting your birthdays in terms of how many down, how many to go. You wonder what comes next. In those private moments you’ve never spoken of to anyone, you wonder why you bother at all. You’re tired – tired of everything, all the time. You catch yourself thinking that if something happened to you, and you didn’t have to do this anymore, perhaps it wouldn’t be an altogether bad thing. An early retirement, you could say ... and then the alarm clock rings, and it’s time to do it all again.
What brought us here, and why? We’ve looked for answers to these questions in books, you and I, and we know that none of the answers we’ve found have been satisfactory. What we need is not for someone to hand us a diagram with our place clearly marked in the Master Plan (although let’s admit it, that would be nice, woudn’t it?) – what we really need is to learn a new way of thinking. Or maybe it’s an old way of thinking. Or maybe it’s a way of not-thinking.
Or maybe ...
(End of Part 1)
|
You remember how it was when you were a small child? How everything was new and full of wonder? Even if you had a hard childhood, your mind would open from time to time, everything around you would fall away, and you felt yourself joined with something higher. You know what I’m talking about. Don’t tell me you don’t remember.
Even as a young adult, when you were first exploring new books and music, love and sex, you had the nagging feeling that there was something behind it all, some kind of secret – not quite like the secret codes you played with as a child, but still a way of changing and hiding a deeper message. And maybe you tried to find clues to this message in your Scriptures, or in science, or in art and literature, and you felt you almost had it, but it still eluded you.
And there were bills to pay, kids to raise, endless meetings and interviews and hasty late-night dinners in front of the television before you dropped off to sleep exhausted. You found the answers that worked for you, and they worked well enough, and you stopped asking the questions, not because you didn’t care anymore, but just because you had other things to do.
So here you are. Maybe now you’re at what they call middle age (whatever that means) and you start counting your birthdays in terms of how many down, how many to go. You wonder what comes next. In those private moments you’ve never spoken of to anyone, you wonder why you bother at all. You’re tired – tired of everything, all the time. You catch yourself thinking that if something happened to you, and you didn’t have to do this anymore, perhaps it wouldn’t be an altogether bad thing. An early retirement, you could say ... and then the alarm clock rings, and it’s time to do it all again.
What brought us here, and why? We’ve looked for answers to these questions in books, you and I, and we know that none of the answers we’ve found have been satisfactory. What we need is not for someone to hand us a diagram with our place clearly marked in the Master Plan (although let’s admit it, that would be nice, woudn’t it?) – what we really need is to learn a new way of thinking. Or maybe it’s an old way of thinking. Or maybe it’s a way of not-thinking.
Or maybe ...
(End of Part 1)
The L Word: Another Peace Movement
THE L WORD: LIBERALISM IN CRISIS
THE PEACE MOVEMENT: FRANCE, 1930’S
Paul Berman, Terror and Liberlism:
... They did not wish to reduce Germany in all its Teutonic complexity to black-and-white terms of good and evil. The anti-war Socialists pointed out that Germany had been wronged by the Treaty of Versailles, at the conclusion of the First World War. The anti-war Socialists observed that the Germans living in Slavic countries to the East were sometimes cruelly treated by their neighbors, and that Germany in the 1930s had every right to complain about its neighbors, and that Germany’s people were, in fact, suffering, just as Hitler said. And, having analyzed the German scene in this manner, the anti-war Socialists concluded that Hitler and the Nazis, in railing against the Great Powers and the Treaty of Versailles, did make some legitimate arguments – even if Nazism came from the extreme right and was not at all to the Socialists’ taste.
The anti-war Socialists wanted to know: why shouldn’t the French government show a little flexibility in the face of Hitler’s demands? Why not recognize that some of Hitler’s points were well taken? Why not look for ways to conciliate the outraged German people and, in that way, to conciliate the Nazis? ...
... They felt that courage and radicalism allowed them to peer beneath the surface of events and identify the deeper factors at work in international relations – the truest danger facing France. This danger, in their judgment, did not come from Hitler and the Nazis, not principally.
The truest danger came from the warmongers and arms manufacturers of France itself, as well as from the other great powers – the people who stood to benefit in material ways from a new war. ...
Terror and Liberalism, pp. 124 - 125
|
THE PEACE MOVEMENT: FRANCE, 1930’S
Paul Berman, Terror and Liberlism:
... They did not wish to reduce Germany in all its Teutonic complexity to black-and-white terms of good and evil. The anti-war Socialists pointed out that Germany had been wronged by the Treaty of Versailles, at the conclusion of the First World War. The anti-war Socialists observed that the Germans living in Slavic countries to the East were sometimes cruelly treated by their neighbors, and that Germany in the 1930s had every right to complain about its neighbors, and that Germany’s people were, in fact, suffering, just as Hitler said. And, having analyzed the German scene in this manner, the anti-war Socialists concluded that Hitler and the Nazis, in railing against the Great Powers and the Treaty of Versailles, did make some legitimate arguments – even if Nazism came from the extreme right and was not at all to the Socialists’ taste.
The anti-war Socialists wanted to know: why shouldn’t the French government show a little flexibility in the face of Hitler’s demands? Why not recognize that some of Hitler’s points were well taken? Why not look for ways to conciliate the outraged German people and, in that way, to conciliate the Nazis? ...
... They felt that courage and radicalism allowed them to peer beneath the surface of events and identify the deeper factors at work in international relations – the truest danger facing France. This danger, in their judgment, did not come from Hitler and the Nazis, not principally.
The truest danger came from the warmongers and arms manufacturers of France itself, as well as from the other great powers – the people who stood to benefit in material ways from a new war. ...
Terror and Liberalism, pp. 124 - 125
Best of Blogdad: Iraqis Address the Peace Movement (Part 2)
In this post in Iraq the Model, Mohammed describes his reaction to the protest in London, where a statue of President Bush was pulled down in imitation of the April 9 event in Baghdad, where a statue of Saddam Hussein was toppled:
-What was I supposed to feel when I see a statue representing Mr. Bush being pulled to the ground in London?
I hesitated whether to write about it or not, but I found myself compelled to do so as I couldn't tolerate to keep all the frustration inside.
-I was shocked I didn't find the slightest similarity the protestors wanted to exhibit and it never occurred to me that I would see such a naïve and absurd action, and where? In London!.
-We here are waiting for all possible help from these people to offer us what broadens our horizon and helps us reach the bright side of life as they helped us in freeing our country from the tyranny, and scenes like these make me doubt the value of such help, I mean what were they trying to prove?
-The real, living and historical event that took place in Baghdad
on the 9th of April that announced not only the downfall of the ugliest dictatorship in modern history but also the beginning of a new era of freedom was a totally a genuine and spontaneous reaction that came right out of the hearts and souls of crowds that have been brutally restrained for decades, and trying to simulate this through a previously organized and timed action was something the least I could say about is pathetic and disgusting . ...
Read the whole post at the link.
|
-What was I supposed to feel when I see a statue representing Mr. Bush being pulled to the ground in London?
I hesitated whether to write about it or not, but I found myself compelled to do so as I couldn't tolerate to keep all the frustration inside.
-I was shocked I didn't find the slightest similarity the protestors wanted to exhibit and it never occurred to me that I would see such a naïve and absurd action, and where? In London!.
-We here are waiting for all possible help from these people to offer us what broadens our horizon and helps us reach the bright side of life as they helped us in freeing our country from the tyranny, and scenes like these make me doubt the value of such help, I mean what were they trying to prove?
-The real, living and historical event that took place in Baghdad
on the 9th of April that announced not only the downfall of the ugliest dictatorship in modern history but also the beginning of a new era of freedom was a totally a genuine and spontaneous reaction that came right out of the hearts and souls of crowds that have been brutally restrained for decades, and trying to simulate this through a previously organized and timed action was something the least I could say about is pathetic and disgusting . ...
Read the whole post at the link.
Best of Blogdad: Blood for Oil?
"No Blood for Oil!"
That was the popular slogan of the "peace" movement, as you'll recall. Here Omar responds to that notion:
... There had been a perspective that is widely spread among Arabs and the anti war, even some Iraqis, that America came to Iraq to steal the oil and other natural resources from Iraq (I don't know if anyone supports this idea in the USA) and I’ve got sick of seeing this ridiculous idea written on the walls in Baghdad or on signs held by the supposed peace activists or even being spoken in interviews on al-jazeera or other Arab media by those who pretend that they care for the interests of the Iraqi people.
I wonder how their brilliant, clear thinking got to that nonnegotiable conclusion!!?
Well I found that the answer is so simple, that even a blind man can see...heh.
I have read some statistics about the economy of the USA and I found that the (GDP) of America is something around (11,000 billion) dollars, while that of Iraq is about (18 billion) dollars (regarding the current rate of oil export), which means that the (GDP) of USA = 611 times the (GDP) of Iraq.
Another interesting result is that America can make that (18) billions in only 14 hours!.
Everyone knows that the American forces need about (4 billion) dollars/month for their supplies, operations and reconstruction work.
I find it so naive for someone to think that the USA is spending 4 billions a month to "steal" 1,5 billions.
The USA has already spent (or assigned) over 200 billion dollars, which requires the Americans to wait for over 10 years to get their money back.
What a great investment!!!
And that's only in the case that America is "stealing" all the oil or money of Iraq, while as a matter of fact, all the money that oil yields is spent to provide food, medications and of course to pay salaries to the Iraqis.The war was never for oil itself, the aims of the war were freeing the Iraqi people, destroying Saddam's WMD's, fighting international terrorism and the spread of freedom and democracy in the M.E.
Some Iraqis say that Iraq is a wealthy country and that America came here to steal our fortune, and I ask them what f***ing fortune? Saddam has driven Iraq bankrupt and even worse, Iraq is now drowning in debts.
Iraq is a (potentially rich) country, that's true. Iraq was once rich, but right now it's a poor country, and in order to make Iraq a rich country once again we need researches, experience, investments and years of hard work. This can not be done by the Iraqis alone, we need help, and we're getting that help.
Saddam wasted most of our fortune on his intelligence and security agencies and his plans to get WMD's and the rest was transferred to the secret accounts of his and his family.
However I find that there is one good side effect of the war that is related to the oil, oil is needed continuously all over the world, and the oil supplies should be maintained to every country, no crazy tyrant like Saddam should be controlling one of the largest reserves of oil in the world, imagine the mess if Saddam, Gaddafy and the mullahs of Iran decided to cease the production of oil, as some Arab countries did in 1973 when Saddam held the slogan (oil is a weapon in the battle).
Anyway I think that -even this side effect- was not in the interest of the USA alone.
Oil, like water; is essential to everyone, and no one should hold it off from the others.
|
That was the popular slogan of the "peace" movement, as you'll recall. Here Omar responds to that notion:
... There had been a perspective that is widely spread among Arabs and the anti war, even some Iraqis, that America came to Iraq to steal the oil and other natural resources from Iraq (I don't know if anyone supports this idea in the USA) and I’ve got sick of seeing this ridiculous idea written on the walls in Baghdad or on signs held by the supposed peace activists or even being spoken in interviews on al-jazeera or other Arab media by those who pretend that they care for the interests of the Iraqi people.
I wonder how their brilliant, clear thinking got to that nonnegotiable conclusion!!?
Well I found that the answer is so simple, that even a blind man can see...heh.
I have read some statistics about the economy of the USA and I found that the (GDP) of America is something around (11,000 billion) dollars, while that of Iraq is about (18 billion) dollars (regarding the current rate of oil export), which means that the (GDP) of USA = 611 times the (GDP) of Iraq.
Another interesting result is that America can make that (18) billions in only 14 hours!.
Everyone knows that the American forces need about (4 billion) dollars/month for their supplies, operations and reconstruction work.
I find it so naive for someone to think that the USA is spending 4 billions a month to "steal" 1,5 billions.
The USA has already spent (or assigned) over 200 billion dollars, which requires the Americans to wait for over 10 years to get their money back.
What a great investment!!!
And that's only in the case that America is "stealing" all the oil or money of Iraq, while as a matter of fact, all the money that oil yields is spent to provide food, medications and of course to pay salaries to the Iraqis.The war was never for oil itself, the aims of the war were freeing the Iraqi people, destroying Saddam's WMD's, fighting international terrorism and the spread of freedom and democracy in the M.E.
Some Iraqis say that Iraq is a wealthy country and that America came here to steal our fortune, and I ask them what f***ing fortune? Saddam has driven Iraq bankrupt and even worse, Iraq is now drowning in debts.
Iraq is a (potentially rich) country, that's true. Iraq was once rich, but right now it's a poor country, and in order to make Iraq a rich country once again we need researches, experience, investments and years of hard work. This can not be done by the Iraqis alone, we need help, and we're getting that help.
Saddam wasted most of our fortune on his intelligence and security agencies and his plans to get WMD's and the rest was transferred to the secret accounts of his and his family.
However I find that there is one good side effect of the war that is related to the oil, oil is needed continuously all over the world, and the oil supplies should be maintained to every country, no crazy tyrant like Saddam should be controlling one of the largest reserves of oil in the world, imagine the mess if Saddam, Gaddafy and the mullahs of Iran decided to cease the production of oil, as some Arab countries did in 1973 when Saddam held the slogan (oil is a weapon in the battle).
Anyway I think that -even this side effect- was not in the interest of the USA alone.
Oil, like water; is essential to everyone, and no one should hold it off from the others.
Morning Report: May 16, 2004
- Seeing Iraq in the economy? (Byron York) In Friday’s National Review Online, Byron York suggests that Americans’ perceptions of the war in Iraq may be influencing their responses to poll questions about the economy. Despite Bush’s low approval rating, however, the incumbent President still retains a slender lead over challenger Kerry, according to figures cited by York.
- Iranians clash with regime forces in Toos, Shahinshar. (SMCCDI) Demonstrators clashed with security forces in the northwestern city of Toos on Friday, after the forces attacked a peaceful protest demonstration, according to SMCCDI. The incident followed an official commemoration of Ferdowsi, the Iranian nationalist and author of the epic Shahnameh, in the poet’s hometown. Dissidents say the regime, which was previously hostile to Ferdowsi’s legacy, is now trying to co-opt the poet’s memory to its own advantage. On Friday evening, violence broke out in the industrial city of Shahinshar, located in Esfahan province in central Iran, after several women were arrested for alleged infractions of the Islamic dress code. In order to regain control of the city, security forces had to close off an entire neighborhoood – ironically, an area named after Ferdowsi.
|
- Iranians clash with regime forces in Toos, Shahinshar. (SMCCDI) Demonstrators clashed with security forces in the northwestern city of Toos on Friday, after the forces attacked a peaceful protest demonstration, according to SMCCDI. The incident followed an official commemoration of Ferdowsi, the Iranian nationalist and author of the epic Shahnameh, in the poet’s hometown. Dissidents say the regime, which was previously hostile to Ferdowsi’s legacy, is now trying to co-opt the poet’s memory to its own advantage. On Friday evening, violence broke out in the industrial city of Shahinshar, located in Esfahan province in central Iran, after several women were arrested for alleged infractions of the Islamic dress code. In order to regain control of the city, security forces had to close off an entire neighborhoood – ironically, an area named after Ferdowsi.
Saturday, May 15, 2004
The L Word
A few weeks ago, a friend asked me, How, if I considered myself a liberal, could I support the Bush Administration's Mideast policy?
I have to admit I was stumped for a moment. In fact, it's exactly BECAUSE I am a liberal that I support the Greater Mideast Initiative. And while I clearly disagree with President Bush on many things, I have revised my opinion of him for the better over the last two and a half years.
For me, being a liberal means first and foremost being open-minded, and putting principle ahead of partisan loyalty. And it means standing up for freedom and human rights, and standing against foreign dictators. A few years ago, a rich, Republican oil man from Texas would have seemed the unlikeliest of all allies in such a fight - but things are different now, and as liberals, accustomed to standing up for the poor and the downtrodden, we must learn to adjust to our successes as well as our defeats.
Regular readers of this blog - yes, both of you - will already be generally familiar with my outlook and my views on the major issues. But I'm realizing that it will probably be helpful for me to explicitly address the question of American liberalism today and its relationship to the freedom movement. So I will begin doing that on a regular basis.
|
I have to admit I was stumped for a moment. In fact, it's exactly BECAUSE I am a liberal that I support the Greater Mideast Initiative. And while I clearly disagree with President Bush on many things, I have revised my opinion of him for the better over the last two and a half years.
For me, being a liberal means first and foremost being open-minded, and putting principle ahead of partisan loyalty. And it means standing up for freedom and human rights, and standing against foreign dictators. A few years ago, a rich, Republican oil man from Texas would have seemed the unlikeliest of all allies in such a fight - but things are different now, and as liberals, accustomed to standing up for the poor and the downtrodden, we must learn to adjust to our successes as well as our defeats.
Regular readers of this blog - yes, both of you - will already be generally familiar with my outlook and my views on the major issues. But I'm realizing that it will probably be helpful for me to explicitly address the question of American liberalism today and its relationship to the freedom movement. So I will begin doing that on a regular basis.
The L Word: George Galloway
THE L WORD: LIBERALISM IN CRISIS
George Galloway
Johann Hari shreds George Galloway's new "autobiography", a thinly-veiled fountain of Ba'athist propaganda. The following extract, from the passage quoted by Pejman, very succinctly explains the whold mentality of the antiwar Left:
"Galloway has never before had to give a sustained account of his attitudes towards the Ba'athist regime in Iraq. To his credit, he opposed Saddam's tyranny in the 1980s when the Americans supported the dictator and his acts of genocide. But - like so much of the Left - when the Americans switched sides, so did he. Hatred of American power appears to be his primary motive, rather than any positive left-wing values of his own."
Elsewhere Hari compares Galloway to a "crack-smoking Stalin." Don't miss Johann Hari, or Pejman.
|
George Galloway
Johann Hari shreds George Galloway's new "autobiography", a thinly-veiled fountain of Ba'athist propaganda. The following extract, from the passage quoted by Pejman, very succinctly explains the whold mentality of the antiwar Left:
"Galloway has never before had to give a sustained account of his attitudes towards the Ba'athist regime in Iraq. To his credit, he opposed Saddam's tyranny in the 1980s when the Americans supported the dictator and his acts of genocide. But - like so much of the Left - when the Americans switched sides, so did he. Hatred of American power appears to be his primary motive, rather than any positive left-wing values of his own."
Elsewhere Hari compares Galloway to a "crack-smoking Stalin." Don't miss Johann Hari, or Pejman.
Friday, May 14, 2004
Morning Report: May 14, 2004
Morning Report will be on liberty tomorrow (Saturday), and returning to duty on Sunday.
- Freedom activists issue petition. (SMCCDI) Iranian activists issued a petition calling for regime change in the Islamic Republic.
- Bush imposes Syria sanctions. (various) Belmont Club notes the “extraordinarily accusatory” tone of the Executive Order, saying that it indicates “the US is not willing to confront Damascus militarily – yet.” Oubai at FAF calls it “not an end in itself, but a means-- a first step in bringing about the end of the Syrian Baath Regime” and counsels Assad to start thinking about a long vacation in France. The complete text may be found here.
|
- Freedom activists issue petition. (SMCCDI) Iranian activists issued a petition calling for regime change in the Islamic Republic.
- Bush imposes Syria sanctions. (various) Belmont Club notes the “extraordinarily accusatory” tone of the Executive Order, saying that it indicates “the US is not willing to confront Damascus militarily – yet.” Oubai at FAF calls it “not an end in itself, but a means-- a first step in bringing about the end of the Syrian Baath Regime” and counsels Assad to start thinking about a long vacation in France. The complete text may be found here.
Thursday, May 13, 2004
Iran Regime Change Petition
|Best of Blogdad: Yassin Killing
When the Israelis dispatched Sheikh Yassin last March, opinion was divided among the Iraqi bloggers, as it was in the West. I am posting excerpts here.
Alaa:
I am beside myself with rage. Perhaps I should not post today and wait a bit until I can think in a more dispassionate way. But I cannot wait really. Mr. Sharon: Usama Bin Laden and his friends are delighted and send you their best regards. This stupid and senseless killing of an old invalid is a Godsend to all the terrorists in the region and has been timed at exactly the right moment. It is a stab in the back aimed at the U.S. and allied efforts and a direct attack on all their friends in the region. ...
Zeyad:
We woke up early in the morning yesterday to the shocking news of the assasination of Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. One of the doctors at the residence was in hysterics about it and the noise woke me up. The first thought that came to my mind was good riddance, but then the gravity of the whole thing slowly creeped upon me. While I was distastefully brushing my teeth, I heard the doctor roaring into the bedroom ernestly trying to wake up my colleague, the Christian dentist, "WAAAAAKE UUUUUUPPP! They killed the Pope!!". My friend sprang out from
bed and rushed over to the tv, after which I heard him swearing at the doctor who was rolling with laughter at the situation.
Our cook had the most interesting reaction. "How many young men did this @#%$ send to death by brainwashing and fooling them into carrying out suicide attacks? How many innocent people had he killed?" he shouted to the doctor, "And how many thousands of dollars did he get in his Swiss bank accounts by pimping on the Palestinian cause?". "If he was truly such a hero and a believer in Jihad how come he didn't rig his wheelchair with explosives and blow himself up at some Israeli checkpoint? I say f* him". We advised the cook to stay out of politics, at least for the moment, and stick to his task of scrambling eggs for us. ...
AYS:
I think what Israel did is wrong, wrong time, wrong way, this isn’t a way to perish the terrorists, Israel will make the region unstable in such operations.. I’m sure Hamas won’t keep silent.. Also, this operation will change the Iraqi people’ feelings, yes .. the people here will link between Israel and USA, I don’t know why always they consider USA is in charge of that ! you know, this is a great chance for some clerics to incite!
Poor USA, Israel kills a leader and the Palestinians carry banners saying “ Death to America” ! huh.. silly people..
Ali:
I couldn’t mourn you and I couldn’t feel sorry for you. You’re an old crippled man, you’re an Arab like me, a ‘Muslim’ like me, and you fought most of your life for what you believed in. You were imprisoned for a long time and you were murdered; yet I couldn’t mourn you!
You know why? I’ll tell you why:
I’ve always took the side of the weak, poor and oppressed people if for no other reason, then simply because I’ve lived most of my life like them and I can’t argue that the Palestinian people have rights that are still missing. Some people will say that it’s because of their doing, but I don’t want to get into the huge complications of this conflict. I just want to point why and when did I loose sympathy with people like Ahmad Yassin.
Whatever we think about this conflict and whatever side we take, none of us can deny that there is a problem and it’s far from easy to determine how to solve it and who has the right in this or that. People have different opinions that spread through a spectrum where you can find millions who consider a man like Scheckh Yassin a saint and you can find millions who consider him a Satan as well as a small portion with less extreme opinions.
Palestinians had chosen different ways of pursuing what they considered their legitimate rights before the birth of Israel. Some of them chose to fight, others chose political struggle and the negotiation table and some joined the new state and pursued their rights taking advantage of the democratic nature of Israel and made it as high as can be expected, still supporting the rights of their people as well as the rights of their ‘new’ country.
I don’t want to go into the details of this intricate conflict, but I want to say that those- who chose to fight by convincing people (mostly teenagers and young men) in suicide, in the hope that during this they can murder the largest possible number of civilians; men, women elderly and children- deserve no mourning and no sympathy.
These people (Yassin alike) argue that civilians-usually Israeli and Americans- are partners in what they consider crimes against their people (Arab or Muslims), because they elected their governments and they support their actions. I say; I’ll go with you this far and suppose that you are victims to Israel and America and thus you have the right to fight and kill the American and Israeli men and women. But, what about their CHILDREN?? What about YOUR children who you send to death while they kill Israeli children? What about that 15 year old girl you convinced her of committing suicide in order to kill other people, including children?
You claim that all children are born Muslims and that their parents raise them to be Christians or Jews. If we follow your rules and believe your words, you’ll be killing Muslim children!! How can you explain that to yourself before trying to explain it to the others? I’ve asked this question to all those who support the suicidal attacks and NONE could have an answer. The best they could come up with is that these suicidal bombers do not intend to kill children and that it happens accidentally!! Don’t they have eyes that can recognize a child? And why do they pick buses when they know that it’s very likely that some children will be there?
You have not only disgraced yourselves and betrayed Gods words; you have hurt your people, the Muslims, more than anyone else. You made every Muslim a suspect in the eyes of the world and I will never feel sorry for you. ...
|
Alaa:
I am beside myself with rage. Perhaps I should not post today and wait a bit until I can think in a more dispassionate way. But I cannot wait really. Mr. Sharon: Usama Bin Laden and his friends are delighted and send you their best regards. This stupid and senseless killing of an old invalid is a Godsend to all the terrorists in the region and has been timed at exactly the right moment. It is a stab in the back aimed at the U.S. and allied efforts and a direct attack on all their friends in the region. ...
Zeyad:
We woke up early in the morning yesterday to the shocking news of the assasination of Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. One of the doctors at the residence was in hysterics about it and the noise woke me up. The first thought that came to my mind was good riddance, but then the gravity of the whole thing slowly creeped upon me. While I was distastefully brushing my teeth, I heard the doctor roaring into the bedroom ernestly trying to wake up my colleague, the Christian dentist, "WAAAAAKE UUUUUUPPP! They killed the Pope!!". My friend sprang out from
bed and rushed over to the tv, after which I heard him swearing at the doctor who was rolling with laughter at the situation.
Our cook had the most interesting reaction. "How many young men did this @#%$ send to death by brainwashing and fooling them into carrying out suicide attacks? How many innocent people had he killed?" he shouted to the doctor, "And how many thousands of dollars did he get in his Swiss bank accounts by pimping on the Palestinian cause?". "If he was truly such a hero and a believer in Jihad how come he didn't rig his wheelchair with explosives and blow himself up at some Israeli checkpoint? I say f* him". We advised the cook to stay out of politics, at least for the moment, and stick to his task of scrambling eggs for us. ...
AYS:
I think what Israel did is wrong, wrong time, wrong way, this isn’t a way to perish the terrorists, Israel will make the region unstable in such operations.. I’m sure Hamas won’t keep silent.. Also, this operation will change the Iraqi people’ feelings, yes .. the people here will link between Israel and USA, I don’t know why always they consider USA is in charge of that ! you know, this is a great chance for some clerics to incite!
Poor USA, Israel kills a leader and the Palestinians carry banners saying “ Death to America” ! huh.. silly people..
Ali:
I couldn’t mourn you and I couldn’t feel sorry for you. You’re an old crippled man, you’re an Arab like me, a ‘Muslim’ like me, and you fought most of your life for what you believed in. You were imprisoned for a long time and you were murdered; yet I couldn’t mourn you!
You know why? I’ll tell you why:
I’ve always took the side of the weak, poor and oppressed people if for no other reason, then simply because I’ve lived most of my life like them and I can’t argue that the Palestinian people have rights that are still missing. Some people will say that it’s because of their doing, but I don’t want to get into the huge complications of this conflict. I just want to point why and when did I loose sympathy with people like Ahmad Yassin.
Whatever we think about this conflict and whatever side we take, none of us can deny that there is a problem and it’s far from easy to determine how to solve it and who has the right in this or that. People have different opinions that spread through a spectrum where you can find millions who consider a man like Scheckh Yassin a saint and you can find millions who consider him a Satan as well as a small portion with less extreme opinions.
Palestinians had chosen different ways of pursuing what they considered their legitimate rights before the birth of Israel. Some of them chose to fight, others chose political struggle and the negotiation table and some joined the new state and pursued their rights taking advantage of the democratic nature of Israel and made it as high as can be expected, still supporting the rights of their people as well as the rights of their ‘new’ country.
I don’t want to go into the details of this intricate conflict, but I want to say that those- who chose to fight by convincing people (mostly teenagers and young men) in suicide, in the hope that during this they can murder the largest possible number of civilians; men, women elderly and children- deserve no mourning and no sympathy.
These people (Yassin alike) argue that civilians-usually Israeli and Americans- are partners in what they consider crimes against their people (Arab or Muslims), because they elected their governments and they support their actions. I say; I’ll go with you this far and suppose that you are victims to Israel and America and thus you have the right to fight and kill the American and Israeli men and women. But, what about their CHILDREN?? What about YOUR children who you send to death while they kill Israeli children? What about that 15 year old girl you convinced her of committing suicide in order to kill other people, including children?
You claim that all children are born Muslims and that their parents raise them to be Christians or Jews. If we follow your rules and believe your words, you’ll be killing Muslim children!! How can you explain that to yourself before trying to explain it to the others? I’ve asked this question to all those who support the suicidal attacks and NONE could have an answer. The best they could come up with is that these suicidal bombers do not intend to kill children and that it happens accidentally!! Don’t they have eyes that can recognize a child? And why do they pick buses when they know that it’s very likely that some children will be there?
You have not only disgraced yourselves and betrayed Gods words; you have hurt your people, the Muslims, more than anyone else. You made every Muslim a suspect in the eyes of the world and I will never feel sorry for you. ...
True Security Begins with Regime Change in Iran
PETITION: TRUE SECURITY BEGINS WITH REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN
As House Resolution 398 has rightly recognized, the illegitimate government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has engaged, and continues to engage, in efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. Such weapons would pose an immediate threat not only to Iran’s neigbors, but ultimately to the entire world.
The cruelty of the IRI regime is well known and abundantly documented. The regime has been implicated in assassinations throughout the Middle East, Europe, and the United States; the murder of more than 100,000 Iranians; continuing policies of rape, torture, and arbitrary imprisonment as political tools; and the kidnapping of thousands of women and girls for sale into prostitution and slavery.
According to the Department of State report released by the Department of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor on February 25, 2004: “The Government's poor human rights record worsened, and it continued to commit numerous, serious abuses. The right of citizens to change their government was restricted significantly. Continuing serious abuses included: summary executions; disappearances; torture and other degrading treatment, reportedly including severe punishments such as beheading and flogging; poor prison conditions; arbitrary arrest and detention; lack of habeas corpus or access to counsel and prolonged and incommunicado detention. Citizens often did not receive due process or fair trials. The Government infringed on citizens' privacy rights, and restricted freedom of speech, press, assembly, association and religion.” These and other abuses clearly indicate that the regime constitutes a grave threat to the people of Iran and to free people everywhere.
It has come to our attention that Israel and/or the United States may be contemplating a pre-emptive military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. If the United States follows a policy based exclusively on the nuclear issue, however, the results will be catastrophic both for the Iranian people and, ultimately, for the Middle East and the world. Merely striking at Iranian nuclear facilities would at best delay the regime’s nuclear program, driving it deeper underground; would certainly provoke even harsher measures against the Iranian people; and would likely lure the West into a false sense of security with the mullahs of the IRI regime plotting their ultimate retribution against America, Israel, and all others who have stood in their way.
The Islamist regime continues to actively undermine American efforts to rebuild Afghanistan and Iraq. Regime-backed agents and mercenaries are killing American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines every week. To wait until Iraq and Afghanistan are “secure” before confronting the Iranian mullahs is folly; rather, the United States must take the battle to the enemy in Tehran.
The vast majority of freedom-loving Iranian people support the right of Israel and all of Iran’s Middle Eastern neighbors, as well as the United States, to live in peace and security. Therefore, it is in our common interest that:
1. President Bush must support clear and open policy calling for regime change in Iran.
2. The Administration must abandon its policy of “Afghanistan yesterday, Iraq today, Iran maybe tomorrow”, and confront the threat from the IRI regime immediately.
3. President Bush must deliver an ultimatum to the IRI’s primary hidden supporters (Britain) and secondary supporters (France, Germany, EU, Japan, Canada, Russia, and China) to stop giving economic assistance, intelligence assistance, or other assistance to the regime. The EU, in particular, should not use resources stolen from the Iranian people to finance its own failed welfare state.
4. The United States must deliver an unequivocal ultimatum to the Iranian regime to step down peacefully and immediately, and transfer power to a team of Iranian-American leaders; this team would set up a referendum under US and international supervision with military presence of US, Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands in Iran as the peacekeeper. If the mullahs do not agree to step down peacefully, then the US should provide all necessary financial and military support for freedom-loving Iranian opposition both inside and outside Iran to remove the regime in a short period of time.
The Bush Doctrine advocates America’s active role in supporting freedom, democracy, and human rights throughout the world. We call on the Government to act in accord with this wise and noble policy, and help the Iranian people achieve their dream of a free and democratic Iran.
This is the preliminary text of a petition to be circulated by Iranian freedom activist groups. Watch this space for further details.
|
As House Resolution 398 has rightly recognized, the illegitimate government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has engaged, and continues to engage, in efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. Such weapons would pose an immediate threat not only to Iran’s neigbors, but ultimately to the entire world.
The cruelty of the IRI regime is well known and abundantly documented. The regime has been implicated in assassinations throughout the Middle East, Europe, and the United States; the murder of more than 100,000 Iranians; continuing policies of rape, torture, and arbitrary imprisonment as political tools; and the kidnapping of thousands of women and girls for sale into prostitution and slavery.
According to the Department of State report released by the Department of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor on February 25, 2004: “The Government's poor human rights record worsened, and it continued to commit numerous, serious abuses. The right of citizens to change their government was restricted significantly. Continuing serious abuses included: summary executions; disappearances; torture and other degrading treatment, reportedly including severe punishments such as beheading and flogging; poor prison conditions; arbitrary arrest and detention; lack of habeas corpus or access to counsel and prolonged and incommunicado detention. Citizens often did not receive due process or fair trials. The Government infringed on citizens' privacy rights, and restricted freedom of speech, press, assembly, association and religion.” These and other abuses clearly indicate that the regime constitutes a grave threat to the people of Iran and to free people everywhere.
It has come to our attention that Israel and/or the United States may be contemplating a pre-emptive military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. If the United States follows a policy based exclusively on the nuclear issue, however, the results will be catastrophic both for the Iranian people and, ultimately, for the Middle East and the world. Merely striking at Iranian nuclear facilities would at best delay the regime’s nuclear program, driving it deeper underground; would certainly provoke even harsher measures against the Iranian people; and would likely lure the West into a false sense of security with the mullahs of the IRI regime plotting their ultimate retribution against America, Israel, and all others who have stood in their way.
The Islamist regime continues to actively undermine American efforts to rebuild Afghanistan and Iraq. Regime-backed agents and mercenaries are killing American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines every week. To wait until Iraq and Afghanistan are “secure” before confronting the Iranian mullahs is folly; rather, the United States must take the battle to the enemy in Tehran.
The vast majority of freedom-loving Iranian people support the right of Israel and all of Iran’s Middle Eastern neighbors, as well as the United States, to live in peace and security. Therefore, it is in our common interest that:
1. President Bush must support clear and open policy calling for regime change in Iran.
2. The Administration must abandon its policy of “Afghanistan yesterday, Iraq today, Iran maybe tomorrow”, and confront the threat from the IRI regime immediately.
3. President Bush must deliver an ultimatum to the IRI’s primary hidden supporters (Britain) and secondary supporters (France, Germany, EU, Japan, Canada, Russia, and China) to stop giving economic assistance, intelligence assistance, or other assistance to the regime. The EU, in particular, should not use resources stolen from the Iranian people to finance its own failed welfare state.
4. The United States must deliver an unequivocal ultimatum to the Iranian regime to step down peacefully and immediately, and transfer power to a team of Iranian-American leaders; this team would set up a referendum under US and international supervision with military presence of US, Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands in Iran as the peacekeeper. If the mullahs do not agree to step down peacefully, then the US should provide all necessary financial and military support for freedom-loving Iranian opposition both inside and outside Iran to remove the regime in a short period of time.
The Bush Doctrine advocates America’s active role in supporting freedom, democracy, and human rights throughout the world. We call on the Government to act in accord with this wise and noble policy, and help the Iranian people achieve their dream of a free and democratic Iran.
This is the preliminary text of a petition to be circulated by Iranian freedom activist groups. Watch this space for further details.
Winning in Iraq
While many young Americans are comfortably sitting in college or grad school, a few have taken it upon themselves to do something that might actually make the world a better place. They are the volunteers who are working to aid in the reconstruction of Iraq. Some of these were highlighted in National Review Online:
“I can't sleep. I lie awake in my luxurious trailer and my mind is racing through possible scenarios. A few days ago there was a stretch where we were attacked several days in a row at 8am...like clockwork. Thankfully they have subsided since but for that stretch each morning my 'alarm clock' was a loud BOOM and a shaking trailer."
So begins an April 16 diary entry of 25-year-old Brendan Lund. Brendan and his cousin, Craig, are in Baghdad, working with the Iraqi Ministry of Finance in the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). They're just two of the scores of young Americans who have volunteered since March 2003 to live in a war zone, sleep in bare-minimum trailers, work 16-hour days (or more), and wake up to rocket attacks — all in the name of building democracy in Iraq.
"Personally I looked at it as the right thing to do," Brendan says. "How can people my age who have this choice not want to go out and do this?" ...
Working long hours under dangerous conditions, these young people (most of them in their 20s) find fulfillment in helping the people of Iraq to become self-sufficient, prosperous, and free. With so many youths apathetic, materialistic, and cynical, it's good to know that idealism is still alive. Don't wait for the media to tell you about this; go read Rachel Zabarkes Friedman's article here.
|
“I can't sleep. I lie awake in my luxurious trailer and my mind is racing through possible scenarios. A few days ago there was a stretch where we were attacked several days in a row at 8am...like clockwork. Thankfully they have subsided since but for that stretch each morning my 'alarm clock' was a loud BOOM and a shaking trailer."
So begins an April 16 diary entry of 25-year-old Brendan Lund. Brendan and his cousin, Craig, are in Baghdad, working with the Iraqi Ministry of Finance in the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA). They're just two of the scores of young Americans who have volunteered since March 2003 to live in a war zone, sleep in bare-minimum trailers, work 16-hour days (or more), and wake up to rocket attacks — all in the name of building democracy in Iraq.
"Personally I looked at it as the right thing to do," Brendan says. "How can people my age who have this choice not want to go out and do this?" ...
Working long hours under dangerous conditions, these young people (most of them in their 20s) find fulfillment in helping the people of Iraq to become self-sufficient, prosperous, and free. With so many youths apathetic, materialistic, and cynical, it's good to know that idealism is still alive. Don't wait for the media to tell you about this; go read Rachel Zabarkes Friedman's article here.
An Infinite Supply of Arab Murderers?
This excerpt from today's The Corner caught my eye. It says what I've been trying to find the words to say in response to American leftists who worry that "killing terrorists will just breed more terrorists":
... But I keep thinking of a point made by Bret Stephens, the editor of the Jerusalem Post, when asked why Israel keeps killing members of Hamas when it's so "counter-productive." He said something to the effect of (paraphrasing from memory):
"I think it's an odd sort of racism which assumes that Arabs are like cockroaches or insects and that they have no regard for their own lives and that we can kill terrorists forever and it will do no good because there's an infinite supply of Arab murderers." He went on to say something like "We don't believe all Palestinians are interchangeably animals who want to murder women and children." ...
This from the incomparable Jonah Goldberg. And this is exactly what I've been trying to say, that it is the leftists and the peaceniks who dehumanize Arabs and Mideasterners most of all, through the "soft bigotry of low expectations".
Read Jonah's full post here.
|
... But I keep thinking of a point made by Bret Stephens, the editor of the Jerusalem Post, when asked why Israel keeps killing members of Hamas when it's so "counter-productive." He said something to the effect of (paraphrasing from memory):
"I think it's an odd sort of racism which assumes that Arabs are like cockroaches or insects and that they have no regard for their own lives and that we can kill terrorists forever and it will do no good because there's an infinite supply of Arab murderers." He went on to say something like "We don't believe all Palestinians are interchangeably animals who want to murder women and children." ...
This from the incomparable Jonah Goldberg. And this is exactly what I've been trying to say, that it is the leftists and the peaceniks who dehumanize Arabs and Mideasterners most of all, through the "soft bigotry of low expectations".
Read Jonah's full post here.
Hans Blix
is apparently trying to make himself useful.
|
Iranian-Americans Boycott Ebadi's Speech
When Iranian Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi spoke in Washington, DC, Iranian-Americans stayed away in droves, according to SMCCDI News Service.
Once a favorite of the Iranian freedom movement, Ebadi shocked activists by declaring her allegiance to the so-called "moderate" faction in the Iranian regime.
Read the news report at this link.
|
Once a favorite of the Iranian freedom movement, Ebadi shocked activists by declaring her allegiance to the so-called "moderate" faction in the Iranian regime.
Read the news report at this link.
Morning Report: May 13, 2004
- Two-way influence. (Taheri) Reflecting on the Abu Ghraib scandal and on historical cases where opposing armies have influenced one another’s tactics, Amir Taheri explains that “it is impossible to wrestle with an adversary and not have one’s sweat mixed with his.” He concludes that “... the uniqe opportunity to stabilise and rebuild Iraq as a democratic state must not be wasted. Let us have all the Abu Ghraib trials we need. But let us not forget June 30, the date for transfer of power to an interim Iraqi government, and January 2005, the date for the first free elections in that country’s history.”
- Dark future, vicious cycle. (Iraq the Model) In a wry post on Iraq’s “dark future,” Ali warns of “the dangers of the vicious cycle of (prosperity-stability-more prosperity-more stability).” His cousin Ibrahim is a case study.
|
- Dark future, vicious cycle. (Iraq the Model) In a wry post on Iraq’s “dark future,” Ali warns of “the dangers of the vicious cycle of (prosperity-stability-more prosperity-more stability).” His cousin Ibrahim is a case study.
Wednesday, May 12, 2004
Quote of the Day
The chief film censor in Iran, up until 1994, was blind. Well, nearly blind. Before that, he was the censor for theater. One of my playwright friends once described how he would sit in the theater wearing thick glasses that seemed to hide more than they revealed. An assistant who sat by him would explain the action onstage, and he would dictate the parts that needed to be cut.
After 1994, this censor became the head of the new television channel. There, he perfected his methods and demanded that the scriptwriters give him their scripts on audiotape; they were forbidden to make them attractive or dramatize them in any way. He then made his judgments about the scripts based on the tapes. More interesting, however, is the fact that his successor, who was not blind -- not physically, that is -- nonetheless followed the same system.
Azar Nafisi, Reading Lolita in Tehran
|
After 1994, this censor became the head of the new television channel. There, he perfected his methods and demanded that the scriptwriters give him their scripts on audiotape; they were forbidden to make them attractive or dramatize them in any way. He then made his judgments about the scripts based on the tapes. More interesting, however, is the fact that his successor, who was not blind -- not physically, that is -- nonetheless followed the same system.
Azar Nafisi, Reading Lolita in Tehran
The Iraqi Holocaust: Uday vs. Women
from The Mesopotamian:
You might have heard that an assassination attempt against Uday had taken place in 1996, which left him with injuries that caused impotency. This made him even more cruel and sadistic than his usual self. It has been revealed after the fall of the regime that he shot the doctor who broke the news to him (c.f. interview with one of the close bodyguards of Uday at Al Arabia last year). This added one more complex to his extensive repertoire of psychological problems. He started to hate anything to do with other people having any kind of sexual pleasure.
Well, that horrible day we learnt that the night before the Fedayeen [under Uday's command] had attacked scores of houses and dragged women and young girls to streets and beheaded many with swords leaving the heads at the doorsteps of the victims houses. Some of these heads were left in place for more than twenty-four hours. The atrocities lasted for several weeks.
|
You might have heard that an assassination attempt against Uday had taken place in 1996, which left him with injuries that caused impotency. This made him even more cruel and sadistic than his usual self. It has been revealed after the fall of the regime that he shot the doctor who broke the news to him (c.f. interview with one of the close bodyguards of Uday at Al Arabia last year). This added one more complex to his extensive repertoire of psychological problems. He started to hate anything to do with other people having any kind of sexual pleasure.
Well, that horrible day we learnt that the night before the Fedayeen [under Uday's command] had attacked scores of houses and dragged women and young girls to streets and beheaded many with swords leaving the heads at the doorsteps of the victims houses. Some of these heads were left in place for more than twenty-four hours. The atrocities lasted for several weeks.
Self and Other
Who are we?
Often we seem to find ourselves defined by what we are not – that is, the people and things around us. For Westerners, these “things” include a certain level of material well-being (albeit higher for some than for others) and certain basic assumptions about the society we live in. For people in other parts of the world, the standard of living and the assumptions about life may be different.
But who we are, as people, as individuals – that is not defined by anyone or anything except ourselves.
Some Westerners have a need for there to be a mythic Other. It’s not so important who this Other is, in fact its’s better if we don’t get to know him/her too well. What matters is the role this figure plays. Often it’s that of the Noble Savage: wild, untamed, everything we imagine that we are not, and cannot be, but wish to be. And don’t the Arabs fit this picture perfectly? They live in tents, they ride camels, they have a fiery temper, they are exotic, swarthy, and Semitic ... and, oh yes, they’re not Jews! That’s the best part. (You know the old saying: An Arab when he’s dirty is picturesque; a Jew when he’s dirty is a dirty Jew.)
Who would want to spoil this rustic scene? Mention freedom, human rights, democracy ... oh, shock and horror! You want to make the Arabs just like Americans?! You want to turn the Middle East into a world of shopping malls? You have to respect their culture! Don’t you see? Those people are HAPPY living like that.
This argument is advanced not only by twenty-something leftists who can imagine no greater horror than the appearance of a Starbucks in their trendy neighborhoods; no, you can also hear this from respectable “intellectuals” who write erudite essays on the subject. Who is the Other? Well, the Other could be almost anyone you want.
But let’s take a look at who the Other is not. For liberal academicians, the Other is never, EVER, conservative Americans. That’s a given. Because once you designate someone as Other, you have an obligation to dialog with them. So those Republicans and neocons and Libertarians and middle-of-the-roaders become subsumed in the “us” – that is, the guilt-ridden “we” who are responsible for all the trouble in the world. The direct object of the anguished cry, “Why do they hate us?” (You didn’t really think these intellectuals were talking about themselves, now, did you?)
Neither does the Other include dissidents and freedom activists whose ethnicity might prove inconvenient – that is, who threaten the image of the picturesque Arab, for example. Iraqis are most emphatically not Other. If they were, then “we” might have to talk to them, and perhaps even listen to them. We might find out that they are not that different from “us”: they want to be able to afford medicine to save their sick children; they want to express their thoughts without fear of going to prison; and they do not particularly care for being fed feet-first into shredders.
Those who opposed the liberation of Iraq find all this terribly inconvenient, so it’s not too surprising that the anti-war Left are not flocking to donate to humanitarian relief organizations like Spirit of America. (One “intellectual” rabbi actually banned Spirit of America literature from his synagogue. But I digress.)
No, I don’t care to be defined by my environment, nor by intellectuals who want to do my thinking for me. I don’t mind acknowledging my commonality with Arabs, Iranians, the Turks in whose country I lived for two years, or my American neighbors in all their splendid diversity. I see myself as an individual human being, with a cultural heritage I’m proud of, and the ability to choose my own future. And I choose to work with other human beings who, like myself, choose freedom and a better world.
|
Often we seem to find ourselves defined by what we are not – that is, the people and things around us. For Westerners, these “things” include a certain level of material well-being (albeit higher for some than for others) and certain basic assumptions about the society we live in. For people in other parts of the world, the standard of living and the assumptions about life may be different.
But who we are, as people, as individuals – that is not defined by anyone or anything except ourselves.
Some Westerners have a need for there to be a mythic Other. It’s not so important who this Other is, in fact its’s better if we don’t get to know him/her too well. What matters is the role this figure plays. Often it’s that of the Noble Savage: wild, untamed, everything we imagine that we are not, and cannot be, but wish to be. And don’t the Arabs fit this picture perfectly? They live in tents, they ride camels, they have a fiery temper, they are exotic, swarthy, and Semitic ... and, oh yes, they’re not Jews! That’s the best part. (You know the old saying: An Arab when he’s dirty is picturesque; a Jew when he’s dirty is a dirty Jew.)
Who would want to spoil this rustic scene? Mention freedom, human rights, democracy ... oh, shock and horror! You want to make the Arabs just like Americans?! You want to turn the Middle East into a world of shopping malls? You have to respect their culture! Don’t you see? Those people are HAPPY living like that.
This argument is advanced not only by twenty-something leftists who can imagine no greater horror than the appearance of a Starbucks in their trendy neighborhoods; no, you can also hear this from respectable “intellectuals” who write erudite essays on the subject. Who is the Other? Well, the Other could be almost anyone you want.
But let’s take a look at who the Other is not. For liberal academicians, the Other is never, EVER, conservative Americans. That’s a given. Because once you designate someone as Other, you have an obligation to dialog with them. So those Republicans and neocons and Libertarians and middle-of-the-roaders become subsumed in the “us” – that is, the guilt-ridden “we” who are responsible for all the trouble in the world. The direct object of the anguished cry, “Why do they hate us?” (You didn’t really think these intellectuals were talking about themselves, now, did you?)
Neither does the Other include dissidents and freedom activists whose ethnicity might prove inconvenient – that is, who threaten the image of the picturesque Arab, for example. Iraqis are most emphatically not Other. If they were, then “we” might have to talk to them, and perhaps even listen to them. We might find out that they are not that different from “us”: they want to be able to afford medicine to save their sick children; they want to express their thoughts without fear of going to prison; and they do not particularly care for being fed feet-first into shredders.
Those who opposed the liberation of Iraq find all this terribly inconvenient, so it’s not too surprising that the anti-war Left are not flocking to donate to humanitarian relief organizations like Spirit of America. (One “intellectual” rabbi actually banned Spirit of America literature from his synagogue. But I digress.)
No, I don’t care to be defined by my environment, nor by intellectuals who want to do my thinking for me. I don’t mind acknowledging my commonality with Arabs, Iranians, the Turks in whose country I lived for two years, or my American neighbors in all their splendid diversity. I see myself as an individual human being, with a cultural heritage I’m proud of, and the ability to choose my own future. And I choose to work with other human beings who, like myself, choose freedom and a better world.
O Grand Vizier ...
|Security for Israel, Freedom for Iran
As noted here yesterday, there are persistent rumors that Israel and/or the United States may be contemplating a pre-emptive airstrike against the regime's nuclear sites in Iran.
Iranian freedom activists support Israel's right to security, but caution that any action taken against the regime in Tehran must come as part of a full-scale attack on the IRI mullahs in order to effect regime change.
For the Iranian people, a "pinpoint" strike that leaves the apparatus of oppression intact provides no relief or comfort. Such a move would only provide the regime with a pretext for further draconian measures against the Iranian populace.
For the West, it makes no strategic sense simply to "wound the beast." Merely attacking the IRI's nuclear facilities would treat the symptom but not the disease. We cannot afford to continue a failed policy of half-measures and stop-gap solutions.
Please watch this space for an official declaration from Iranian dissident organizations.
|
Iranian freedom activists support Israel's right to security, but caution that any action taken against the regime in Tehran must come as part of a full-scale attack on the IRI mullahs in order to effect regime change.
For the Iranian people, a "pinpoint" strike that leaves the apparatus of oppression intact provides no relief or comfort. Such a move would only provide the regime with a pretext for further draconian measures against the Iranian populace.
For the West, it makes no strategic sense simply to "wound the beast." Merely attacking the IRI's nuclear facilities would treat the symptom but not the disease. We cannot afford to continue a failed policy of half-measures and stop-gap solutions.
Please watch this space for an official declaration from Iranian dissident organizations.
Nick Berg: Invitation to a Beheading
Nick Berg, a 26-year-old American civilian, was decapitated on camera, apparently by none other than Zarqawi. This was done as revenge for the Abu Gharib scandal.
Zarqawi’s indignation is understandable. For more than a week, al-Qaeda was upstaged by the spectacle of Americans crying out for justice against a very amateurish attempt at prisoner abuse. Disgusting. Let Zarqawi, an acknowledged expert in the systematic destruction of human beings, show us how it’s really done.
|
Zarqawi’s indignation is understandable. For more than a week, al-Qaeda was upstaged by the spectacle of Americans crying out for justice against a very amateurish attempt at prisoner abuse. Disgusting. Let Zarqawi, an acknowledged expert in the systematic destruction of human beings, show us how it’s really done.
Morning Report: May 12, 2004
- Stand firm. (Safire) Morning Report is pleased to present a two-for-one special on William Safire today. In Monday’s column, recalling Secretary Rumsfeld’s decision to re-examine the White House order for “military tribunals” for suspected terrorists – resulting in “basic protections” for those accused – Safire argued that Rumsfeld should not resign in the wake of the current scandal. Today, he reminds “those of us who believe in the nobility of exporting freedom” (and yes, dear reader, that includes your present blogger) that “we need not let our dismay ... overwhelm the morally sound purpose of our antiterror campaign.”
- American Nick Berg beheaded on film. (Various) The gruesome decapitation of 26-year-old American civilian Nick Berg reached the airwaves on Tuesday. You don’t need a link from me to help you find this stuff.
- Jane on the rule of law. (Armies of Liberation) Jane says “the path to a more perfect union runs throught Abu Ghraib.” An exceptionally fine article.
|
- American Nick Berg beheaded on film. (Various) The gruesome decapitation of 26-year-old American civilian Nick Berg reached the airwaves on Tuesday. You don’t need a link from me to help you find this stuff.
- Jane on the rule of law. (Armies of Liberation) Jane says “the path to a more perfect union runs throught Abu Ghraib.” An exceptionally fine article.
Tuesday, May 11, 2004
The Iraqi Holocaust: Mass Graves
Please take a few minutes to look at some of the 56 pages of photographs of Iraqi Mass Graves.
|
True Kindness
What is Zaka?
|
The Seeds of Evil: Abuse of Power and Its Consequences
“Physical contact – physical displays of affection, horseplay, or sexual activities of any kind between inmates, employees, visitors, or volunteers is prohibited.” This injunction is Treasure Lee’s welcome to the adult prison in the superb (but harrowing) Cheryl Dunye film, Stranger Inside.
In the June 2004 issue of Curve magazine, Silja J. A. Talvi explores the ramifications of the arbitrary and often contradictory policies prohibiting physical intimacy in women’s prisons.
According to Talvi, a 2002 Fourth Circuit court of appeals ruling found that “prisoners have no fundamental right to engage in ‘homosexual acts’.” Reasonable enough: if it were otherwise, one might object that sex-segregated institutions constitute de facto discrimination against heterosexuals. But sex itself is not the real issue here.
“The main thing that the [prison administration] does is tha they try to break down any kind of supportive relationship. It doesn’t matter whether it’s sisterly or sexual in nature.”
The real issue is power: the power of the guards to decree what kind of intimacy is permitted and what is not. Former inmate Linda Evans met her current partner, documentarian Eve Goldberg, while Evans was still incarcerated. “Guards would crack down on even the slightest displays of affection between Evans and Goldberg when the two were allowed to visit. (Those rules were not enforced for heterosexual female prisoners, who could kiss, hold hands with and embrace their male partners.)”
The article describes a prison system that appears explicitly structured to break down inmates’ sense of self – and leave it broken. No wonder that, according to the article, “two-thirds of former prisoners, including women, are rearrested within three years.” The “outlaw life” offers a nearly irresistible temptation to many. Compounding the overwhelming discrimination that former inmates face in housing and employment is the psychological damage done by incarceration.
What does such a system teach its inmates, and what does it teach its wardens? It teaches them that there is no objective index of “right” and “wrong”, but rather that what is forbidden or permitted is up to the whim of those in charge. It teaches them that any system of “rules” can be manipulated to serve as a pretext for exploitation. It teaches them that systems of power and authority exist only to gratify the egos of the elite.
It is too early to say what factors contributed to the utter breakdown of discipline and common humanity at the Abu Ghraib prison. But we must speculate that Americans who learned corruption and depravity from a corrupt and depraved prison system, could reasonably be expected to carry the seeds of that evil to their post in Iraq.
|
In the June 2004 issue of Curve magazine, Silja J. A. Talvi explores the ramifications of the arbitrary and often contradictory policies prohibiting physical intimacy in women’s prisons.
According to Talvi, a 2002 Fourth Circuit court of appeals ruling found that “prisoners have no fundamental right to engage in ‘homosexual acts’.” Reasonable enough: if it were otherwise, one might object that sex-segregated institutions constitute de facto discrimination against heterosexuals. But sex itself is not the real issue here.
“The main thing that the [prison administration] does is tha they try to break down any kind of supportive relationship. It doesn’t matter whether it’s sisterly or sexual in nature.”
The real issue is power: the power of the guards to decree what kind of intimacy is permitted and what is not. Former inmate Linda Evans met her current partner, documentarian Eve Goldberg, while Evans was still incarcerated. “Guards would crack down on even the slightest displays of affection between Evans and Goldberg when the two were allowed to visit. (Those rules were not enforced for heterosexual female prisoners, who could kiss, hold hands with and embrace their male partners.)”
The article describes a prison system that appears explicitly structured to break down inmates’ sense of self – and leave it broken. No wonder that, according to the article, “two-thirds of former prisoners, including women, are rearrested within three years.” The “outlaw life” offers a nearly irresistible temptation to many. Compounding the overwhelming discrimination that former inmates face in housing and employment is the psychological damage done by incarceration.
What does such a system teach its inmates, and what does it teach its wardens? It teaches them that there is no objective index of “right” and “wrong”, but rather that what is forbidden or permitted is up to the whim of those in charge. It teaches them that any system of “rules” can be manipulated to serve as a pretext for exploitation. It teaches them that systems of power and authority exist only to gratify the egos of the elite.
It is too early to say what factors contributed to the utter breakdown of discipline and common humanity at the Abu Ghraib prison. But we must speculate that Americans who learned corruption and depravity from a corrupt and depraved prison system, could reasonably be expected to carry the seeds of that evil to their post in Iraq.
Abu Ghraib abuse: the exception, not the rule
... according to Kathryn Jean Lopez in The Corner.
Here's an e-mail she received, and it's worth reading and thinking about:
"Today you reprinted in the Corner some reactions to the Abu Gharib story from readers actually deployed in Iraq. I've just returned home from my Iraq rotation: when I was there, I worked for a unit that (among other things) interrogated high-value detainees -- the "deck of cards" and others. Not only did we have no abuse problem, we had just the opposite: our MP's were too nice to the detainees. It was sort of a reverse Stockholm Syndrome. We had to screen some raw documentary footage for the MPs, showing them explicitly the sort of atrocities committed by the former regime. After that they understood that no matter how friendly and harmless they might seem now, these guys are seriously bad dudes who did some seriously evil things. Of course we still had to treat them humanely and wouldn't have dreamt of doing otherwise, but we also didn't want the detainees forgetting that they were in prison, not a slightly down-market summer camp or retirement home.
Why was Abu Gharib different? Lots of reasons, probably -- but from my own experience, which included working with detainees and MPs and interrogators, I can say that the abusive behavior by the guards there was not only atypical but exactly the opposite of what I saw."
|
Here's an e-mail she received, and it's worth reading and thinking about:
"Today you reprinted in the Corner some reactions to the Abu Gharib story from readers actually deployed in Iraq. I've just returned home from my Iraq rotation: when I was there, I worked for a unit that (among other things) interrogated high-value detainees -- the "deck of cards" and others. Not only did we have no abuse problem, we had just the opposite: our MP's were too nice to the detainees. It was sort of a reverse Stockholm Syndrome. We had to screen some raw documentary footage for the MPs, showing them explicitly the sort of atrocities committed by the former regime. After that they understood that no matter how friendly and harmless they might seem now, these guys are seriously bad dudes who did some seriously evil things. Of course we still had to treat them humanely and wouldn't have dreamt of doing otherwise, but we also didn't want the detainees forgetting that they were in prison, not a slightly down-market summer camp or retirement home.
Why was Abu Gharib different? Lots of reasons, probably -- but from my own experience, which included working with detainees and MPs and interrogators, I can say that the abusive behavior by the guards there was not only atypical but exactly the opposite of what I saw."
"It is not work ... it is abuse."
Donna M. Hughes exposes the myths surrounding prostitution and its legalization in National Review Online. As the Czech Republic ponders joining Australia, the Netherlands, and Germany in legalizing the sex trade, Hughes contrasts the "wishful thinking" behind legalization with its results in the real world. Legalizing the bordello sex trade has not, for instance, reduced the street trade appreciably. The promised tax revenues have not materialized, hardly surprising given that pimps are not in the habit of paying taxes. (The German government is thoughtfully looking for ways to extract more tax revenues from the sex workers themselves.)
Nor, argues Hughes, will legalization improve the lives of women driven to work in the sex trade, because:
"The reason has to do with the basic nature of prostitution. It is not work; it is not a job like any other. It is abuse and exploitation that women only engage in if forced to or when they have no other options. Even where prostitution is legal, a significant proportion of women is trafficked. Women and children controlled by mafias and criminals cannot register with an authority or join a union. Women who are making a more or less free choice to be in prostitution do so out of immediate necessity — debt, unemployment, and poverty. They consider resorting to prostitution as a temporary means of making money, and assume as soon as a debt is paid or a certain sum of money is earned for poverty-stricken families, they will go home. They seldom tell friends or relatives what they are doing to earn money. They do not want to register with authorities and create a permanent record of being a prostitute. And unionization of "sex workers" is a leftist fantasy; it is completely incompatible with the coercive and abusive nature of prostitution."
Read the whole article, please, at the link.
|
Nor, argues Hughes, will legalization improve the lives of women driven to work in the sex trade, because:
"The reason has to do with the basic nature of prostitution. It is not work; it is not a job like any other. It is abuse and exploitation that women only engage in if forced to or when they have no other options. Even where prostitution is legal, a significant proportion of women is trafficked. Women and children controlled by mafias and criminals cannot register with an authority or join a union. Women who are making a more or less free choice to be in prostitution do so out of immediate necessity — debt, unemployment, and poverty. They consider resorting to prostitution as a temporary means of making money, and assume as soon as a debt is paid or a certain sum of money is earned for poverty-stricken families, they will go home. They seldom tell friends or relatives what they are doing to earn money. They do not want to register with authorities and create a permanent record of being a prostitute. And unionization of "sex workers" is a leftist fantasy; it is completely incompatible with the coercive and abusive nature of prostitution."
Read the whole article, please, at the link.
The Iraqi Holocaust
THE IRAQI HOLOCAUST: LIFE UNDER SADDAM
Sam of Hammorabi Lists "Points for the Prosecution"
For those who may have forgotten, or not known, about the atrocities committed under the Ba'athist regime of Saddam Hussein, Sam of the Hammorabi blog lists specific crimes:
1. Hanging in the public places
2. Charging the families the price of the bullets used to kill their beloved ones. The family have to sign a statement that their son is a traitor and are prevented from mourning the death. (This happened to my grandfather after Saddam's regime executed his two sons. Few days after their execution the security men informed him of the death by requesting the price of the bullets).
3. Using the rat poison to kill the detainees. It happened to my uncle who was only 13 years old.
4. Undercover killings by poisoning food or drink. It happened to many highly educated people e.g. university lecturers etc.
5. He killed his cousin Dr Raji Tikriti after Kuwait invasion by putting him in a cage with 25 starved dogs. The dogs attacked Raji Tikriti in front of Saddam ministers. After few minutes Raji was bones with out meat!
6. They could arrest up to the 6th degree relatives of the detained person for no reason but to make him confess by torturing and humiliating them in front of him. This happened to my father's cousin and his 15 years old son after they arrested his eldest son.
7. Smuggling escaped people from outside Iraq and killing them. This happened to my cousin after they arrested and killed his brother who was only a teenager. His family only discovered that he was killed after the liberation of Iraq in 9th April 2003. Before that they thought that he was in the Europe. He was in fact smuggled from Kuwait when the relations were OK between Saddam and the Kuwaiti government in 1980s and executed by Saddam's Mukhabarat.
8. Putting many prisoners in one small cell as to deprive them from rest and sleep.
9. Using dark and isolated cells deep under ground. The prisoner receives a piece of bread and water or soup through a hole opened once a day.
10. Horror cells by using different ways to horrify the prisoner.
11. Teeth pulling
12. Immersion of the person in a tank filled with strong acid until he or she dissolves away
...
This is only the beginning.
...
|
Sam of Hammorabi Lists "Points for the Prosecution"
For those who may have forgotten, or not known, about the atrocities committed under the Ba'athist regime of Saddam Hussein, Sam of the Hammorabi blog lists specific crimes:
1. Hanging in the public places
2. Charging the families the price of the bullets used to kill their beloved ones. The family have to sign a statement that their son is a traitor and are prevented from mourning the death. (This happened to my grandfather after Saddam's regime executed his two sons. Few days after their execution the security men informed him of the death by requesting the price of the bullets).
3. Using the rat poison to kill the detainees. It happened to my uncle who was only 13 years old.
4. Undercover killings by poisoning food or drink. It happened to many highly educated people e.g. university lecturers etc.
5. He killed his cousin Dr Raji Tikriti after Kuwait invasion by putting him in a cage with 25 starved dogs. The dogs attacked Raji Tikriti in front of Saddam ministers. After few minutes Raji was bones with out meat!
6. They could arrest up to the 6th degree relatives of the detained person for no reason but to make him confess by torturing and humiliating them in front of him. This happened to my father's cousin and his 15 years old son after they arrested his eldest son.
7. Smuggling escaped people from outside Iraq and killing them. This happened to my cousin after they arrested and killed his brother who was only a teenager. His family only discovered that he was killed after the liberation of Iraq in 9th April 2003. Before that they thought that he was in the Europe. He was in fact smuggled from Kuwait when the relations were OK between Saddam and the Kuwaiti government in 1980s and executed by Saddam's Mukhabarat.
8. Putting many prisoners in one small cell as to deprive them from rest and sleep.
9. Using dark and isolated cells deep under ground. The prisoner receives a piece of bread and water or soup through a hole opened once a day.
10. Horror cells by using different ways to horrify the prisoner.
11. Teeth pulling
12. Immersion of the person in a tank filled with strong acid until he or she dissolves away
...
This is only the beginning.
...
Morning Report: May 11, 2004
- Return to Fallujah. (Belmont Club) As Fallujah residents weary of the presence of al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army, US forces have recruited officers and soldiers from their former opponents, raising eyebrows at the Pentagon, Wretchard reports. Noting that both al-Sadr and the killers of the four Blackwater contractors remain at large, BC also cautions that US divide-and-conquer tactics may backfire. “The Iraq America set out to build” must ultimately be unified and centrally governed; “erecting a nation from the center” will lead more lasting results than a patchwork of local alliances.
- Sharon’s “non-plan”. (Debka) Debka says that President Bush will have little time to hear details of Sharon’s revised Gaza disengagement plan – or “non-plan”, a term Debka attributes to Condoleezza Rice. Rice’s Israeli counterpart, Giora Eiland, questioned the likelihood of the plan’s being “applied at any time in the near future”. The Israeli analysis further suggests that the May meeting between Rice and Palestinian leader Ahmed Qureia might have been an attempt by Sharon to “persuade former Gaza strongman Mohammed Dahlan to re-instate himself in the Gaza Strip and generate conditions suitable for implementing disengagement.” Debka caustically cites this move as “a further sign that [Sharon] is at his wits’ end.”
- Iranian activists mull response to possible air strike. (Free Iran) Rumors of a possible airstrike by Israel or the US, aimed at crippling the Iranian regime’s suspected nuclear weapons program, draw discussion on the Free Iran message board.
- Myth of unity. (Healing Iraq) Zeyad reports that the past weekend saw a show of unity between anti-American Sunni and pro-Sadr Shia groups in Baghdad. The event culminated in the formation of an alliance called Hai’yat al-Ulema al-Muwaheda, whose Sunni contingent was led by Harith al-Dhari, known for his connections with the former regime. Historically, Zeyad says, such alliances have proved shallow and short-lived.
- Emmett Till case reopened. (Reuters) The US Justice Department on Monday reopened an investigation into the sadistic 1955 killing of fourteen-year-old Emmett Till, whose death energized the civil rights movement.
|
- Sharon’s “non-plan”. (Debka) Debka says that President Bush will have little time to hear details of Sharon’s revised Gaza disengagement plan – or “non-plan”, a term Debka attributes to Condoleezza Rice. Rice’s Israeli counterpart, Giora Eiland, questioned the likelihood of the plan’s being “applied at any time in the near future”. The Israeli analysis further suggests that the May meeting between Rice and Palestinian leader Ahmed Qureia might have been an attempt by Sharon to “persuade former Gaza strongman Mohammed Dahlan to re-instate himself in the Gaza Strip and generate conditions suitable for implementing disengagement.” Debka caustically cites this move as “a further sign that [Sharon] is at his wits’ end.”
- Iranian activists mull response to possible air strike. (Free Iran) Rumors of a possible airstrike by Israel or the US, aimed at crippling the Iranian regime’s suspected nuclear weapons program, draw discussion on the Free Iran message board.
- Myth of unity. (Healing Iraq) Zeyad reports that the past weekend saw a show of unity between anti-American Sunni and pro-Sadr Shia groups in Baghdad. The event culminated in the formation of an alliance called Hai’yat al-Ulema al-Muwaheda, whose Sunni contingent was led by Harith al-Dhari, known for his connections with the former regime. Historically, Zeyad says, such alliances have proved shallow and short-lived.
- Emmett Till case reopened. (Reuters) The US Justice Department on Monday reopened an investigation into the sadistic 1955 killing of fourteen-year-old Emmett Till, whose death energized the civil rights movement.
Monday, May 10, 2004
No, Virginia
No, you may not marry.
Nor may you act as if you are married.
Nor may you sign any contract purporting to bestow the privileges or obligations of marriage.
You may not love, nor may you commit your support to your partner.
You may not remind us that our laws discriminate against you.
You may not remind us that your relationships are as holy and sacred as those our laws have deemed worthy of sanctifying.
You may not take the sanctity of union into your own hands, for that privilege is reserved unto the Ecclesiastical Court of the State of Virginia.
You may not make any law respecting an establishment of union, for it is the task of this State to separate the holy from the profane, the pure from the impure, the blessed from those deserving of everlasting damnation.
No, Virginia, there is no love; nor shall there be, except as we declare it.
Thanks: Andrew Sullivan
|
Nor may you act as if you are married.
Nor may you sign any contract purporting to bestow the privileges or obligations of marriage.
You may not love, nor may you commit your support to your partner.
You may not remind us that our laws discriminate against you.
You may not remind us that your relationships are as holy and sacred as those our laws have deemed worthy of sanctifying.
You may not take the sanctity of union into your own hands, for that privilege is reserved unto the Ecclesiastical Court of the State of Virginia.
You may not make any law respecting an establishment of union, for it is the task of this State to separate the holy from the profane, the pure from the impure, the blessed from those deserving of everlasting damnation.
No, Virginia, there is no love; nor shall there be, except as we declare it.
Thanks: Andrew Sullivan
Zeyad Lays Down the Law
Healing Iraq is now off-limits to trolls! And good riddance to them, too. For those of you just joining us, the prominent Iraqi blogger Zeyad has been experiencing an ever-increasing volume of off-topic and hostile traffic in his Comments corner. He's just announced a policy of "no more Mr. Nice Guy" which will make life easier for those of us who want to have a real discussion.
On a more serious note, Zeyad also discusses the US reaction - and in the view of some Iraqis, perhaps over-reaction - to the Abu Graib scandal. He notes that many former prisoners of the Ba'athist regime contrast the present international outcry with the silence that surrounded far greater atrocities under Saddam. Zeyad also warns of an upsurge in banditry - already a serious problem - if large numbers of dangerous criminals are released as a result of the scandal.
|
On a more serious note, Zeyad also discusses the US reaction - and in the view of some Iraqis, perhaps over-reaction - to the Abu Graib scandal. He notes that many former prisoners of the Ba'athist regime contrast the present international outcry with the silence that surrounded far greater atrocities under Saddam. Zeyad also warns of an upsurge in banditry - already a serious problem - if large numbers of dangerous criminals are released as a result of the scandal.
Quote of the Day
"If you believe that you can damage, then believe that you can fix.
If you believe that you can harm, then believe that you can heal."
- Rabbi Nachman of Breslov (1772-1810)
as quoted by Rabbi Chaim Kramer in I Am Jewish: Personal Reflectionns Inspired by the Last Words of Daniel Pearl, edited by Judea and Ruth Pearl
|
If you believe that you can harm, then believe that you can heal."
- Rabbi Nachman of Breslov (1772-1810)
as quoted by Rabbi Chaim Kramer in I Am Jewish: Personal Reflectionns Inspired by the Last Words of Daniel Pearl, edited by Judea and Ruth Pearl
Morning Report: May 10, 2004
- Chechen president Kadyrov assassinated. (Various) Ahmad Kadyrov, the pro-Russian president of Chechnya appointed by Russian president Vladimir Putin, was killed on Sunday along with an uncertain number of other VIPs and citizens. A bomb planted at the Dynamo stadium in Grozny, the Chechen capital, exploded at 10:35am local time (0635 GMT) at a ceremony commemorating victory in WWII. Analysts say the assassination represents a devastating blow to prospects for peace in Chechnya. Chechen Prime Minister Sergei Abramov will take over as acting leader.
Links:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3697715.stm
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/05/10/grozy.blast/index.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,119394,00.html – Contains very good analysis.
|
Links:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3697715.stm
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/05/10/grozy.blast/index.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,119394,00.html – Contains very good analysis.
Sunday, May 09, 2004
Rumsfeld
should stay, argues William Safire, who is always worth reading.
|
Morning Report: May 9, 2004
- NYT, Stuttaford call for prison reform. (New York Times, National Review) Andrew Stuttaford joins the New York Times in calling for reform in American prisons.
- Ali: a conversation about AG. (Iraq the Model) Ali recently spoke with another Iraqi doctor about the revelations from Abu Ghraib. The usually apolitical friend responded with surprising fervor. Ali recalls the conversation, and also echoes the theme stressed in this site, that the American investigation must serve as a model for Iraqis when they gain control of their own affairs.
- VDH on America’s war. (National Review) Victor Davis Hanson reflects on the enemy’s tactics: “their modus operandi is to push us all the way up to war”, wearing us down rather than facing us on a traditional battlefield. VDH concludes that we must not stand down, and that we need “more democracy in the Middle East, not less”. Above all, he says, we must “return to an audacious and entirely unpredictable combat mode” in order to finally secure this “weird peace” in Iraq.
- Crowd attacks regime speakers in Tehran. (SMCCDI/Daneshjoo). Following a protest from families of victims of Islamic regime violence, SMCCDI reports that Iranian citizens attacked officials and clashed with security forces at an event in Tehran. The latest incident comes as an increasingly nervous regime anticipates unrest on the anniversary of last year’s uprisings, and a possible American or Israeli response to its nuclear program.
- Pride in Rhea County. (AP) Friday’s anti-gay demonstrations in Rhea County, Tennessee were answered by a rally of more than 400 gay people and their allies on Saturday, AP reports. Rhea County gained notoriety in March for having adopted a resolution that would have banned gay people from the county; the resolution was overturned two days later.
- Oregon connection in Madrid bombing. (The Oregonian) The May 8 print edition of The Oregonian reports that a fingerprint has linked former US Army officer Brandon Mayfield to the March 11 bombing attacks in Madrid, Spain. Mayfield, a 37-year-old resident of Aloha, Oregon, is thought to be linked to other Portland-area residents who have not yet been charged.
|
- Ali: a conversation about AG. (Iraq the Model) Ali recently spoke with another Iraqi doctor about the revelations from Abu Ghraib. The usually apolitical friend responded with surprising fervor. Ali recalls the conversation, and also echoes the theme stressed in this site, that the American investigation must serve as a model for Iraqis when they gain control of their own affairs.
- VDH on America’s war. (National Review) Victor Davis Hanson reflects on the enemy’s tactics: “their modus operandi is to push us all the way up to war”, wearing us down rather than facing us on a traditional battlefield. VDH concludes that we must not stand down, and that we need “more democracy in the Middle East, not less”. Above all, he says, we must “return to an audacious and entirely unpredictable combat mode” in order to finally secure this “weird peace” in Iraq.
- Crowd attacks regime speakers in Tehran. (SMCCDI/Daneshjoo). Following a protest from families of victims of Islamic regime violence, SMCCDI reports that Iranian citizens attacked officials and clashed with security forces at an event in Tehran. The latest incident comes as an increasingly nervous regime anticipates unrest on the anniversary of last year’s uprisings, and a possible American or Israeli response to its nuclear program.
- Pride in Rhea County. (AP) Friday’s anti-gay demonstrations in Rhea County, Tennessee were answered by a rally of more than 400 gay people and their allies on Saturday, AP reports. Rhea County gained notoriety in March for having adopted a resolution that would have banned gay people from the county; the resolution was overturned two days later.
- Oregon connection in Madrid bombing. (The Oregonian) The May 8 print edition of The Oregonian reports that a fingerprint has linked former US Army officer Brandon Mayfield to the March 11 bombing attacks in Madrid, Spain. Mayfield, a 37-year-old resident of Aloha, Oregon, is thought to be linked to other Portland-area residents who have not yet been charged.
Kabbala-la Land
In the May 10 print edition of The New Republic, Yossi Klein Halevi looks at Yehuda Berg’s Kabbalah Centre and its appeal in Hollywood. I’ll have more to say on this later.
|
America the Model
As I’ve stated in various points around the blogosphere, the most important thing for America to do in the wake of the Abu Ghraib scandal is to practice “leadership by example” and make an example of those who were involved in the abuse. We must at all times bear in mind that not only will the world judge us by our handling of this matter, but – perhaps even more importantly – the new Iraqi nation will look to us for real-life instruction in how a free and democratic society purges itself of fascist tendencies. It is safe to say that the “six morons” of Abu Ghraib are the most hated people in America today. We must demonstrate that the due process of law and a fair, impartial trial are what is needed to bring them to justice. We must also learn hard lessons about the horrific conditions in our own prison system – and make changes fast.
|
Saturday, May 08, 2004
Flying Saucers over Iraq
From the Spirit of America update:
Following is a message and photo from LtCol John Lutkenhouse about the Marines giving Frisbees and soccer balls to children near Fallujah. You'll enjoy it. Photos are at:
http://www.spiritofamerica.net/blog/archives/000073.html#more
When the Marines asked us for Frisbees in January it was specifically because they would foster interaction between the Marines and the local children. The Marines knew there was not much they could teach Iraqi children about soccer but Frisbees offered a teaching and laughing opportunity. The real point is the interaction - that's where relationships are built and opinions formed. The gift itself is more of a side note. That said, soccer balls are very popular and we're providing them, too.
Soon you'll getting more information about our plan to increase the scope and scale of our efforts to help turn the tide in Iraq. For those of you who have expressed an interest in getting things going in your company or community there will many opportunities to help. Many of you have written to us saying that "we cannot afford to fail" in Iraq. I agree. So does everyone working on the SoA team. And, I know that in the last 3 weeks we've only seem a glimpse of what the American people want to do to help win peace and freedom for Iraq and Afghanistan. We're committed to providing focus and direction to your desire to help.
If you replied to our last message about the TV equipment being delivered to Camp Pendleton, we did not receive it. That technical problem has been fixed. An always reliable way to reach us is through staff@spiritofamerica.net
All the best,
Jim Hake & the Spirit of America team
-----Original Message-----
From: Lutkenhouse LtCol John F]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:57 PM
To: Jim Hake
Cc: Manske Col Michael W
Subject: Impact of SoA
Jim,
Here is a little write-up from a guy by the name of LtCol Colin McNease. He is the Civil Affairs Officer with RCT-1 (Regimental Combat Team 1), the guys that were involved in the recent fighting in Fallujah. He talks about a recent event in which the items donated by Spirit of America really helped him establish a positive relationship with folks in a local village. This is all the more significant when you note that the village is only 3K from Fallujah, the site of the heavy fighting a couple of weeks back. These are LtCol McNease's own unedited words and description of events. I thought you might like it. Also attached are some photos. LtCol McNease is the one standing in the group of children. Thanks again for your support and to all those who have donated to Spirit of America.
SF,
John
----------------
Message from LtCol McNease
We went out to the village where the tank got stuck, about 3 km northeast of Fallujah. The area is a dirt road farming village of conrete or mud brick houses strung along a single road which runs from a cemetery to a 'T' intersection. The people have gotten to know the Marines since the tank spent a week there before we could pull it out. They were friendly to the Marines who already felt bad about trashing their canals and fields while trying to unstick the M1A1. When we went out to pay damage claims for all the lost crops and date plam trees and torn up roads, we saw a lot of kids around and met a few of them. This made us think of the SoA stuff, especially the soccer balls and frisbees, we had been sent and had back on Camp Fallujah.
The next time we went to visit the village, we took as many of the soccer balls and frisbees as we could fit into the open space in the back of our hummers (around chow, water, ammunition, radio batteries, etc.) When we arrived at the village and parked the HMMVWs in the center, some shy but curious kids were peeking out from doorways or looking out their windows. But when we pulled out the soccer balls and handed the first one out, they started coming out like ants to a picnic.
None of them wanted frisbees at first, all really wnated the soccer balls. But when we ran out of soccer balls and kept handing out frisbees they would line up to take them, sometimes trying to get more than one, and many making sure their little brothers or sisters got one as well. They didn't know what to make of the frisbees at first, holding and throwing them like dinner plates, but once they had a little professional military education on how to operate the frisbee and were checked out on it, a lot of them became surprisingly good surprisingly quickly. I spent almost 45 minutes tossing the disc with one very young girl who got to be quite accomplished.
Some of the the kids' parents and some of the older kids who could read did pick up on the friendship message and would point to the english and then point to the arabic and give us a thumbs up to show that they understood that they meant the same thing in both our languages.
This took place at a time when we were being shot at in most every other place we went so it was particularly gratifying, and it was nice to have something good to give them. Other things they seem particularly crazy about are sunglasses (they always want ours) and colored pens.
|
Following is a message and photo from LtCol John Lutkenhouse about the Marines giving Frisbees and soccer balls to children near Fallujah. You'll enjoy it. Photos are at:
http://www.spiritofamerica.net/blog/archives/000073.html#more
When the Marines asked us for Frisbees in January it was specifically because they would foster interaction between the Marines and the local children. The Marines knew there was not much they could teach Iraqi children about soccer but Frisbees offered a teaching and laughing opportunity. The real point is the interaction - that's where relationships are built and opinions formed. The gift itself is more of a side note. That said, soccer balls are very popular and we're providing them, too.
Soon you'll getting more information about our plan to increase the scope and scale of our efforts to help turn the tide in Iraq. For those of you who have expressed an interest in getting things going in your company or community there will many opportunities to help. Many of you have written to us saying that "we cannot afford to fail" in Iraq. I agree. So does everyone working on the SoA team. And, I know that in the last 3 weeks we've only seem a glimpse of what the American people want to do to help win peace and freedom for Iraq and Afghanistan. We're committed to providing focus and direction to your desire to help.
If you replied to our last message about the TV equipment being delivered to Camp Pendleton, we did not receive it. That technical problem has been fixed. An always reliable way to reach us is through staff@spiritofamerica.net
All the best,
Jim Hake & the Spirit of America team
-----Original Message-----
From: Lutkenhouse LtCol John F]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:57 PM
To: Jim Hake
Cc: Manske Col Michael W
Subject: Impact of SoA
Jim,
Here is a little write-up from a guy by the name of LtCol Colin McNease. He is the Civil Affairs Officer with RCT-1 (Regimental Combat Team 1), the guys that were involved in the recent fighting in Fallujah. He talks about a recent event in which the items donated by Spirit of America really helped him establish a positive relationship with folks in a local village. This is all the more significant when you note that the village is only 3K from Fallujah, the site of the heavy fighting a couple of weeks back. These are LtCol McNease's own unedited words and description of events. I thought you might like it. Also attached are some photos. LtCol McNease is the one standing in the group of children. Thanks again for your support and to all those who have donated to Spirit of America.
SF,
John
----------------
Message from LtCol McNease
We went out to the village where the tank got stuck, about 3 km northeast of Fallujah. The area is a dirt road farming village of conrete or mud brick houses strung along a single road which runs from a cemetery to a 'T' intersection. The people have gotten to know the Marines since the tank spent a week there before we could pull it out. They were friendly to the Marines who already felt bad about trashing their canals and fields while trying to unstick the M1A1. When we went out to pay damage claims for all the lost crops and date plam trees and torn up roads, we saw a lot of kids around and met a few of them. This made us think of the SoA stuff, especially the soccer balls and frisbees, we had been sent and had back on Camp Fallujah.
The next time we went to visit the village, we took as many of the soccer balls and frisbees as we could fit into the open space in the back of our hummers (around chow, water, ammunition, radio batteries, etc.) When we arrived at the village and parked the HMMVWs in the center, some shy but curious kids were peeking out from doorways or looking out their windows. But when we pulled out the soccer balls and handed the first one out, they started coming out like ants to a picnic.
None of them wanted frisbees at first, all really wnated the soccer balls. But when we ran out of soccer balls and kept handing out frisbees they would line up to take them, sometimes trying to get more than one, and many making sure their little brothers or sisters got one as well. They didn't know what to make of the frisbees at first, holding and throwing them like dinner plates, but once they had a little professional military education on how to operate the frisbee and were checked out on it, a lot of them became surprisingly good surprisingly quickly. I spent almost 45 minutes tossing the disc with one very young girl who got to be quite accomplished.
Some of the the kids' parents and some of the older kids who could read did pick up on the friendship message and would point to the english and then point to the arabic and give us a thumbs up to show that they understood that they meant the same thing in both our languages.
This took place at a time when we were being shot at in most every other place we went so it was particularly gratifying, and it was nice to have something good to give them. Other things they seem particularly crazy about are sunglasses (they always want ours) and colored pens.
Friday, May 07, 2004
Mothers' Day Message
from iAbolish
Dear Reader,
This Sunday, as you celebrate Mother's Day, I urge you to
consider a startling fact -- the overwhelming majority of slaves
today are women and children -- mothers, sons and daughters.
From Brazil to Bombay, from San Diego to Sudan, millions of
mothers and their children are not free to celebrate Mother's
Day.
One of them might well be Naseem Siraj, whose story has recently
made the pages of the Boston Globe and Boston Herald. She
traveled to Oman in hopes of finding employment to support her
children back in India. From there, she says she was trafficked
to a suburb of Boston, where she was exploited into domestic
slavery and separated from her children. Thanks to the work of
dedicated abolitionists, she is now free.
The American Anti-Slavery Group speaks out on behalf of slaves.
Indeed, our leading spokespeople are themselves survivors of
slavery: Francis Bok, author of the gripping autobiography
"Escape from Slavery," and Abuk Bak, an escaped slave and mother
who recently confronted the Sudanese ambassador to the U.S.
demanding reparations and an apology for Khartoum's egregious
record of human rights abuses that continue today.
Indeed, this Mother's Day is being overshadowed by a stream of
news reports out of Sudan describing the government's ethnic
cleansing of African Muslim tribes in the Darfur region. As we
mark the tenth anniversary of the genocide in Rwanda, a genocide
looms in Western Sudan.
As part of the Sudanese government's ethnic cleansing campaign,
militiamen raid villages, destroying houses, murdering civilians
and abducting women and children in a fashion disturbingly
similar to the slave raids that have plagued Southern Sudan for
decades.
While UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan recently voiced concern
about the destructive raids in Darfur, the Sudanese government
was just re-elected to the United Nations Human Rights
Commission.
Yet while the slave masters sit at the United Nations, we will
not be silent. This Mother's Day we are launching an emergency
appeal to help us continue to speak truth to power -- to give
mothers like Abuk Bak a global platform to confront slave
masters. With your support, millions silenced in slavery around
the world at last have a voice.
We appeal to you to make a donation today in honor of your
mother. Just visit www.iabolish.com/donate to donate online or
call us toll-free at 1-800-884-0719. We thank you so much for
your support as we seek to stop ethnic cleansing and rescue
mothers and their children from slavery.
In Freedom,
Charles Jacobs
|
Dear Reader,
This Sunday, as you celebrate Mother's Day, I urge you to
consider a startling fact -- the overwhelming majority of slaves
today are women and children -- mothers, sons and daughters.
From Brazil to Bombay, from San Diego to Sudan, millions of
mothers and their children are not free to celebrate Mother's
Day.
One of them might well be Naseem Siraj, whose story has recently
made the pages of the Boston Globe and Boston Herald. She
traveled to Oman in hopes of finding employment to support her
children back in India. From there, she says she was trafficked
to a suburb of Boston, where she was exploited into domestic
slavery and separated from her children. Thanks to the work of
dedicated abolitionists, she is now free.
The American Anti-Slavery Group speaks out on behalf of slaves.
Indeed, our leading spokespeople are themselves survivors of
slavery: Francis Bok, author of the gripping autobiography
"Escape from Slavery," and Abuk Bak, an escaped slave and mother
who recently confronted the Sudanese ambassador to the U.S.
demanding reparations and an apology for Khartoum's egregious
record of human rights abuses that continue today.
Indeed, this Mother's Day is being overshadowed by a stream of
news reports out of Sudan describing the government's ethnic
cleansing of African Muslim tribes in the Darfur region. As we
mark the tenth anniversary of the genocide in Rwanda, a genocide
looms in Western Sudan.
As part of the Sudanese government's ethnic cleansing campaign,
militiamen raid villages, destroying houses, murdering civilians
and abducting women and children in a fashion disturbingly
similar to the slave raids that have plagued Southern Sudan for
decades.
While UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan recently voiced concern
about the destructive raids in Darfur, the Sudanese government
was just re-elected to the United Nations Human Rights
Commission.
Yet while the slave masters sit at the United Nations, we will
not be silent. This Mother's Day we are launching an emergency
appeal to help us continue to speak truth to power -- to give
mothers like Abuk Bak a global platform to confront slave
masters. With your support, millions silenced in slavery around
the world at last have a voice.
We appeal to you to make a donation today in honor of your
mother. Just visit www.iabolish.com/donate to donate online or
call us toll-free at 1-800-884-0719. We thank you so much for
your support as we seek to stop ethnic cleansing and rescue
mothers and their children from slavery.
In Freedom,
Charles Jacobs
Rumsfeld
needs to step down.
"The BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says Mr Rumsfeld's abrasive style has won him many enemies on Capitol Hill," the BBC report adds helpfully.
Indeed so, and Mr. Rumsfeld's "abrasive style" has been one of the many things I'v admired about him, along with that "steely note of defiance" that Justin Webb observed. I judge a person by their enemies as well as their friends.
But I don't see how the Defense Department can retain its credibility as long as he remains Secretary of Defense. This is just too serious. Rumsfeld has done much to advance the war effort. He can now best help by doing the honorable thing and resigning.
|
"The BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says Mr Rumsfeld's abrasive style has won him many enemies on Capitol Hill," the BBC report adds helpfully.
Indeed so, and Mr. Rumsfeld's "abrasive style" has been one of the many things I'v admired about him, along with that "steely note of defiance" that Justin Webb observed. I judge a person by their enemies as well as their friends.
But I don't see how the Defense Department can retain its credibility as long as he remains Secretary of Defense. This is just too serious. Rumsfeld has done much to advance the war effort. He can now best help by doing the honorable thing and resigning.
He lied.
|Text of the Taguba Report
may be found here.
|
Quote of the Day
“It is difficult to imagine that international opinion has been changed, only confirmed. Some will recognize America's unfaltering commitment, if not execution, to the importance of human dignity. Some will see a double standard, the tyranny of power, and a campaign against Muslims. Few opinions will have changed. The beauty is that America has changed, for the better, as it has so many times before.” - Jane, Armies of Liberation
|
Two Views of Abu Ghraib
TWO VIEWS OF ABU GHRAIB. (Head Heeb, Belmont Club) Noting that “it is in the nature of counterinsurgencies” to blur the line between enemy and civilians, the Head Heeb asserts that “We need to leave [Iraq] while we still have a choice.” (I have taken some slight exception to this conclusion – see Comments.) The Belmont Club draws a different lesson: Wretchard explains that conflicts unresolved – that is, wars unwon – soon degenerate into endless cycles of mindless bloodshed. Wretchard’s analysis reminds us that the dehumanizing effects of war are by no means limited to counterinsurgencies, but are part of conventional warfare as well – which is exactly why wars, including this one, must be ended quickly and decisively.
CLARIFICATION:
For my part, I think we are all agreed on the need to turn control of Iraq over to the Iraqis as soon as possible. For a better understanding of Jonathan's position, I'll let the HH tell it in his own words:
What productive purpose is our continued presence in Iraq serving? Getting rid of Saddam - that job's done. Eliminating WMDs - well, no. Fighting terrorism - sure, but at this point the terrorism is mostly local and occupation-inspired rather than the sort of global terror we should really be fighting. Preventing anarchy - maybe, but at this point it seems more like we're preventing natural political evolution. Increasing American political leverage - we're doing quite the opposite of that at this point. Cleaning up the mess - a noble cause, certainly, but our best efforts seem only to make the mess worse.
If we keep winning all the battles but the situation keeps getting worse, then I think our presence might fairly be described as counterproductive.
|
CLARIFICATION:
For my part, I think we are all agreed on the need to turn control of Iraq over to the Iraqis as soon as possible. For a better understanding of Jonathan's position, I'll let the HH tell it in his own words:
What productive purpose is our continued presence in Iraq serving? Getting rid of Saddam - that job's done. Eliminating WMDs - well, no. Fighting terrorism - sure, but at this point the terrorism is mostly local and occupation-inspired rather than the sort of global terror we should really be fighting. Preventing anarchy - maybe, but at this point it seems more like we're preventing natural political evolution. Increasing American political leverage - we're doing quite the opposite of that at this point. Cleaning up the mess - a noble cause, certainly, but our best efforts seem only to make the mess worse.
If we keep winning all the battles but the situation keeps getting worse, then I think our presence might fairly be described as counterproductive.
Morning Report: May 7, 2004
Morning Report will be on liberty Saturday, May 8, for Shabbat. Returning to duty on Sunday, May 9.
· Mashahr clashes. (SMCCDI/Daneshjoo) Daneshjoo reports clashes in Mahshahr, Iran, after regime security forces attacked demonstrators protesting the planned Kosaran Dam.
· Sharon’s Gaza withdrawal. (Head Heeb) Jonathan announces that Ariel Sharon has assured European leaders he will go forward with the Gaza disengagement plan, without modifying its main points.
· Omar considers a career move. (Iraq the Model, The Mesopotamian) And he shares Arab reaction to Abu Ghraib. Alaa weighs in as well.
|
· Mashahr clashes. (SMCCDI/Daneshjoo) Daneshjoo reports clashes in Mahshahr, Iran, after regime security forces attacked demonstrators protesting the planned Kosaran Dam.
· Sharon’s Gaza withdrawal. (Head Heeb) Jonathan announces that Ariel Sharon has assured European leaders he will go forward with the Gaza disengagement plan, without modifying its main points.
· Omar considers a career move. (Iraq the Model, The Mesopotamian) And he shares Arab reaction to Abu Ghraib. Alaa weighs in as well.
Thursday, May 06, 2004
State vs. Defense - and the Chalabi Charge
When you first read the article linked at my post “Chalabi Aiding Iranian Mullahs?”, didn’t you think it was just a tiny bit curious that “intelligence agencies” (meaning the CIA) were suddenly concerned about about those Iranian insurgents in Iraq? Especially when the Agency has never said peep about them? I know, it sounded odd to me too. But, according to the Newsweek piece, “the State Department and the CIA are using the intelligence about his Iran ties to persuade the president to cut him loose once and for all” [my emphasis – aa]. While “Chalabi still has loyal defenders among some neoconservatives in the Pentagon,” according to the article. (Those pesky neoconservatives! That damn Pentagon!)
In an April 30 article, Barbara Lerner addresses criticisms of what has been termed “Rumsfeld’s occupation” of Iraq. “First,” she says, “it’s not Rumsfeld’s occupation; it’s Colin Powell’s and George Tenet’s.” And second, that’s the problem. And one more thing: now there’s talk of handing Iraq over to the United Nations and Lakhdar Brahimi.
There are two factions at work in Washington: one, led by the White House and the Defense Department, and the other, led by the CIA and the State Department. According to Lerner, “Rumsfeld’s plan was to equip – and then transport to Iraq – some 10,000 Shia and Sunni freedom fighters led by Shia exile leader Ahmed Chalabi” to join Kurdish freedom fighters led by Jalal Talabani and Massoud Barzani. General Garner would have then handed power over to these three, and six others, in “a matter of weeks – not months or years” thus greatly enhancing the legitimacy of the new Iraqi government.
But State and the CIA had other ideas. Garner was replaced with State man Paul Bremer. The Iraqi exile force was slashed to a few hundred, while Rumsfeld’s trio was inflated to a total of 25, with the result that “Bremer’s face [was] the only one most Iraqis saw.”
In Bemer’s GC, many Iraqis “saw a foreign occupation occupation of potentially endless length” led by untrustworthy Americans, while Syria and Iran set about trying to carve up the newly liberated Iraq.
Now check out David Frum’s new piece (May 6). Money quote: “Those inside the government pushing the line that Mr. Chalabi has divulged secrets to the Iranians come from the same bureaucracies, the State Department and CIA, that have also advocated for the inclusion of Iraqi parties with more open links to Tehran in the Iraqi Governing Council, such as the Dawa Party.” Attention, Department of Pots and Kettles.
And speaking of Foggy Bottom and Tehran, read this from Frum’s May 5 post:
“And those intrepid foes of Iranian imperialism at the State Department? What have they done? In March 2004, Colin Powell agreed with the European allies to drop US demands for Security Council action against Iran. US policy is now one of “engagement” with Iran – even as Iran hosts al Qaeda on its territory and supports terrorism inside Iraq.” For Frum’s devastating analysis, read the whole post at the link.
But I digress. Back to the original question: Is the Iraq occupation Powell’s or Rumsfeld’s? With the horrifying revelations that have come to light since Barbara Lerner’s article was published, Rumsfeld’s reputation is now badly tarnished. But in any event, Lerner is adamant that the occupation must not be Brahimi’s. “The UN as a whole is bad; Lakhdar Brahimi is worse,” she writes. “Men like Chalabi, Talabani, and Barzani have nothing but contempt for Mr. Brahimi, the UN, and the Old Europe.” These are the ones we must support – regardless of where Rumsfeld’s career may take him.
|
In an April 30 article, Barbara Lerner addresses criticisms of what has been termed “Rumsfeld’s occupation” of Iraq. “First,” she says, “it’s not Rumsfeld’s occupation; it’s Colin Powell’s and George Tenet’s.” And second, that’s the problem. And one more thing: now there’s talk of handing Iraq over to the United Nations and Lakhdar Brahimi.
There are two factions at work in Washington: one, led by the White House and the Defense Department, and the other, led by the CIA and the State Department. According to Lerner, “Rumsfeld’s plan was to equip – and then transport to Iraq – some 10,000 Shia and Sunni freedom fighters led by Shia exile leader Ahmed Chalabi” to join Kurdish freedom fighters led by Jalal Talabani and Massoud Barzani. General Garner would have then handed power over to these three, and six others, in “a matter of weeks – not months or years” thus greatly enhancing the legitimacy of the new Iraqi government.
But State and the CIA had other ideas. Garner was replaced with State man Paul Bremer. The Iraqi exile force was slashed to a few hundred, while Rumsfeld’s trio was inflated to a total of 25, with the result that “Bremer’s face [was] the only one most Iraqis saw.”
In Bemer’s GC, many Iraqis “saw a foreign occupation occupation of potentially endless length” led by untrustworthy Americans, while Syria and Iran set about trying to carve up the newly liberated Iraq.
Now check out David Frum’s new piece (May 6). Money quote: “Those inside the government pushing the line that Mr. Chalabi has divulged secrets to the Iranians come from the same bureaucracies, the State Department and CIA, that have also advocated for the inclusion of Iraqi parties with more open links to Tehran in the Iraqi Governing Council, such as the Dawa Party.” Attention, Department of Pots and Kettles.
And speaking of Foggy Bottom and Tehran, read this from Frum’s May 5 post:
“And those intrepid foes of Iranian imperialism at the State Department? What have they done? In March 2004, Colin Powell agreed with the European allies to drop US demands for Security Council action against Iran. US policy is now one of “engagement” with Iran – even as Iran hosts al Qaeda on its territory and supports terrorism inside Iraq.” For Frum’s devastating analysis, read the whole post at the link.
But I digress. Back to the original question: Is the Iraq occupation Powell’s or Rumsfeld’s? With the horrifying revelations that have come to light since Barbara Lerner’s article was published, Rumsfeld’s reputation is now badly tarnished. But in any event, Lerner is adamant that the occupation must not be Brahimi’s. “The UN as a whole is bad; Lakhdar Brahimi is worse,” she writes. “Men like Chalabi, Talabani, and Barzani have nothing but contempt for Mr. Brahimi, the UN, and the Old Europe.” These are the ones we must support – regardless of where Rumsfeld’s career may take him.
Disengagement
Evoking Ellen DeGeneres, Clifford D. May insists that Ariel Sharon does, after all, have a strategy. Simply put, he is determined to pull out of Gaza despite the best efforts of Arafat and the Palestinian Authority. Or say it like this: he will punish the terrorists by ending the Israeli occupation, leaving Arafat with “such mundane tasks as attracting foreign investment, building new housing and filling pot holes in downtown Ramallah.”
What is Sharon’s strategy? “... not coexistence but only disengagement. His goal is to divorce Israelis from Palestinians.”
The plan is disengagement. It is withdrawal into defensible borders. It is refusing to play the enemy’s game. In short, it is all about setting boundaries – which is why May’s “divorce” metaphor is so apt. Israel and Palestine are like an unhappy couple, living together out of habit, unable to stand each other, making one another’s lives miserable, and yet unable to let go. It is the very study of a dysfunctional and co-dependent relationship.
The literal boundary of the fence is necessary to this disengagement process; and not surprisingly, William Safire stresses the importance of Israel’s security barrier in persuading the Israeli right that disengagement is in Israel’s own best interests. This, in his analysis, is why Sharon will press forward at full speed with the fence.
And will everyone be perfectly satisfied with the placement of the security barrier (let alone its existence)? Categorically, no. I’d venture to say that not one person will be completely happy with the placement of the fence. But that’s the point: it’s a place to begin negotiating. The Head Heeb makes an indespensible observation about justice and peace. Soundly rejecting the cliché of “no peace without justice”, he contends that “In fact, all peace requires some sacrifice of justice . ... A compromise may be workable, and even fair, but it will rarely be seen as just by any of the compromising parties, because each will be required to give up something to which it feels it is entitled.”
Freedom activists understand that the democratic process – which is, ultimately, none other than the process of life itself – is not about perfection, but about growth. By withdrawing into secure boundaries, Israel will be better able to nurture its own needs while Palestine finds its way forward.
|
What is Sharon’s strategy? “... not coexistence but only disengagement. His goal is to divorce Israelis from Palestinians.”
The plan is disengagement. It is withdrawal into defensible borders. It is refusing to play the enemy’s game. In short, it is all about setting boundaries – which is why May’s “divorce” metaphor is so apt. Israel and Palestine are like an unhappy couple, living together out of habit, unable to stand each other, making one another’s lives miserable, and yet unable to let go. It is the very study of a dysfunctional and co-dependent relationship.
The literal boundary of the fence is necessary to this disengagement process; and not surprisingly, William Safire stresses the importance of Israel’s security barrier in persuading the Israeli right that disengagement is in Israel’s own best interests. This, in his analysis, is why Sharon will press forward at full speed with the fence.
And will everyone be perfectly satisfied with the placement of the security barrier (let alone its existence)? Categorically, no. I’d venture to say that not one person will be completely happy with the placement of the fence. But that’s the point: it’s a place to begin negotiating. The Head Heeb makes an indespensible observation about justice and peace. Soundly rejecting the cliché of “no peace without justice”, he contends that “In fact, all peace requires some sacrifice of justice . ... A compromise may be workable, and even fair, but it will rarely be seen as just by any of the compromising parties, because each will be required to give up something to which it feels it is entitled.”
Freedom activists understand that the democratic process – which is, ultimately, none other than the process of life itself – is not about perfection, but about growth. By withdrawing into secure boundaries, Israel will be better able to nurture its own needs while Palestine finds its way forward.
Morning Report: May 6, 2004
· Sudan on UN Human Rights Commission. (Free Arab Forum) With splendid understatement, Jonathan notes that “It is very interesting to find Sudan on the UN Human Rights Commission.” The regime that actively participates in rape, ethnic cleansing, and genocide against indigenous Africans has been elected to a three-year tem on that august organization.
· Sharon weighs his options. (Safire) William Safire, channeling Ariel Sharon, foresees the Israeli Prime Minister pursuing a “modified disengagement plan”. By re-negotiating the disengagement plan with his cabinet and taking it to the Knesset later, proceeding “more slowly than [Sharon] had hoped”, Arik can allow his opponents to save face and avoid the stigma of acting unilaterally. Safire expresses his hope that Sharon will indeed choose this course.
· Sharon and the messy divorce. (Clifford D. May) Also on the subject of the Gaza disengagement plan, Cliff May argues that Arafat and other Arab leaders oppose the plan because “it would mean that after all these years, terrorism has failed – and they have failed as well.” The aging Sharon is growing impatient and understands that he must seek “not peace but only security”. This is not “rewarding terrorism”, May maintains, but defeating it.
|
· Sharon weighs his options. (Safire) William Safire, channeling Ariel Sharon, foresees the Israeli Prime Minister pursuing a “modified disengagement plan”. By re-negotiating the disengagement plan with his cabinet and taking it to the Knesset later, proceeding “more slowly than [Sharon] had hoped”, Arik can allow his opponents to save face and avoid the stigma of acting unilaterally. Safire expresses his hope that Sharon will indeed choose this course.
· Sharon and the messy divorce. (Clifford D. May) Also on the subject of the Gaza disengagement plan, Cliff May argues that Arafat and other Arab leaders oppose the plan because “it would mean that after all these years, terrorism has failed – and they have failed as well.” The aging Sharon is growing impatient and understands that he must seek “not peace but only security”. This is not “rewarding terrorism”, May maintains, but defeating it.
Wednesday, May 05, 2004
British Influence in Iran
This article details the history of the UK connection with the mullahs' regime in Tehran. Please take a few moments to look it over. I'll be posting excerpts soon, and we'll talk about what it means.
And don't forget to visit the Free Iran board - click the link on my sidebar.
UPDATE:
Sorry, had the wrong link before. This one should get you there.
|
And don't forget to visit the Free Iran board - click the link on my sidebar.
UPDATE:
Sorry, had the wrong link before. This one should get you there.
Every day is an adventure
with America Online.
If you have AOL, you know what I'm talking about.
If you don't ... well, you just don't know what you're missing.
|
If you have AOL, you know what I'm talking about.
If you don't ... well, you just don't know what you're missing.
Best of Blogdad: Iraqis Address the Peace Movement (Part 1)
The worldwide antiwar demonstrations in 2003 attracted a lot of publicity. And the peace activists had quite a lot to say to the rest of us.
Some of the Iraqis they claimed to be defending had a few things to say to them, too, although it is not certain how closely the activists were listening.
The title of Mohammed’s November 17 post, addressed to the peace movement, gets right to the point:
******
YOU OWE US AN APOLOGY
I don’t know really know why Saddam’s regime lasted for over three decades, but I am sure as an Iraqi who survived that period that there’re no legal or moral justifications for it to remain. I was counting days and hours waiting to see an end to that regime, just like all those who suffered the cruelty of that brutal regime. It’s been really a disgrace chasing the world ,the world of the 21st. century, reminding it how incapable it was to aid the oppressed and to sue those who dispised all the values of humanity.
Through out these decades I lost trust in the world governments and international committees. Terms like (human rights, democracy and liberty..etc.)became hallow and meaningless and those who keep repeating these words are liars..liars..liars. I hated the U.N and the security council and Russia and France and Germany and the arab nations and the islamic conference.
I’ve hated George Gallawy and all those marched in the millionic demonstrations against the war .It is I who was oppressed and I don’t want any one to talk on behalf of me, I, who was eager to see rockets falling on Saddam’s nest to set me free, and it is I who desired to die gentlemen, because it’s more merciful than humiliation as it puts an end to my suffer, while humiliation lives with me reminding me every moment that I couldn’t defend myself against those who ill-treated me. [emphasis mine - aa]
******
Take a moment to read this over and think about it. Then read the whole post at the link. And visit the current post by Omar, Mohammed, and Ali Fadhil on their blog “Iraq the Model” – use the link on my sidebar.
Stay tuned for more.
|
Some of the Iraqis they claimed to be defending had a few things to say to them, too, although it is not certain how closely the activists were listening.
The title of Mohammed’s November 17 post, addressed to the peace movement, gets right to the point:
******
YOU OWE US AN APOLOGY
I don’t know really know why Saddam’s regime lasted for over three decades, but I am sure as an Iraqi who survived that period that there’re no legal or moral justifications for it to remain. I was counting days and hours waiting to see an end to that regime, just like all those who suffered the cruelty of that brutal regime. It’s been really a disgrace chasing the world ,the world of the 21st. century, reminding it how incapable it was to aid the oppressed and to sue those who dispised all the values of humanity.
Through out these decades I lost trust in the world governments and international committees. Terms like (human rights, democracy and liberty..etc.)became hallow and meaningless and those who keep repeating these words are liars..liars..liars. I hated the U.N and the security council and Russia and France and Germany and the arab nations and the islamic conference.
I’ve hated George Gallawy and all those marched in the millionic demonstrations against the war .It is I who was oppressed and I don’t want any one to talk on behalf of me, I, who was eager to see rockets falling on Saddam’s nest to set me free, and it is I who desired to die gentlemen, because it’s more merciful than humiliation as it puts an end to my suffer, while humiliation lives with me reminding me every moment that I couldn’t defend myself against those who ill-treated me. [emphasis mine - aa]
******
Take a moment to read this over and think about it. Then read the whole post at the link. And visit the current post by Omar, Mohammed, and Ali Fadhil on their blog “Iraq the Model” – use the link on my sidebar.
Stay tuned for more.
"Marg ba Amerika" ... not!
For those of you who haven't gotten the word yet, the Iranian people don't hate Americans. Forget that stuff about the Great Satan. Read Nicholas Kristof's column in the New York Times. Then check out the discussions on the Free Iran message board - use the link on my sidebar.
|
Sidebar Highlight: Irshad Manji
A Uganda-born Canadian lesbian feminist and practicing Muslim of South Asian heritage, Irshad Manji burst onto the international scene with her book The Trouble with Islam. She advocates a reform of Islam and a return to its tradition of scholarship and tolerance. Go check out her site ... and buy the book.
|
More on the Six Morons
from Stephen at Politburo. Read the assembled comments from various sources. Don't miss the link to Zeyad's blog "Healing Iraq".
I think it's premature to say they've "lost the war" for us. It's simply that they have reminded us of what it is, exactly, that we are fighting; and that "the enemy" exists among our own ranks as well. By "the enemy" I don't simply mean these so-called "soldiers" themselves, but rather the principle of evil represented by their behavior.
But we can win. We have stopped torture at Abu Ghraib before, and we can stop it again - this time for good.
CLARIFICATION:
The Commisar notes that the phrase "six morons who lost the war" is attributed to a Pentagon source and is to be taken as hyperbole.
The part about "losing the war", that is; "morons" is a charitable understatement.
|
I think it's premature to say they've "lost the war" for us. It's simply that they have reminded us of what it is, exactly, that we are fighting; and that "the enemy" exists among our own ranks as well. By "the enemy" I don't simply mean these so-called "soldiers" themselves, but rather the principle of evil represented by their behavior.
But we can win. We have stopped torture at Abu Ghraib before, and we can stop it again - this time for good.
CLARIFICATION:
The Commisar notes that the phrase "six morons who lost the war" is attributed to a Pentagon source and is to be taken as hyperbole.
The part about "losing the war", that is; "morons" is a charitable understatement.
Reading List
courtesy of Emily.
Bold those you have read.
Italicize those you started, but haven't actually finished yet.
Beowulf (a translation)
Achebe, Chinua - Things Fall Apart
Agee, James - A Death in the Family
Austen, Jane - Pride and Prejudice
Baldwin, James - Go Tell It on the Mountain
Beckett, Samuel - Waiting for Godot Plot summary: "They do not move."
Bellow, Saul - The Adventures of Augie March
Bronte, Charlotte - Jane Eyre
Bronte, Emily - Wuthering Heights
Camus, Albert - The Stranger
Cather, Willa - Death Comes for the Archbishop
Chaucer, Geoffrey - The Canterbury Tales
Chekhov, Anton - The Cherry Orchard
Chopin, Kate - The Awakening
Conrad, Joseph - Heart of Darkness
Cooper, James Fenimore - The Last of the Mohicans
Crane, Stephen - The Red Badge of Courage
Dante - Inferno
de Cervantes, Miguel - Don Quixote
Defoe, Daniel - Robinson Crusoe
Dickens, Charles - A Tale of Two Cities
Dostoyevsky, Fyodor - Crime and Punishment
Douglass, Frederick - Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass
Dreiser, Theodore - An American Tragedy
Dumas, Alexandre - The Three Musketeers
Eliot, George - The Mill on the Floss
Ellison, Ralph - Invisible Man ... this one is tremendous.
Emerson, Ralph Waldo - Selected Essays
Faulkner, William - As I Lay Dying
Faulkner, William - The Sound and the Fury
Fielding, Henry - Tom Jones
Fitzgerald, F. Scott - The Great Gatsby
Flaubert, Gustave - Madame Bovary
Ford, Ford Madox - The Good Soldier
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von - Faust
Golding, William - Lord of the Flies
Hardy, Thomas - Tess of the d'Urbervilles
Hawthorne, Nathaniel - The Scarlet Letter
Heller, Joseph - Catch-22
Hemingway, Ernest - A Farewell to Arms
Homer - The Iliad ... not much of a plot there, really
Homer - The Odyssey
Hugo, Victor - The Hunchback of Notre Dame
Hurston, Zora Neale - Their Eyes Were Watching God
Huxley, Aldous - Brave New World
Ibsen, Henrik - A Doll's House
James, Henry - The Portrait of a Lady
James, Henry - The Turn of the Screw
Joyce, James - A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
Kafka, Franz - The Metamorphosis
Kingston, Maxine Hong - The Woman Warrior
Lee, Harper - To Kill a Mockingbird
Lewis, Sinclair - Babbitt ... I did read Arrowsmith.
London, Jack - The Call of the Wild
Mann, Thomas - The Magic Mountain
Marquez, Gabriel Garcia - One Hundred Years of Solitude
Melville, Herman - Bartleby the Scrivener
Melville, Herman - Moby Dick
Miller, Arthur - The Crucible
Morrison, Toni - Beloved Phenomenal. Right up there with "Song of Solomon", the definitive tale of dysfunctional families.
O'Connor, Flannery - A Good Man is Hard to Find They just don't make serial killers like they used to.
O'Neill, Eugene - Long Day's Journey into Night
Orwell, George - Animal Farm
Pasternak, Boris - Doctor Zhivago
Plath, Sylvia - The Bell Jar Read it in high school...hated it. Read it a few years ago...loved it.
Poe, Edgar Allan - Selected Tales
Proust, Marcel - Swann's Way
Pynchon, Thomas - The Crying of Lot 49
Remarque, Erich Maria - All Quiet on the Western Front
Rostand, Edmond - Cyrano de Bergerac
Roth, Henry - Call It Sleep
Salinger, J.D. - The Catcher in the Rye
Shakespeare, William - Hamlet
Shakespeare, William - Macbeth
Shakespeare, William - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Shakespeare, William - Romeo and Juliet
Shaw, George Bernard - Pygmalion
Shelley, Mary - Frankenstein
Silko, Leslie Marmon - Ceremony
Solzhenitsyn, Alexander - One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich
Sophocles - Antigone
Sophocles - Oedipus Rex
Steinbeck, John - The Grapes of Wrath
Stevenson, Robert Louis - Treasure Island
Stowe, Harriet Beecher - Uncle Tom's Cabin
Swift, Jonathan - Gulliver's Travels
Thackeray, William - Vanity Fair
Thoreau, Henry David - Walden
Tolstoy, Leo - War and Peace
Turgenev, Ivan - Fathers and Sons
Twain, Mark - The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
Voltaire - Candide
Vonnegut, Kurt Jr. - Harrison Bergeron
Walker, Alice - The Color Purple "...is God's way of making you sit up and take notice." I loved her early short story collections too.
Wharton, Edith - The House of Mirth
Welty, Eudora - Collected Stories
Whitman, Walt - Leaves of Grass
Wilde, Oscar - The Picture of Dorian Gray
Williams, Tennessee - The Glass Menagerie
Woolf, Virginia - To the Lighthouse
Wright, Richard - Native Son Stunning...the rat at the beginning, along with the tension of the family living at close quarters, sets the tone for the book. The Marxist digression at the end isn't as out of place as some think, IMHO. I think he hated the girl because he felt he had nothing to give her.
Happy reading!
PS - Don't forget to scroll down to read Emily's thoughts on OBOS.
|
Bold those you have read.
Italicize those you started, but haven't actually finished yet.
Beowulf (a translation)
Achebe, Chinua - Things Fall Apart
Agee, James - A Death in the Family
Austen, Jane - Pride and Prejudice
Baldwin, James - Go Tell It on the Mountain
Beckett, Samuel - Waiting for Godot Plot summary: "They do not move."
Bellow, Saul - The Adventures of Augie March
Bronte, Charlotte - Jane Eyre
Bronte, Emily - Wuthering Heights
Camus, Albert - The Stranger
Cather, Willa - Death Comes for the Archbishop
Chaucer, Geoffrey - The Canterbury Tales
Chekhov, Anton - The Cherry Orchard
Chopin, Kate - The Awakening
Conrad, Joseph - Heart of Darkness
Cooper, James Fenimore - The Last of the Mohicans
Crane, Stephen - The Red Badge of Courage
Dante - Inferno
de Cervantes, Miguel - Don Quixote
Defoe, Daniel - Robinson Crusoe
Dickens, Charles - A Tale of Two Cities
Dostoyevsky, Fyodor - Crime and Punishment
Douglass, Frederick - Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass
Dreiser, Theodore - An American Tragedy
Dumas, Alexandre - The Three Musketeers
Eliot, George - The Mill on the Floss
Ellison, Ralph - Invisible Man ... this one is tremendous.
Emerson, Ralph Waldo - Selected Essays
Faulkner, William - As I Lay Dying
Faulkner, William - The Sound and the Fury
Fielding, Henry - Tom Jones
Fitzgerald, F. Scott - The Great Gatsby
Flaubert, Gustave - Madame Bovary
Ford, Ford Madox - The Good Soldier
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von - Faust
Golding, William - Lord of the Flies
Hardy, Thomas - Tess of the d'Urbervilles
Hawthorne, Nathaniel - The Scarlet Letter
Heller, Joseph - Catch-22
Hemingway, Ernest - A Farewell to Arms
Homer - The Iliad ... not much of a plot there, really
Homer - The Odyssey
Hugo, Victor - The Hunchback of Notre Dame
Hurston, Zora Neale - Their Eyes Were Watching God
Huxley, Aldous - Brave New World
Ibsen, Henrik - A Doll's House
James, Henry - The Portrait of a Lady
James, Henry - The Turn of the Screw
Joyce, James - A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
Kafka, Franz - The Metamorphosis
Kingston, Maxine Hong - The Woman Warrior
Lee, Harper - To Kill a Mockingbird
Lewis, Sinclair - Babbitt ... I did read Arrowsmith.
London, Jack - The Call of the Wild
Mann, Thomas - The Magic Mountain
Marquez, Gabriel Garcia - One Hundred Years of Solitude
Melville, Herman - Bartleby the Scrivener
Melville, Herman - Moby Dick
Miller, Arthur - The Crucible
Morrison, Toni - Beloved Phenomenal. Right up there with "Song of Solomon", the definitive tale of dysfunctional families.
O'Connor, Flannery - A Good Man is Hard to Find They just don't make serial killers like they used to.
O'Neill, Eugene - Long Day's Journey into Night
Orwell, George - Animal Farm
Pasternak, Boris - Doctor Zhivago
Plath, Sylvia - The Bell Jar Read it in high school...hated it. Read it a few years ago...loved it.
Poe, Edgar Allan - Selected Tales
Proust, Marcel - Swann's Way
Pynchon, Thomas - The Crying of Lot 49
Remarque, Erich Maria - All Quiet on the Western Front
Rostand, Edmond - Cyrano de Bergerac
Roth, Henry - Call It Sleep
Salinger, J.D. - The Catcher in the Rye
Shakespeare, William - Hamlet
Shakespeare, William - Macbeth
Shakespeare, William - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Shakespeare, William - Romeo and Juliet
Shaw, George Bernard - Pygmalion
Shelley, Mary - Frankenstein
Silko, Leslie Marmon - Ceremony
Solzhenitsyn, Alexander - One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich
Sophocles - Antigone
Sophocles - Oedipus Rex
Steinbeck, John - The Grapes of Wrath
Stevenson, Robert Louis - Treasure Island
Stowe, Harriet Beecher - Uncle Tom's Cabin
Swift, Jonathan - Gulliver's Travels
Thackeray, William - Vanity Fair
Thoreau, Henry David - Walden
Tolstoy, Leo - War and Peace
Turgenev, Ivan - Fathers and Sons
Twain, Mark - The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
Voltaire - Candide
Vonnegut, Kurt Jr. - Harrison Bergeron
Walker, Alice - The Color Purple "...is God's way of making you sit up and take notice." I loved her early short story collections too.
Wharton, Edith - The House of Mirth
Welty, Eudora - Collected Stories
Whitman, Walt - Leaves of Grass
Wilde, Oscar - The Picture of Dorian Gray
Williams, Tennessee - The Glass Menagerie
Woolf, Virginia - To the Lighthouse
Wright, Richard - Native Son Stunning...the rat at the beginning, along with the tension of the family living at close quarters, sets the tone for the book. The Marxist digression at the end isn't as out of place as some think, IMHO. I think he hated the girl because he felt he had nothing to give her.
Happy reading!
PS - Don't forget to scroll down to read Emily's thoughts on OBOS.
Ays
is in Basra and he's not a happy camper. Running short of patience and beer. He has some extremely valuable observations about the new UAE-based Arab channel, "al-Sharqiya". Don't miss the Comments section, where Paul Edwards in Australia has some very insightful comments on the transition from authoritarianism to autonomy. And scroll down to read Ays' comments on Abu Ghraib.
|
Feyrouz
has a post asking “What if the Iraqis liberated themselves?” (Hint: Saddam would probably not be chatting with Red Cross representatives about the fine points of the Genevea Convention.) Read the post here. Stay tuned to her blog "Live from Dallas" for upcoming thoughts on Middle Eastern culture.
|
Morning Report: May 5, 2004
· Debka on US policy. An analysis by Debka reflects on Bush’s attempts to distance himself from the Likud rejection of Sharon’s Gaza pullout plan. The article also speculates on future moves by the State Department towards implementation of the Road Map.
· Sudden zeal: State, CIA, and Chalabi. (David Frum) Frum’s piece, referenced here earlier, strongly rejects the claim that Chalabi has aided the Iranian regime, and raises pointed questions about the State Department’s motives in making such an allegation, particularly in light of its usual “see-no-evil” approach to Tehran. Watch for more posts on State/Defense relations.
· Omar: Iraqis react to Abu Ghraib; reflections on the media in Iraq; Pachachi wins straw poll. (Iraq the Model) Latest developments in post titled “Old Friends, and a Conversation to Share”.
· Bush must acknowledge challenges. (Belmont Club) A flawed policy is better than a stupid one, says Wretchard; to gain a decisive lead over Kerry, the President must recognize that “the war in Iraq ... has yet to be won”. He must acknowledge “deeply hostile factions in Iraq” and the reality of Iranian and Syrian insurgency, in order to win back his credibility and the public’s trust and support.
· Schools closed in Zimbabwe. (Head Heeb) Jonathan discusses the economics – and politics - of education in Zimbabwe.
· Ginmar’s post on violence and sexism draws responses. (View from a Broad) An American woman soldier discusses rape and domestic violence, prompting a number of other women to share their experiences. Not to be missed.
|
· Sudden zeal: State, CIA, and Chalabi. (David Frum) Frum’s piece, referenced here earlier, strongly rejects the claim that Chalabi has aided the Iranian regime, and raises pointed questions about the State Department’s motives in making such an allegation, particularly in light of its usual “see-no-evil” approach to Tehran. Watch for more posts on State/Defense relations.
· Omar: Iraqis react to Abu Ghraib; reflections on the media in Iraq; Pachachi wins straw poll. (Iraq the Model) Latest developments in post titled “Old Friends, and a Conversation to Share”.
· Bush must acknowledge challenges. (Belmont Club) A flawed policy is better than a stupid one, says Wretchard; to gain a decisive lead over Kerry, the President must recognize that “the war in Iraq ... has yet to be won”. He must acknowledge “deeply hostile factions in Iraq” and the reality of Iranian and Syrian insurgency, in order to win back his credibility and the public’s trust and support.
· Schools closed in Zimbabwe. (Head Heeb) Jonathan discusses the economics – and politics - of education in Zimbabwe.
· Ginmar’s post on violence and sexism draws responses. (View from a Broad) An American woman soldier discusses rape and domestic violence, prompting a number of other women to share their experiences. Not to be missed.
"I Am A Rapest"
Andrew Sullivan quotes from the Abu Ghraib charge sheet at sickening length; including:
i. (S) Writing “I am a Rapest” (sic) on the leg of a detainee alleged to have forcibly raped a 15-year old fellow detainee, and then photographing him naked;
...
k. (S) A male MP guard having sex with a female detainee;
...
Here’s a lesson in how corrupt power works: the prisoner alleged to have raped another prisoner is punished and humiliated; but the guard is free to have sex with the prisoners at his whim. (The charge sheet does not say that the male guard “raped” the female detainee; but the act was certainly rape in every meaningful sense, simply by virtue of the fact that he held all the power and she held none.)
None of the guards had themselves photographed with misspelled confessions written on their bodies. Their guns and uniforms stated clearly enough who they were: they were the ones holding power. And how did they use that power? We’re just beginning to find out.
Think what this means. These degenerates have written their own meaning into the uniform that thousands of honorable men and women wear proudly every day. They have re-defined the American military uniform to mean, “I am a rapist”.
No American veteran can forgive this. The United States must practice “leadership by example” and make an example of these vermin. And we must extirpate the cancer of power abuse, not only in the military but in society at large.
We can do it. We must do it.
i. (S) Writing “I am a Rapest” (sic) on the leg of a detainee alleged to have forcibly raped a 15-year old fellow detainee, and then photographing him naked;
...
k. (S) A male MP guard having sex with a female detainee;
...
Here’s a lesson in how corrupt power works: the prisoner alleged to have raped another prisoner is punished and humiliated; but the guard is free to have sex with the prisoners at his whim. (The charge sheet does not say that the male guard “raped” the female detainee; but the act was certainly rape in every meaningful sense, simply by virtue of the fact that he held all the power and she held none.)
None of the guards had themselves photographed with misspelled confessions written on their bodies. Their guns and uniforms stated clearly enough who they were: they were the ones holding power. And how did they use that power? We’re just beginning to find out.
Think what this means. These degenerates have written their own meaning into the uniform that thousands of honorable men and women wear proudly every day. They have re-defined the American military uniform to mean, “I am a rapist”.
No American veteran can forgive this. The United States must practice “leadership by example” and make an example of these vermin. And we must extirpate the cancer of power abuse, not only in the military but in society at large.
We can do it. We must do it.